- Joined
- Jun 14, 2015
- Messages
- 8,950
- Reaction score
- 25,667
- Location
- Shreveport, Louisiana
- Media
- 281
- Articles
- 5
- Member of
- NRA, DSC
- Hunted
- Nam, Zam, Zim,RSA (Eastern Cape & NW), Canada, NZ, Alaska, TX, LA, MO, OH, MT, ID, WA, WY
If we can step back from all of the cross Atlantic gnashing of teeth for a moment, it is interesting to watch Trump when he is playing shrewd politics.
He sends the Vice President of the United States as his head of delegation to the talks with Iran. Vance, of course, has the trust of the neo-isolationist wing of the Republican party. It puts Vance in a particularly interesting spot and useful one for Trump. Vance has no choice but to act forcefully in the interests of the US and its regional allies (note I did not simply say allies). If he is faced with a recalcitrant Iranian regime, it will be Vance who has to pick up the phone and tell Trump the talks are going nowhere.
It is a conversation that Trump will be able to lean on if he decides to take further military action, and though it will not affect the looney toon contingent podcasts, it will serve to mute a lot of the MAGA isolationist base while binding Vance more tightly to his actions.
It’s obvious that Iran is going to be a wedge issue this fall and in the 2028 elections.
It’s very telling that Trump wanted some of that stink on Vance but not Rubio.
Vance is clearly against this war. So Trump is throwing him into the arena, forcing him to get some scars and bruises.
Which is a great move. Rubio would be a much more formidable candidate.
I think @Red Leg and @Altitude sickness comments and observations are spot on with regards to Vance and the Iran negotiations.
I will add one comment. The location of the negotiations favors Iran. Islamabad is 1,000 miles from Tehran. The US delegation had to fly half way around the world. As we all, after a long flight (think Atlanta to Joberg), that last thing you are ready to do is enter a game of high stakes poker.
And a successful one with two successful children apparently your age. Though, they didn't learn about credit and financial responsibility in college.
(thinking it was the three year rule rather than three months)