I've built a few 45 ACPs over the years and I do love the 1911's design. Aren't you guys concerned in a back-country situation that the complexity and quantity of non-stainless parts is likely to fail?
I would think the very first consideration for back country would be something 100% rust resistant down to the last component?
@RSL - I have a Neighbor that also carries (9mm) and his 1st two rounds are also “snake shot” — I just don’t get the logic? Any snake you see in time to Draw handgun & shoot you can also just take a step backwards —-or if you feel compelled to kill it, just use a stick/rock or anything else. On the other hand, if you are ever attacked by a Bear, Cougar, Person —-that’s gonna happen FAST and do you really want your first few shots to be “snake shot”? (Before you cycle thru to the real bullets)… I doubt that #12 fine shot will ever stop more then a HummingbirdI carry a 4 5/8 Ruger Blackhawk in 41 mag here in AZ. 1st 3 are homemade snake shot next 3 are 220 or 225 Keith style swc. I usually just walk around the rattlers but have been in a situation where that was not possible. This homemade stuff works very well. I've never had to think about using the Keith's.......yet. Almost everyone in the AZ back country is packing so that keeps everyone at least semi-friendly. But it seems the mountain lion population is growing.
So there's that concern.
Well said .... Pistol Calibers are also all slow, meaning there's limited to no hydrostatic shock created in the wound channel, and you must rely on exsanguination or muscle skeletal incapacitation to effectively disable or incapacitate an opponent. That said I'd still like to avoid adding any additional holes to my body.1: ALL pistol calibers suck. ALL OF THEM. Humans are relatively fragile and most people shot with a handgun will survive. But, handguns are a lot more convenient than always having a rifle. That said, if I am going to have a rifle in my hands, that’s definitely the primary option.
2: Semi-autos can be pushed out of battery, but this can be prevented for 1 round if you use your thumb to keep the slide pushed forward in battery. Rack the slide to eject the empty and load a new cartridge.
3: Revolvers DO MALFUNCTION. When they do, it’s not usually something you can’t fix right away. They also run out of bullets fast. They are my absolute last option. However, they do have their niche. In my line of work, almost every incident will end up on the ground. I set up my gear so I have one lethal, and one less-lethal option for each hand. My primary handgun on my strong side, and a S&W 642 on my weak side, hidden. If the person I’m dealing with is fixated on the gun in my holster, I will find an opportunity to surprise him with the other one.
Yup, this is my choice too. Nothing against Buffalo Bore, but I have this stuff in .357, .40 and 10mm. I usually carry a S&W M&P 360 here in CO, were we only have to deal with Black bears. Its small and very light, I usually forget I'm wearing it. It only carries 5 rounds, but if I need more than that for black bear, I messed up. My Glock 20 or 29 are great in camp, but the longer barrel, extra weight and size dont give me much advantage over the much smaller revolver. If I was in Alaska, or anywhere grizzlies roam, would step up to the G20.Underwood 10mm 220grn coated hardcast @ 1200fps/704fpe. Plus, for the complete win, the 10mm's sectional density advantage for max penetration over the .45-class slugs.
View attachment 776229
Holy Wall of Text, Batman! LOL!I generally prefer revolvers in the backcountry as they are generally more reliable in inclement conditions, dirt, brush, dust, wet. I live 60 miles from the Mexican border, and predators I encounter are much more likely to be 2 legged than 4 legged, but USUALLY unarmed, but not always. My 4" Dan Wesson 357 is generally reliable and does good service against predators up to and including mt. lions, which are also quite common here, although rarely actually encountered as a threat. They usually keep their distance, from people my size especially. I have only had one face off with a mt. lion at spitting distance, but I had a 30-06 in my hands. If encouter with black bear is possible, as is not infrequent in higher elevations within 20 miles from my home (up to 10,000ft elevation), then my 6" Dan Wesson 44mag is a much better choice, but significantly heavier to pack around in a lot of vertical terrain. It is also accurate enough that I have head shot rabbits for the camp pot at 30 yards with it. However, encounters with large predators being relatively rare and usually fairly easy to avoid here, my favorite back country carry gun for weight, speed, power, reliability, and versatility is my 2.75" barrel Webley Mk VI shooting 45acp in full-moon clips. I can reload it as quikly as a semi-auto, and it will do good service on predators and varmints up to and including mt. lion, and I can slip a 410 shotshell into it for shooting small game birds or small game animals for survival/camp pot, or shooting the occasional rattlesnake blocking the trail or invading the camp at night, with a lot less ricochet risk, since they don't call them the Rocky Mountains for nothing. I can also use a rifled 410 to 22lr adapter in single shot fashion for survival as well. This alone would allow me to carry 50 rounds in a shirt pocket and to feed myself for quite some time if need be.
John Wick even carries one, except in Russian Orthodox churches. How could you go wrong?
View attachment 776248
View attachment 776250
It is a pretty handy and versatile piece for either self-defense and/or survival, and lightweight enough you will forget it is there until you need it. It is one of my favorites, if not most favorite for backcountry carry.
Webley handguns have been getting the job done in some of the worst environments all over the globe for over 100 years, This one is over 100 years old and still runs like a clock. Believe me, you don't want to run into the wrong end of it.
For everyday carry it is almost invariably a semi-auto of some variety for me. For back country carry, I prefer the revolver. In all scenarios there is probably also a mousegun in an out of the way place, just in case a 2 legged predator gets the drop on me.
As far as protection against really big bears, handgun "protection" is only illusory, regardless of caliber. 9 times out of 10, or 999 times out of 1000, a big bear is going to kill you if you only have a handgun when it attacks. Don't get me wrong, I would still carry a S&W 500 as a backup hope for the best if I had to use it, but primary protection would always be a long gun in a caliber starting in the 400's or bigger. Even this won't guarantee survival against the big bears, but your odds do go way up if you have time to react and know how to use it..
Situational awareness is always paramount to survival. If in bear country, always examine scat you find. Black bear scat has rodent fur in it and smells like berries. Grizzly scat has bear bells, 45acp cases in full moon clips, and 10mm fired cases in it, and smells like bear spray.
I generally prefer revolvers in the backcountry as they are generally more reliable in inclement conditions, dirt, brush, dust, wet. I live 60 miles from the Mexican border, and predators I encounter are much more likely to be 2 legged than 4 legged, but USUALLY unarmed, but not always. My 4" Dan Wesson 357 is generally reliable and does good service against predators up to and including mt. lions, which are also quite common here, although rarely actually encountered as a threat. They usually keep their distance, from people my size especially. I have only had one face off with a mt. lion at spitting distance, but I had a 30-06 in my hands. If encouter with black bear is possible, as is not infrequent in higher elevations within 20 miles from my home (up to 10,000ft elevation), then my 6" Dan Wesson 44mag is a much better choice, but significantly heavier to pack around in a lot of vertical terrain. It is also accurate enough that I have head shot rabbits for the camp pot at 30 yards with it. However, encounters with large predators being relatively rare and usually fairly easy to avoid here, my favorite back country carry gun for weight, speed, power, reliability, and versatility is my 2.75" barrel Webley Mk VI shooting 45acp in full-moon clips. I can reload it as quikly as a semi-auto, and it will do good service on predators and varmints up to and including mt. lion, and I can slip a 410 shotshell into it for shooting small game birds or small game animals for survival/camp pot, or shooting the occasional rattlesnake blocking the trail or invading the camp at night, with a lot less ricochet risk, since they don't call them the Rocky Mountains for nothing. I can also use a rifled 410 to 22lr adapter in single shot fashion for survival as well. This alone would allow me to carry 50 rounds in a shirt pocket and to feed myself for quite some time if need be.
John Wick even carries one, except in Russian Orthodox churches. How could you go wrong?
View attachment 776248
View attachment 776250
It is a pretty handy and versatile piece for either self-defense and/or survival, and lightweight enough you will forget it is there until you need it. It is one of my favorites, if not most favorite for backcountry carry.
Webley handguns have been getting the job done in some of the worst environments all over the globe for over 100 years, This one is over 100 years old and still runs like a clock. Believe me, you don't want to run into the wrong end of it.
For everyday carry it is almost invariably a semi-auto of some variety for me. For back country carry, I prefer the revolver. In all scenarios there is probably also a mousegun in an out of the way place, just in case a 2 legged predator gets the drop on me.
As far as protection against really big bears, handgun "protection" is only illusory, regardless of caliber. 9 times out of 10, or 999 times out of 1000, a big bear is going to kill you if you only have a handgun when it attacks. Don't get me wrong, I would still carry a S&W 500 as a backup hope for the best if I had to use it, but primary protection would always be a long gun in a caliber starting in the 400's or bigger. Even this won't guarantee survival against the big bears, but your odds do go way up if you have time to react and know how to use it..
Situational awareness is always paramount to survival. If in bear country, always examine scat you find. Black bear scat has rodent fur in it and smells like berries. Grizzly scat has bear bells, 45acp cases in full moon clips, and 10mm fired cases in it, and smells like bear spray.
There’s a professional hunter here who was grappling with a 150-kg boar that was lying on top of him.You bring up a good point. Like a fight with a human, most bear attacks end up being taken to the ground in a brawl or wrestling match. It more often happens before you can you can Quick Draw McGraw your way out of it.
So since you are now rolling around on the ground with your human or bear attacker. There is a group of trainers that believes in a revolver for those situations. Calling them an ENT weapon.
Cramming the muzzle of your revolver into the ear, nose or throat as you pull the trigger.
You may want to rethink the semi auto for that reason. If you carry with one in the chamber that will be your 1st and only shot. It won’t chamber the second round with the muzzle making contact of any kind.
So there is a whole camp out there reconsidering small 5 shot revolvers for humans and bears.
I’m too ingrained in the semi to change now. But food for thought if you already carry a revolver
It didn't take 10 lifetimes for THAT professional hunter.But those are the kinds of situations that happen once in 10 lifetimes.
you're right, tooIt didn't take 10 lifetimes for THAT professional hunter.
I have #6s in the "snake" loads. But you do you and i will do what works for me in my area.@RSL - I have a Neighbor that also carries (9mm) and his 1st two rounds are also “snake shot” — I just don’t get the logic? Any snake you see in time to Draw handgun & shoot you can also just take a step backwards —-or if you feel compelled to kill it, just use a stick/rock or anything else. On the other hand, if you are ever attacked by a Bear, Cougar, Person —-that’s gonna happen FAST and do you really want your first few shots to be “snake shot”? (Before you cycle thru to the real bullets)… I doubt that #12 fine shot will ever stop more then a Hummingbird
@RSL - agree everyone does what works for them - just wanted to know why some people use a handgun on a Snake? Or maybe more curious is why some carry a handgun “Just” for snakes - even when other dangerous animals are Not in the area? Having ‘snake shot’ loaded for the first 2-3 rounds out of a gun (the way my Neighbor does) makes that gun Less effective against a larger threat. While it is a good excuse to shoot a handgun and it certainly works - especially with a special load like snake shot….and if someone likes shooting snakes or is very afraid of snakes and a handgun provides comfort —- that may be a good enough reason. A handgun is certainly Not necessary for snake protection but it is effective, so is a Stick or brick-size-rock (but where is a “stick or rock” when you need one??). My Neighbor is a good guy, I’ve asked him the same question and he just laughs saying “I hate snakes”.I have #6s in the "snake" loads. But you do you and i will do what works for me in my area.
I didn’t see Mr Hack’s opinion regarding a 12 ga with say Brenneke Black Magic Magnum Slugs. Any idea what JJ thinks about that combination against bear?There is a man with more handgun bear killing experience than anyone I have ever heard of. Across his career, he was a game manager on over 300,000 acre timber conern which bordered an even bigger wilderness area with an almost unlimited number of bears. He was federally licensed to remove (trap and kill) problem bears, which he did day in and day out for years. He was a black bear hunting guide in Idaho and Washinton in season. He was a grizzly bear guide in Alaska. He was the Western Editor for Bear Hunting Magazine, and he is currently a Professional Hunter in South Africa. He has personally killed dozens, if not over 100 black bears with a handgun, He has been guide for hundreds of other bear killed, counting both grizzlies in AK, and black bears in the lower 48. After seeing bears shot with handguns, from 45acp, to 357 mag, to 10mm, to 41 mag, to 44mag, to 454 to Contender single shot hand cannons. he has formed some definite, probably indisputeable, opinions about the effectiveness of different handgun calibers and loads for hunting and defense against bears. Anyone else who has personally shot over 100 bears with a handgun, the majority of which were enraged and fighting for their lives and trying to tear his head off, because they had one foot in a foot snare at the time, feel free to disagree. He has been kind enough and patient enough to answer some of my ignorant, novice questions over the years.
Here are some of JJ Hack's hard earned opinions:
1. Handguns can be sufficient for Black Bear hunting and defense, under the following specific conditions:
A. sufficient caliber (41mag/10mm caliber and up for hunting under 75yds, 44mag caliber and
up for defense under 50yds)
B. sufficient IMPACT velocity over 1000fps (not just muzzle velocity)
C. sufficient bullet weight over 200gr.
2. No handguns and few long guns are sufficient for stopping Brown Bear/ Grizzly charges. For big bear defense you should use long guns starting at a minimum caliber of 375, with 270gn bullets at 2700fps or 300gr bullets at 2500fps.
3. His personal carry arm for black bear defense was a Ruger Redhawk 7.5" barrel, with 240gr Jacketed Hollow Points. At first he carried Randy Garret 300gr hardcasts, but they proved to have insufficient stopping effect. Hardcast would kill with a heart/lung shot, but the bear may run over 100yds before they die. They may run away from you or at you. Hack shot dozens of black bears with the 240gr JHP's, and "NOT ONE RAN OFF AFTER BEING HIT. "
In JJ Hack's own words about shooting Black Bears with a 44 Mag for DEFENSE:
"The heavy hard cast bullets don't disrupt enough tissue to crumple or stall a bear unless a perfect CNS hit is made, Feel lucky? The better choice and I say this after trying so many loads and killing so many bears I feel the research is nearly indisputable, is the common 240 grain hollowpoint. I have used many types but having done research with Hornady to develope the XTP bullet in the 80's I feel the XTP is as good as any bullet or even better. I have seen nearly every bear hit with a Garrett bullet run a long way unless CNS hits were made. However with a 240 hollowpoint the bears will spin like a top and bite at the wound trying to get the burning "bee" out of there hide. This allows many more shots. I have also seen them fall at impact and roll aound on the ground while bawling their heads off allowing more shots. These bullets rarely exit and tear up so much tissue that the bears really show amazing impact effect when compared to the 300 grain hardcast bullets most folks want for hunting. I would not use a 300 grain hard cast bullet for bears as a first choice."
Here is an exerpt from an email exchange I had with JJ Hack more than 15 years ago. My question in the underlined part. His answer follows:
I realize a handgun is not ideal for the purpose, but for very large dangerous game like lion, cape buffalo, brown bear or moose, what handgun and load would you recommend for last ditch protection (i.e stopping a charge and/or shooting an animal that is on you)?
Stopping a charge is not gonna happen on the animals listed using a handgun so eliminate that from your inventory of choices! As I said above it may happen once or twice with a lucky CNS hit but it's an absolutely non functional weapon to depend upon. It will give you a false sense of security and put you into situations you would not otherwise have gone into unarmed. With a handgun you are effectively "unarmed" against those animals.
I have had a bear on me and been chewed at the same time I had a 44 mag ruger redhawk with 300 grain garrett hardcast bullets. I never was able to get the gun out of the holster to use it. Every Time I moved the bear bit me again and again. A brown bear lion or Cape buffalo will crunch you to bits long before you could use it by your statement of "shooting something that's on you". It may work to deter the animal but your really pulling the auxillary rip cord at that point. I think anything starting with a .44 mag would be better then nothing or a sharp stick but it's likely too late by the time you pull the trigger.
The Chinese philosopher Lao Tzu said:
A smart man learns from his own experience. A wise man learns from the experience of others. (emphasis mine of course)
I have never shot a bear with a handgun, but I have taken time to find people who have, A LOT, and learn from their EXPERIENCE. Ain't the interweb grand.
Holy Wall of Words - He's done it again Batman.
PAYS YOUR MONEY AND TAKES YOUR CHANCES as they say. YMMV