Sectional density question

Amon458

AH veteran
Joined
Dec 3, 2014
Messages
141
Reaction score
34
Location
North Dakota
Does sectional denisty matter as much on all brass or copper bullets or even steel jacketed bullets like hornady's dgs?
 
Lots of booze has been consumed around the fire discussing this.

Sectional density is the ratio of an object's mass to its cross-sectional area. It conveys how well an object's mass is distributed (by its shape) to overcome resistance.

To my understanding (I could be wrong) in pure theoretical terms this only applies to solids as once the projectile opens and how soon and large it opens throws sectional density out the window. Further monometals and bonded bullets hold together and don't fragment or lose mass and tend to penetrate deeper.

my $0.02
 
Lots of booze.!.!

I have not researched the topic much myself ,but I think lcq is right, being the two or three article's I did read all pertained and we're limited to solids.

Guessing the time I will do more research on this topic will be when I hunt a critter that could eat, stomp, or gore me. Interested to hear comments from those whom have hunted these critters, just to see if it matters much once you get above the 458 diameter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lcq
For me it's best said in simple layman's terms as "all things being equal" the greater the SD, the better the penetration.

exactly the key phrase "all things being equal"
 
For me it's best said in simple layman's terms as "all things being equal" the greater the SD, the better the penetration.

If we could just get the world to cooperate and keep "all things equal" :-)!
 
Karamojo Bell's requirement was a solid projectile 4 calibres long, ie a .284 calibre projectile needs to be 1.136" long.
 
For dangerous game I like all of my expanding bullets, monometal or bonded to have a sectional density of over 3.0 For elk, deer, etc. it's much less important. Our favorite bullet in our 270 Winchesters for deer and elk is the 150g Nosler Partition moving at least 2900 fps. In a pinch, I'd use that for grizzly as well.
 
Karamojo Bell's requirement was a solid projectile 4 calibres long, ie a .284 calibre projectile needs to be 1.136" long.
...and Bell wrote "no soft-point ever touched this gun!"
 
with solids, SD is very important. with soft points its less important but still has a place. its true when a bullet expands the SD changes but a bullet that starts with a better SD then its counterpart will likely still have a better SD then its counter part after they both expand. bullets with better SD are more likely to penetrate solid objects like bone. also a bullet with a high SD tends to be heavy for caliber which means it also has more mass to carry its energy after expanding.


-matt
 
  • Like
Reactions: lcq
With bullets of the same mass, sectional density is just the equivalent of the length of a bullet. So, a .22 caliber bullet and a .45 caliber bullet of the same composition with the same sectional density and in the shape of a perfect cylinder will be the same length, even though they will look vastly different in terms of length to width ratio. And two bullets with the same length to width ratio in these calibers will have vastly different sectional densities.

I think the answer to your question is "yes". If you had two bullets of vastly different mass due to composition, and they had the same external profile, the one of the less dense metal, and hence, lower sectional density would penetrate less, given identical bullet expansion.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
65,385
Messages
1,442,903
Members
135,790
Latest member
RosarioCub
 

 

 

Latest profile posts

'68boy wrote on Rare Breed's profile.
Wife and I will attend ah dinner in Nashville Friday night. Jay Sheets and wife Chris
crossfire3006 wrote on Hornedfrogbbq's profile.
An excellent AH member right here! I had a fantastic transaction with Hornedfrogbbq (I was the seller). His communication was first rate, payment was extremely fast, and I would have absolutely no reservations at all dealing with him again. Thank you, F!
Here we are, the last day of the show in Denver, it's been a good show but expecting a quiet day today. I will be back for-sure to do this show next year and maybe also do the one in Sacramento California.

On Monday I will be hitting the road driving from Denver and eventually make it down to Atlanta for the flight home.

its going to be a good year!
CraigV wrote on Rem280's profile.
Hi Rem280, Saw your post on getting selected for Idaho Elk. Do you have a zone(s) selected? I live in N Idaho, might be able to offer some ideas.

Cheers,

Craig
ghay wrote on Konrad.inc's profile.
Do you still have the Ruger 9.3x62?
 
Top