Blast

[Beck]

Get a subscription. In the NYT, it most definitely is political. Journalistic ethics to their editors is an oxymoron. Check their bias ratings. They'll take some insignificant piece of information and twist it to the left. Read the article, it may sound scientific but the agenda is more government regulation. My two cents, if you want to hammer your brain in an indoor range, go ahead. I don't need some NYT do gooders to tell me something already known and what, when and where to shoot. We have too much of that now.

https://www.allsides.com/media-bias/media-bias-chart

I don't think anyone would claim that the NYT isn't left leaning, but your take on situation doesn't need to be political

 

[Beck]

More fodder: When it comes to guns, the NYT doesn't even shed the sheep's clothing. Never take anything they print on guns as good. Their proven agenda more regulation.


number of anti-gun articles in the New York Times


re: Perplexity.

The exact number of anti-gun articles in the New York Times over the last year is not directly stated in available sources. However, it is well-documented that the New York Times has consistently supported strict gun control in its coverage and editorial stance, publishing numerous articles highlighting gun violence, critiques of gun rights, and calls for stronger regulations. The Times published detailed analyses and mapping of gun homicides, coverage of legislative efforts on gun safety laws, and opinion pieces largely favoring gun control measures.

While the total count is unavailable, the volume of reporting and editorial content reflects a strong focus on gun control advocacy rather than a balanced or pro-gun rights perspective. Coverage includes critical views on gun ownership's costs and the societal impact of guns, consistent with an anti-gun control editorial line. This context indicates a substantial number of articles leaning anti-gun in various sections, especially in news reports on gun violence and in opinion/editorial pieces.

you're just talking to yourself now