Shooting Accidents...

I would think that if there was a malfunction that occurred, that could be considered an accident. Most times this is not the case. It's usually human error, be it from lack of knowledge, lack of intelligence, or lack of giving a shit. I agree with Bruce and others that, as these are very preventable, they are not truly "accidents". You may have noticed that when I did use that word in my last post in this thread it was in quotation marks. That was for good reason.
 
the very heading of this thread gives a clue to human nature.
we tend to look for an escape clause when something goes wrong.
the truth of the matter is that there is no such thing as a shooting accident.
in fact there is only shooting negligence, and that must be called for what it is.
if every firearms handler had this mental approach, there would never be a negative incident.
we are weak in this area, and this weakness does not help a victim.
bruce.
People talk of 'near miss'. No such thing, just near hits.
 
So, is a near miss a hit?
And a near hit a miss?
A miss is a miss and a hit is a hit. If it gets pretty close it is a near hit. But how can you have pretty close to a miss - that implies it was a hit near the edge. It is still a hit!
 
A miss is a miss and a hit is a hit. If it gets pretty close it is a near hit. But how can you have pretty close to a miss - that implies it was a hit near the edge. It is still a hit!
This reminds me of a joke Ronnie Corbett used to tell: a man goes into a bar and he say's to the barman "I'll have a whiskey without". So the barman say's "Without what?" And the man say's " What haven't you got?"
 
I would think that if there was a malfunction that occurred, that could be considered an accident. Most times this is not the case. It's usually human error, be it from lack of knowledge, lack of intelligence, or lack of giving a shit. I agree with Bruce and others that, as these are very preventable, they are not truly "accidents". You may have noticed that when I did use that word in my last post in this thread it was in quotation marks. That was for good reason.
I agree to a point, but a malfunction with the muzzle pointed in a safe direction is still just a malfunction.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
70,265
Messages
1,567,979
Members
168,025
Latest member
missx
 

 

 

Latest profile posts

aminkus wrote on RAVEN ROCKS PRECISION's profile.
hello, i am looking for 404 Jeffery Hydro Solids ?
thank you very much
MHYOUNG 375 wrote on Marley7x57's profile.
That is not an Echols rifle but a clone as it has the Echols stock and all the bells and whistles. Lon Paul who built the rifle does great work.
SStomcat wrote on Mark458's profile.
Mark - I think you have a CZ 404 Jeff in synthetic stock. Is this factory spec. or you switched the stock? thx
SS
migrabill wrote on nyrifleman's profile.
Thank you for responding to my post. You have a PRE 64 and it is still new in box???! I would need to see pics and a price please.
 
Top