Politics

It's a gift, from Colt imo.
 
Lenya had another pair, with ivory grips, I dunno which pair is Connors'
 
As far as I remember, the current Constitution of Yugoslavia did not clearly and unambiguously provide for the free exit of the republics from the federation.
 
Australian tyranny?

I find this story pretty hard to swallow. I too would have to hear from someone we know to believe this. Not saying it couldnt or wont happen at some point somewhere,, but I dont think we are there yet and I hope we never are.
 
I'd love it f HR McMaster ran for POTUS in 2024. A real leader, smart and tough when he needs to be.

I think we can do much better than this guy. He is just another ex mil, mealy mouth wannabe. No thanks.
However he would be better than many out there and he is certainly a lot better than those two assclowns that did the AssStan presser today, Milly and Austin.
Talk about a couple of fat weasels! Total disgrace along with everyone else involved in this administration, just sickening!
 
FB_IMG_1629330515907.jpg
 
@WAB
These guys were saving airmen as well, and they were doing it in the line of duty:
They are worth mentioning as well.

It is inherently dangerous when two recognized governments (USA and YU, then) declare same person a war hero, or a another one convicts him as a war criminal, as we have the case of Mihailovic in ww2.

It sends a wrong moral message, it blurs the line between right or wrong and makes grounds for next conflict.

Mihailovic is now history, but the similar thing happens today.

Hero to some (bosnian serbs), a war criminal to the world.
Gen. Mladic, convicted war criminal in Hague (for Srebrenica Massacre - 7000 civilians killed, under his responsibilty)

In the same time - a war hero for bosnian serbs, getting monuments build.


In the same time, they also returned downed airmen in balcan wars ("as an act of courtesy"):

How would you rate above?

I am now back on Mihailovic:
So, basically this is a deep moral question, and how to deal with it.
What does weight more, a good deed (saving air crews), or criminal act (killing civilians of other nationalities)?
How then to judge the man?

If I compare this within some healthy legal, moral and functioning system, in healthy human society it turns out the punishments weights more when proven guilty, regardless of legal system.

When proven guilty, the punishment follows, and social benefits are generally revoked. (as well as military decorations)

Simply put, a convicted war murderer can not be a recognized war hero in the same time.

When we cannot bring back the dead, then that is our attempt to make justice and keep our respect to the victims.

In this moral dilemma - brits distanced themselves from Mihailovic before the end of war. It was not faulty intelligence. (Besides the practical part and actual awareness who actually fought the war against nazis in the balcans)
 
Last edited:
Tito was a communist, Mihailovic a Royalist. Both committed atrocities in support of their beliefs. The Brits were so focused on defeating Facism that they were willing to stomach communism, a decision that later haunted them.

It seems that the victor writes history and defines the moral high ground. Only God knows what dwells in men’s hearts and ultimately they both had to answer to him.
 
It seems that the victor writes history and defines the moral high ground. Only God knows what dwells in men’s hearts and ultimately they both had to answer to him.

@WAB
Absolutely correct!(y)
 
  • Like
Reactions: WAB
@Vashper

Just now I have caught your comment.
As far as I remember, the current Constitution of Yugoslavia did not clearly and unambiguously provide for the free exit of the republics from the federation.

(
I make copy-paste because my quote function doesnt work on my computer)

This refers to yugo constitution as of 1974.
Lets go now to historical development of this article, since end of ww2.

Constitution in 1946:
FNRJ je savezna narodna država republika, zajednica ravnopravnih naroda koji su na osnovi prava na samoopredjeljenje uključujući pravo na otcjepljenje na temelju zajedničke borbe i slobodno izražene volje

Translation:
The FNRJ (fFderal peoples republic of Yugoslavia) is a federal people's state republic, a community of equal peoples based on the right to self-determination, including the right to secede on the basis of common struggle and free will.

Constitution 1963, from its basic principles:
Narodi Jugoslavije polazeći od prava svakog naroda na samoopredjeljenje uključujući pravo na otcjepljenje na temelju zajedničke borbe i slobodno izražene volje

Translation:
The peoples of Yugoslavia starting from the right of every people to self-determination, including the right to secede on the basis of common struggle and free will


Constituiton 1974, basic principles in full:
Narodi Jugoslavije, polazeći od prava svakog naroda na samoopredeljenje, uključujući i pravo na otcepljenje, na osnovu svoje slobodno izražene volje u zajedničkoj borbi svih naroda i narodnosti u narodnooslobodilačkom ratu i socijalističkoj revoluciji, a u skladu sa svojim istorijskim težnjama, svesni da je dalje učvršćivanje njihovog bratstva i jedinstva u zajedničkom interesu, zajedno sa narodnostima sa kojima žive, ujedinili su se u saveznu republiku slobodnih i ravnopravnih naroda i narodnosti i stvorili socijalističku federativnu zajednicu radnih ljudi —

Translation:
The peoples of Yugoslavia, starting from the right of every people to self-determination, including the right to secede, on the basis of their freely expressed will in the common struggle of all peoples and nationalities in the national liberation war and socialist revolution, and aware of their historical aspirations fraternities and unity in the common interest, together with the nationalities with which they live, united in a federal republic of free and equal peoples and nationalities and created a socialist federal community of working people -




------
Now, obviously there is no clear administrative procedure stating: in order to go out of federation, a respective republic will need to fill up form b, complete procedure this and that, apply for official hearing, register and file in that office, for final bill will be XX months deadline for appeal, etc... etc... So in first two countries (slovenia and croatia) it went by system of referendum.

It would be interesting to compare how Czechoslovakia for example separated to Czech republic and Slovakia, and what was the legal and constituional backgounds for this separation.
Unfortuantely in ex Yu the war happened.
 
Last edited:
Brent,

That article is so contrived, using cherry-picked material with misplaced context, drawing such wildly unsupported conclusions that I would expect it to appear in an anti hunting campaign.
I even sent the editor a message demanding proof, or a retraction with apology, for using kids for whatever twisted satire it may be.

So far ....no response.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
62,019
Messages
1,361,144
Members
117,848
Latest member
QSRAnnie37
 

 

 

Latest profile posts

Looking for recommendations for kudu and eland
crossfire3006 wrote on JoninCO's profile.
Had an excellent classifieds transaction with JoninCO. A truly honest and standup member. I wouldn't hesitate at all to deal with him again. Thanks, J!
Francois R wrote on Lance Hopper's profile.
Hi Lance, Hope you well. I collect Mauser rifles and they are very much part of my cultural history in Africa. Would you consider selling the rifle now a year on ? I'd like to place it in my collection of Mauser rifles. Many thx
 
Top