Politics

I know his work very well, and it simply follows a whole bunch of the fallacies first found in the Bell Curve. I literally do not have the time to type our a proper refutation of both his work and the theories he buys into.

If you like I am happy to point you to some of the books that have undercut his work time and again.

It has nothing to do with you personally, but I have followed these IQ debates for years and his work has no standing in any credible scientific community.

You may as well use Velikovsky for a source in interplanetary physics.
Actually, what I posted was an interview with him about a paper written by him and 2 others.
Sean Kennedy, Jason Richwine, and Steven A. Camarota on October 11, 2022

I suppose Sean and Steven are flat earthers and global warming denyers, so they can also simply be ignored as well? Especially Steven, as he's only testified on demographic issues around 30 times in his career. Yep, these guys are all lightweights.

AJ
 
This statistics debate reminds me of the Lefts faulty gun crime narrative. And how John Lott put every one of their talking points to bed.

More Guns, Less crime John Lott Jr.

IMG_2369.jpeg
 
Oh ya right WAB, only Canada can come up with “good” nuclear power. Just like they (Northern Dynasty Minerals LTD of Canada) can come up with a massive but “good” open pit gold mine in Alaska USA that, if built, will certainly threaten the world’s largest sockeye salmon run of the Kvichak River and all the associated fisheries and connected drainages of Bristol Bay.
 
Last edited:
The U.S. Navy has much more effective with less risk mine sweeping tools. But they take time. Also, this blockade forces the world to engage. Even China.

In Trumps mind it says. “We tried to negotiate. We are forced to take over the straits for you, the World. We don’t need it. But hey, we are here for you. “
I see. Vance claims this blockade is in response to Iran "blackmailing the world." Ummm ... And who's blackmailing the world now? If the US resorts to hijacking ships on the high seas that trade with Iran, what's to stop the nations losing their cargo from similarly confiscating US cargo and holding it ransom? Or US citizens? The US Navy and Coast Guard can't be everywhere at once. I think that is the message being sent by China's sabre rattling today. And I think they have every right to be irritated. Twenty-one hours is hardly a concerted effort at a diplomatic resolution. Just window dressing. But not surprising given the bizarre chain of events in Washington the last couple of weeks. When looking for foreign support Trump needs to think about the old saying "Catch more flies with honey than with vinegar". But that's not Trump. His "brand" is all about vinegar: name calling, filthy language, throwing around tariffs for personal reasons, and idolizing himself (understatement!). He alienates everyone ... except Russia and Israel. You know, the belligerent countries bombing their neighbors to pieces. It's too bad Trump didn't have the courage to answer his country's call during the Vietnam War. A taste of real combat might have given him a better perspective on how destructive belligerence can be. A genuine education would have helped too.
 
I mean Bill has been lying and cheating on her for decades… and she keeps hanging around…
What does that say about Melania?

Surprised to see you get into the gutter like that mdwest.
 
I see. Vance claims this blockade is in response to Iran "blackmailing the world." Ummm ... And who's blackmailing the world now? If the US resorts to hijacking ships on the high seas that trade with Iran, what's to stop the nations losing their cargo from similarly confiscating US cargo and holding it ransom? Or US citizens? The US Navy and Coast Guard can't be everywhere at once. I think that is the message being sent by China's sabre rattling today. And I think they have every right to be irritated. Twenty-one hours is hardly a concerted effort at a diplomatic resolution. Just window dressing. But not surprising given the bizarre chain of events in Washington the last couple of weeks. When looking for foreign support Trump needs to think about the old saying "Catch more flies with honey than with vinegar". But that's not Trump. His "brand" is all about vinegar: name calling, filthy language, and idolizing himself (understatement!). He alienates everyone ... except Russia and Israel. You know, the countries bombing their neighbors to pieces. It's too bad Trump didn't have the courage to answer his country's call during the Vietnam War. A taste of real combat might have given him a better perspective. A genuine education would have helped too.
What a ridiculous post. You think anyone in their right mind is gonna seize our ships?? 21 hours sounds like very little until you add it to 47 years. No argument here on the topic of Russia. As to your view on Israel, it really is despicable. There is no moral equivalence whatsoever between what Russia is doing and what Israel is doing..
 
Last edited:
I see. Vance claims this blockade is in response to Iran "blackmailing the world." Ummm ... And who's blackmailing the world now? If the US resorts to hijacking ships on the high seas that trade with Iran, what's to stop the nations losing their cargo from similarly confiscating US cargo and holding it ransom? Or US citizens? The US Navy and Coast Guard can't be everywhere at once. I think that is the message being sent by China's sabre rattling today. And I think they have every right to be irritated. Twenty-one hours is hardly a concerted effort at a diplomatic resolution. Just window dressing. But not surprising given the bizarre chain of events in Washington the last couple of weeks. When looking for foreign support Trump needs to think about the old saying "Catch more flies with honey than with vinegar". But that's not Trump. His "brand" is all about vinegar: name calling, filthy language, and idolizing himself (understatement!). He alienates everyone ... except Russia and Israel. You know, the countries bombing their neighbors to pieces. It's too bad Trump didn't have the courage to answer his country's call during the Vietnam War. A taste of real combat might have given him a better perspective. A genuine education would have helped too.
I hate to sound like a lawyer, but taking a ship during a blockade is not hijacking.

In fact a blockade is very well recognized under international law and the lLAC and IHC, and as far as my Trump skeptical eye can see he has instituted this one by the book. For instance a blockade must be announced to start at a specific time and must be announced publicly. We all knew precisely when this blockade was due to start.

Although I am not in those meetings, I would be willing to be that many western nations see the use of the blockade as a nice draw back from bombing the shit out of Iran and step back towards the recognized international order.
 
So California is trying to pass the "Stop Nick Shirley Act" which would effectively criminalize investigative journalism......

The bill was sponsored by the state attorney generals wife!
Cockroaches don't like it when a light is shined on them

I doubt a law like that would hold up in the Supreme Court.
 
Last edited:
Actually, what I posted was an interview with him about a paper written by him and 2 others.
Sean Kennedy, Jason Richwine, and Steven A. Camarota on October 11, 2022

I suppose Sean and Steven are flat earthers and global warming denyers, so they can also simply be ignored as well? Especially Steven, as he's only testified on demographic issues around 30 times in his career. Yep, these guys are all lightweights.

AJ
Look any organization that would try to rely on Richwine's work, or even hire him after he left the Heritage Foundation in disgrace, and I don't know if you know this, Richwine did work for Robert Spencer's white nationalist site, to question the work of the CATO institute and PNAS is literally scrapping the bottom of the barrel.

In the world of IQ studies and statistics Richwine is a pariah. And rightfully so.
 
Look any organization that would try to rely on Richwine's work, or even hire him after he left the Heritage Foundation in disgrace, and I don't know if you know this, Richwine did work for Robert Spencer's white nationalist site, to question the work of the CATO institute and PNAS is literally scrapping the bottom of the barrel.

In the world of IQ studies and statistics Richwine is a pariah. And rightfully so.
Given.

How about refuting the 3 items that I believe are correct above? Blame the messenger instead of addressing the facts?

AJ
 
  • Like
Reactions: RLD
Given.

How about refuting the 3 items that I believe are correct above? Blame the messenger instead of addressing the facts?

AJ
It's really just a question of length. PNAS and CATO concluded otherwise in properly done, well regarded work. As have several university studies at well respected schools. I honestly have to follow what I believe to be the proper scholarship since I don't have the time to recreate the numbers from the ground up.

You'll have to forgive my reaction but if you have followed the IQ-immigration studies/wars like I have when you see Richwine's name you take it about as seriously as AOC's thoughts on what to do with the well off.
 
It's really just a question of length. PNAS and CATO concluded otherwise in properly done, well regarded work. As have several university studies at well respected schools. I honestly have to follow what I believe to be the proper scholarship since I don't have the time to recreate the numbers from the ground up.

You'll have to forgive my reaction but if you have followed the IQ-immigration studies/wars like I have when you see Richwine's name you take it about as seriously as AOC's thoughts on what to do with the well off.
OK, so you don't want to take the time to refute the items that I listed. That is completely fine with me.

I'm sure there are a few things that AOC has said in the past that I'd agree with, but it would take me too much time to find those. I'll just ignore everything she says as is my normal approach to left wing loonies.

AJ
 
I hate to sound like a lawyer, but taking a ship during a blockade is not hijacking.

In fact a blockade is very well recognized under international law and the lLAC and IHC, and as far as my Trump skeptical eye can see he has instituted this one by the book. For instance a blockade must be announced to start at a specific time and must be announced publicly. We all knew precisely when this blockade was due to start.

Although I am not in those meetings, I would be willing to be that many western nations see the use of the blockade as a nice draw back from bombing the shit out of Iran and step back towards the recognized international order.
Presumably then, if other members of the international community do not recognize a proclaimed blockade, then they can proclaim their own blockades and start grabbing retaliatory cargo/ships on the high seas or in port? I guess if the US can do it anyone else can do it too, right. Just broadcast their own deadline first etc. Like I said, the US Navy is great but it can't cover the entire globe at once. And how would the markets react to the prospects of a blockade wars situation? I shudder to think. But that's the problem. No one is thinking. Jesus Trump has clearly lost touch with reality. Congress is trying to make sense out of chaos ... on too many fronts. The collection of incompetents transiting in and out of cabinet is not making their job any easier. To make matters even more complicated they have to deal with elections in a couple of months. How will Trump react when the inevitable happens and GOP gets crushed? Mark my words, Trump will come completely unhinged. He's obviously close to it now. His total focus will return to hunting down imaginary enemies for the next two years. That's how he will make America great again. The guy is easier to read than a third grade textbook.
 
Presumably then, if other members of the international community do not recognize a proclaimed blockade, then they can proclaim their own blockades and start grabbing retaliatory cargo/ships on the high seas or in port? I guess if the US can do it anyone else can do it too, right. Just broadcast their own deadline first etc. Like I said, the US Navy is great but it can't cover the entire globe at once. And how would the markets react to the prospects of a blockade wars situation? I shudder to think. But that's the problem. No one is thinking. Jesus Trump has clearly lost touch with reality. Congress is trying to make sense out of chaos ... on too many fronts. The collection of incompetents transiting in and out of cabinet is not making their job any easier. To make matters even more complicated they have to deal with elections in a couple of months. How will Trump react when the inevitable happens and GOP gets crushed? Mark my words, Trump will come completely unhinged. He's obviously close to it now. His total focus will return to hunting down imaginary enemies for the next two years. That's how he will make America great again. The guy is easier to read than a third grade textbook.
Well technically yes, anyone can declare a blockade at any time. Just like one can declare a war at any time. In fact a blockade is very specifically an act in furtherance of an armed conflict (ie war).

Doing either is a serious matter and it is usually only done within the context of a real shooting war.

Keep in mind you have to blockade some country, it is not just about grabbing ships on the high seas, it is about stopping a specific nation you are at war with from receiving and shipping goods. You can think of it like sanctions on steroids.

There is plenty about Trump's international policy I don't like, but this blockade is something I cannot criticize at all.
 
What does that say about Melania?

Surprised to see you get into the gutter like that mdwest.

Another Red Herring...

What does Hillary going onto social media beating up Vance about not brokering a 5 year deal that will ultimately fail like hers did have to do with Melania?

The point was simple.. Hillary has a habit of bashing others for things she clearly failed at.. shes talked about IT security breaches.. but she at the same time bit bleached hard drives that had evidence on them of her own security breaches, used a personal cell phone for classified phone calls, etc..

She preaches about getting in bed with cheating Iranians and bitches about Vances reluctance to get into a protracted negotiation with a regime that everyone on the planet knows lies and cheats.. while her own Iranian pet project proved to be an abject failure and one of the primary reasons we are where we are today..

The point (as originally stated) is she would be much better served sitting on the sidelines with a shut mouth.. she harms her own credibility, creates easy meme bait for the right, and she hurts any legitimate argument that the D's might otherwise make..


Whether Trump is a philanderer or not is of no relevance or consequence in this particular instance.. Its not like thats not well known and established.. and Trumps philandering has very obviously been the subject of more than a few jokes and memes...

Trump however in this case isnt telling the world to trust lying and cheating Iranians or condemning Vance for shutting down negotiations as soon as it was realized they were bullshitting and wasting everyones time..
 
Last edited:
LOL. ...Iran talking about totalitarianism?

Iran's president says deal will be reached if US abandons 'totalitarianism' | Live Updates from Fox News Digital https://share.google/qlw7HdBRyVE7bF2UP
US is not an Islamic totalitarian regime. Just has an elected president who now thinks he's God incarnate. I guess there's a line between the two but it's a little fuzzy. :D :D
 
Presumably then, if other members of the international community do not recognize a proclaimed blockade, then they can proclaim their own blockades and start grabbing retaliatory cargo/ships on the high seas or in port? I guess if the US can do it anyone else can do it too, right. Just broadcast their own deadline first etc. Like I said, the US Navy is great but it can't cover the entire globe at once. And how would the markets react to the prospects of a blockade wars situation? I shudder to think. But that's the problem. No one is thinking. Jesus Trump has clearly lost touch with reality. Congress is trying to make sense out of chaos ... on too many fronts. The collection of incompetents transiting in and out of cabinet is not making their job any easier. To make matters even more complicated they have to deal with elections in a couple of months. How will Trump react when the inevitable happens and GOP gets crushed? Mark my words, Trump will come completely unhinged. He's obviously close to it now. His total focus will return to hunting down imaginary enemies for the next two years. That's how he will make America great again. The guy is easier to read than a third grade textbook.

We actually have settled international law on the sea lanes.

So, back to my previously posted question. What if the US (mined the river) just decided to take over the St. Clair river between Michigan and Ontario Canada ? and didn’t allow any ships through.

This is literally why our US Navy was formed. To protect our sailing ships from the Barbary Pirates.

 
Last edited:

Forum statistics

Threads
67,277
Messages
1,492,665
Members
144,810
Latest member
сертификатсоответствиятртс0042011
 

 

 

Latest profile posts

channelkat wrote on NMAmateurHunter's profile.
FYI we need NM members! Please spread the word and join us if you can make it.
1775843806328.png
observe wrote on NZ Jack's profile.
Jerome, do you think my last post in rough camping must maybe shift as an article?
rayford445 wrote on Hunter-Habib's profile.
Good afternoon,

I'm trying to get in contact with Mr Butch Searcy. I have the opportunity to buy one of his rifles chambered in 577 nitro Express however the seller does not have any of the paperwork with the information about what ammunition or bullet weight was used to regulate it. I know he is not making firearms anymore but I wanted to reach out after seeing one of your post about him.
Daryl S wrote on mgstucson's profile.
Hi - the only (best) method of sending you the .375/06IMP data is with photographing my book notes. My camera died so the only way I can do it is with my phone. To do that, I would need your e-mail address, as this
new Android phone is too complicated to upload to my desk computer, which would be easier and to down-grade, reduce the file sizes.
Best wishes
Daryl
 
Top