Politics

If he had brought her in as his VP candidate he would likely be up by. seven or eight. Many on the farther right would have been upset, but who else were they supporting?

Maybe. She’s excellent on several issues and I hope she finds a place in a future Trump administration, but if you voted for Obamacare (she did) and have an F- rating from the NRA (she does), I don’t have much use for you on the top of the ticket.
 
The EU's digital dictator threatened Elon Musk over his interview with Trump. Warning Musk of hate speech or harmful content.
As if we have to tiptoe to the demands of the EU
Musk basically told them to stuff it.

If world leaders dont want a Trump presidency, but are fine with Harris, it tells you all you need to know

That the US is on its knees to the EU, at that point?
 
I amazes me how quick people dropped Biden and moved to Harris. What was it a month or less , Bidden went from being sharp as a tack to mentally incompentant, support switched from biden to harris seemingly over night with nary a soul questioning any thing
 
The whole world witnessed Bidens mental & physical decline. Democrat's and their constituents were probably in despair, facing a certain loss.
Along comes Harris, and now the entire base is reenergized with fresh hope, even if Harris is a radical socialist moonbat.

They don't care. The democrat party could give the delegates to Satan himself, and the braindead voter's wouldn't care. As long as it's a (D) with a pulse.
 
The whole world witnessed Bidens mental & physical decline. Democrat's and their constituents were probably in despair, facing a certain loss.
Along comes Harris, and now the entire base is reenergized with fresh hope, even if Harris is a radical socialist moonbat.

They don't care. The democrat party could give the delegates to Satan himself, and the braindead voter's wouldn't care. As long as it's a (D) with a pulse.
But this whole series of events showed me just how much people are willing to be lead like sheep and not think for themselves
 
I think they already did. I am still anticipating Iranian and proxy retaliation for Haniyeh's assassination in Tehran.
The dispute between Iran and Israel is very similar to how my wife and her sister argue. Neither can give up without having the last word. This has been happening with consistency since October 7th.
 

I am not sure why rent control keeps rearing its ugly head, but I hope we follow Argentina on this.
 
If he had brought her in as his VP candidate he would likely be up by. seven or eight. Many on the farther right would have been upset, but who else were they supporting?
Agreed. It is hard to understand the American voting mind, it is as if rationality and sense go on holiday for the year. Not just Trump and his shooting off his feet every chance he gets, but the general voter too. You are now down to the two choices, Trump or Harris, Republican or Democrat and yet still some of you Republicans are still looking at secondary or even petty issues, 'losing on principle'!!
Democrats seem far better at this game, they act strategically.
 
Maybe. She’s excellent on several issues and I hope she finds a place in a future Trump administration, but if you voted for Obamacare (she did) and have an F- rating from the NRA (she does), I don’t have much use for you on the top of the ticket.
I believe she has been red-pilled on the 2A. I'm not sure what the NRA would rate her today, but she isn't the same person on that issue that she was when she was in congress.
 
Imagine if you will

A world where 12 months from now, we are in a hot war with the new axis of evil. China, Russia, North Korea, and Iran.

And who do we send to match wits and strategies? With their known henchman and dictators.

Kamala and Tim ?

At least Walz could save the taxpayers money when negotiating for peace with XI. He probably knows the best places to stay in China.
 

I am not sure why rent control keeps rearing its ugly head, but I hope we follow Argentina on this.

While the GOP certainly isn't friendly to rent control, many on the right seem to be as ignorant of the iron laws of economics as the dem-controlled places don't seem to understand what raising the minimum wage or controlling rent is going to do. My best friend Steve (he's going to Africa with the missus and me this Saturday), a solid republican, is as good of an example as any.

I give you Texas' "anti-gouging" law (every state-wide elective office has been held by the GOP since 1998, I think). Steve thinks anti-gouging laws are great, and thinks I'm FOS on this.

2 days before Hurricane Harvey made landfall, in my little Houston suburb of 120K people, there wasn't a gas station left with any gas, and all grocery stores were out of water. A lot of people were not in a position to buy a little early and stock up. I don't recall the exact gas price at the time, but if the gas stations had been permitted to double or treble their prices, it would have discouraged a lot of people from filling up all the automobiles and portable gas cans they owned. Water was roughly $5/case. The lucky ones got in early and bought up all the water they could. At $20 - 40/case - and people think nothing of paying $1 or $2 for a bottle of water at the gas station when they stop to fill up and are thirsty - there would have been plenty for everybody. Temporary high prices in response to catastrophic events tend to encourage frugality for everyone.

I mean, it's "nice" that the grocery stores were still showing water at $5/case, even if they didn't have any to sell. Kinda hard to drink "nice" when you're really thirsty. We got 40 - 50" of rain from Harvey. Much of I-10 between Houston and Beaumont (about 70 or 80 miles) was under about 8' of water. While I-10 was impassable, not all roads and highways were. While we couldn't have been resupplied during the 4 days of biblical rain we got, if water and gas prices could have been raised, the suppliers would have taken risks, truck drivers and grocery store workers would have been happy for the overtime, and we'd have started getting resupplied with both within a day or 2 of the end of the storm. It took weeks for the supply of both to stabilize.

Food and water shortages mean little to me, I've been a prepper for 10 years now. I'm utterly immune to this economic stupidity, at least in this context.

Higher prices of course are an incentive for the providers of such things to take greater risks in anticipation of windfalls; and additional players are attracted to the market as well, ensuring a steady (and eventual over- ) supply of those goods, bringing the prices back down to normal.

Not having learned our lesson from that, the same thing started happening during the scamdemic, particularly with toilet paper of all things.

When you see chronic shortages of any consumer good/service (including labor), you can always rest assured that there is some set of laws or regulations at the heart of it. It's as monotonously predictable as gravity.

Few enough on the right seem to understand these things. If you understand them, you're the only dem I know who does.
 
Last edited:
I believe she has been red-pilled on the 2A. I'm not sure what the NRA would rate her today, but she isn't the same person on that issue that she was when she was in congress.
I suppose BHO, while running for first term, was labeled (or so portrayed by the MSM) as pro gun/hunter because he staged a photo op holding a shotgun? Similar to the current MSM remake underway of Camela's stance and track record. I watched a recent Gabbard interview about those subjects and she seems to have genuinely changed her mind on them. After all she WAS a Democrat and was expected to tow a line for funding and support on certain agendas especially in a flaming blue state like HI. She sounded like she got fed up with the Dem's trademark agendas to the point of changing parties. I have no problem with her current thoughts and policies
 
As to price fixing to prevent gouging, it can work both ways and often does with negative results. Gray-out Davis learned that lesson the hard way in California when he froze energy prices at a certain level only to find out within a short time costs started to fall and the state had to continue buying energy at the much higher, locked-in contract price. Simple economics really. Or increasing the minimum wage tends to hurt the people most who the politicians most pander to for votes. Higher dictated absolutes of minimum wages will result in more businesses going out of business, reluctance to start or expand business, lay-offs, fewer workers and higher costs for everyone.
 
You can usually tie any economic failure to government policies or politicians sticking their noses in where they have zero knowledge to be.

The 2006 housing bubble

Barney Frank and Bill Clinton forcing lending institutions to issue mortgages to people that could never pay them back.

Then blaming those same institutions for trying to keep themselves afloat somehow by bundling these losers and selling them.

Go back to the root cause and it’s usually a Do-gooder politician thinking he knows best.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
57,157
Messages
1,223,217
Members
100,245
Latest member
Juan Arroyo
 

 

 

Latest profile posts

TAG SAFARI wrote on mvalden's profile.
Wishing you a Happy Birthday!
TAG SAFARI wrote on K31's profile.
Wishing you a Happy Birthday!
TAG SAFARI wrote on davidg8480's profile.
Wishing you a Happy Birthday!
TAG SAFARI wrote on Daven22s's profile.
Wishing you a Happy Birthday!
TAG SAFARI wrote on bobdahunter84's profile.
Wishing you a Happy Birthday!
 
Top