- Joined
- Apr 13, 2013
- Messages
- 9,177
- Reaction score
- 30,921
- Location
- Delaware, USA
- Media
- 97
- Articles
- 5
- Member of
- Atglen Sportsmen's Club, NRA, SCI
- Hunted
- RSA, DE, NJ, PA, KS, TX, ME
I agree, I would give anything to take my dad (like the last hunt report on korrinkoppie) .I completely agree. This thread can serve its purpose without insulting other hunters who are likely beyond proud of the animals they harvested.
In the US to get a tax deduction it must be to a 501c3 and a the deduction is only the amount paid over the items value. No idea about RSA.This thread has been an adventure in it's self. An abundance of topics, scenarios and speculations have been debated with most employing some form of learning experience we all could benefit from, I certainly have.
It is most unfortunate for the OP that the makings of a new experience was hendered from what seems to rooted from lack of communication and bad attitudes. And yes, it's unfortunate for the hunting lodge as their name and reputation have been devastated, was this called for? Sure would help if their side of the story was known, otherwise silents will issue guilt and humiliation.
Similar to the OP, my hunting trip was an auction win, 5 day hunt for 4 hunters in the Limpopo area. Had a wonderful time, shared those experiences in the hunting report section. Would I revisit the lodge we stayed with, absolutely, would gladly book a full price stay. Though the Eastern Cape has a draw on me too.
I do have a thought for folks to ponder on, when bashing the auctioned hunts, or the cheap way out as some have pointed out. Our trip was won at a friend's of the NRA convention, which carries a tax deduction for the doner. It is not upfront income, but helps on the back side and the lodge we stayed at is American owned so they would have benefited from this. Excuse my illiteracy on the auctioned hunts, are these generally part of a charitable event so as to claim the tax breaks. I have no knowledge on SA tax laws, but I would assume the SA owner/operators would have some form of tax breaks for donated/auctioned hunts.
Does not excuse the sour attitudes the OP had to endure, but it's a thought.
While I’m not an accountant or tax lawyer, I was just coming to say the same thing. The only Auction Hunts this is really relevant with are the big North American Auction Tags, bidding $200-600k on a Governors Sheep or Elk tag is a major tax write off BUT you need to have a bough income where that deduction benefits you.In the US to get a tax deduction it must be to a 501c3 and a the deduction is only the amount paid over the items value. No idea about RSA.
Size and sex is not the issue being criticized. That wildebeest had a defective horn. It was a cull. Probably inbred. No one is saying the client is an idiot for shooting the thing. Seems he didn't know any better. If he doesn't know the outfitter had him taking out the garbage and paying for it, then how do we tell him he got screwed without pointing out the animals are garbage? And if he doesn't know he got screwed, he is likely to go back and get screwed again. The sad part is the outfitter obviously recruited this client to come on here and fight his battles for him, knowing full well he had him shooting culls as trophy animals. I hope the client is now wiser. He should not be upset with this forum for exposing his naivity. Being naive is what first safaris are about. It's expected. That's why we are required to have PHs when hunting. He should be upset with the outfitter, not singing his praises.Bashing another member's animals that they are proud of because you think poorly of the outfitter seems pretty gross to me. I get the person was probably asked to come on and write a positive review by the outfitter who should come on here and do his dirty work himself. But, man, what a bad look for the site and what a horrible way to treat new members. Some people tell them to go post their own hunt report, but why would anyone want to write a hunt report with the comments people are making after posting a few photos.
I've also seen a lot of Blue Wildebeest posted to the site that looked just like that one or even smaller and everyone just said "congratulations".
If they are buying the tag, how is it a tax writeoff? The "winner" purchases a product. I don't think that works up here. Shouldn't. If I buy a gun at a DU auction, I can't write off the amount paid as a gift. The donor gets the writeoff, not the buyer.While I’m not an accountant or tax lawyer, I was just coming to say the same thing. The only Auction Hunts this is really relevant with are the big North American Auction Tags, bidding $200-600k on a Governors Sheep or Elk tag is a major tax write off BUT you need to have a bough income where that deduction benefits you.
Well articulated. Thanks.This thread has been an adventure in it's self. An abundance of topics, scenarios and speculations have been debated with most employing some form of learning experience we all could benefit from, I certainly have.
It is most unfortunate for the OP that the makings of a new experience was hendered from what seems to rooted from lack of communication and bad attitudes. And yes, it's unfortunate for the hunting lodge as their name and reputation have been devastated, was this called for? Sure would help if their side of the story was known, otherwise silents will issue guilt and humiliation.
Similar to the OP, my hunting trip was an auction win, 5 day hunt for 4 hunters in the Limpopo area. Had a wonderful time, shared those experiences in the hunting report section. Would I revisit the lodge we stayed with, absolutely, would gladly book a full price stay. Though the Eastern Cape has a draw on me too.
I do have a thought for folks to ponder on, when bashing the auctioned hunts, or the cheap way out as some have pointed out. Our trip was won at a friend's of the NRA convention, which carries a tax deduction for the doner. It is not upfront income, but helps on the back side and the lodge we stayed at is American owned so they would have benefited from this. Excuse my illiteracy on the auctioned hunts, are these generally part of a charitable event so as to claim the tax breaks. I have no knowledge on SA tax laws, but I would assume the SA owner/operators would have some form of tax breaks for donated/auctioned hunts.
Does not excuse the sour attitudes the OP had to endure, but it's a thought.
Ah, I didn't catch that. Good eye.Says the new member sent by the Outfitter in question to defend the new members sent by the outfitter in question
Yah it has to do with the cost paid vs actual cost.If they are buying the tag, how is it a tax writeoff? The "winner" purchases a product. I don't think that works up here. Shouldn't. If I buy a gun at a DU auction, I can't write off the amount paid as a gift. The donor gets the writeoff, not the buyer.
Sorry for derailment. Just curious.
Edit: I see it was explained on the next page of posts. Sorry. Thanks for explanation.
This is to all of the first time safari hunters/reporters and to members like @Mark Biggerstaff:Agreed.
If I read a report of someone who went to Africa first time I take it with a grain of salt regardless who the outfitter is.
Same for the hunter goes to Africa multiple times but sticks with the same outfit.
What's the yardstick?
You don't know what you don't know.
I've been to Africa multiple times and just spent 2 months there between Zim and RSA but I'm still learning and not only about hunting.....
I don’t think that post was written to dissuade anyone writing a hunt report. I enjoy reading most reports regardless the experience level. However, when it comes to taking a recommendation from a hunter, multiple trips to Africa where someone has had the ability to hunt multiple camps, regions, PHs is important to me. There are a few first time hunters who chose one of the best to for their first hunt. Then there are a few who could have had a much better experience than they did and don’t realize i but still make the recommendation as one of the best. I’m sorry Mark took offense to some comments made because I really respect him and appreciate his contributions. However, the “puff pieces” written in this thread are obviously first time African hunters and there are several established members who frequently present misinformation because they haven’t realized Africa is a huge continent. The hunting from one area to the next and one outfitter to the next can vary greatly. Almost everyone thinks their first African hunt is the best, when it’s really only the best they’ve done so far in most cases.This is to all of the first time safari hunters/reporters and to members like @Mark Biggerstaff:
Please do not let comments like this dissuade you from posting your hunt reports.
I have a feeling (and hope) that this type of opinion is in the extreme minority here on AH.
Really?This is to all of the first time safari hunters/reporters and to members like @Mark Biggerstaff:
Please do not let comments like this dissuade you from posting your hunt reports.
I have a feeling (and hope) that this type of opinion is in the extreme minority here on AH.
Exactly. If the first timer enjoys himself, that's what counts. And it can go a long way towards bringing him back. I have read some first timer reports on here that described great hunts. Most included photos of at least acceptable trophies, by my standards anyway. I have read way too many comments from the ubiquitous Stewart Granger types demanding that everyone treat their judgment like the Fifth Gospel just because they've made the circuit to different outfits and/or countries. That turns me right off.@375Fox and @Doubleplay
I am certain there are probably disingenuous reports posted here but those reports are not what I am referring to.
I am referring to the honest and genuine reports posted by first timers and long established members like Mark, MDWEST and Tom Leoni (who have hunted with same outfitter several times).
I have not read in any honest hunt report:
- This outfitter is the best.
- My PH is the best.
- The animals here are the best.
What I have read:
- The staff made me feel like family.
- My PH and trackers worked really hard.
- I am 100% satisfied with my experience here.
I mean what else is a first time or returning hunter supposed to say if that is the experience they had?
Says the new member sent by the Outfitter in question to defend the new members sent by the outfitter in question
Ah, I didn't catch that. Good eye.
Size and sex is not the issue being criticized. That wildebeest had a defective horn. It was a cull. Probably inbred. No one is saying the client is an idiot for shooting the thing. Seems he didn't know any better. If he doesn't know the outfitter had him taking out the garbage and paying for it, then how do we tell him he got screwed without pointing out the animals are garbage? And if he doesn't know he got screwed, he is likely to go back and get screwed again. The sad part is the outfitter obviously recruited this client to come on here and fight his battles for him, knowing full well he had him shooting culls as trophy animals. I hope the client is now wiser. He should not be upset with this forum for exposing his naivity. Being naive is what first safaris are about. It's expected. That's why we are required to have PHs when hunting. He should be upset with the outfitter, not singing his praises.