Optic for .404 Jeffery - Variable Scope vs Red Dot

IA1865

AH member
Joined
Dec 8, 2022
Messages
45
Reaction score
121
Location
Dallas, TX
Media
3
Hunted
Minnesota, Texas, New Mexico, South Africa
I came into possession of a vintage .404 Jeffery that I plan on using for cape buffalo on my next trip to Africa. Wondering about the best optic to use for this given its intended purpose. I currently have a S&B Stratos 1.5-8x42 that I'd been planning on putting in Recknagel pivot mounts, with the idea that I'd be able to get a more precise first shot and then remove to use irons if needed while also being able to have a magnified optic for any PG species that pop up while we're walking around. I've been seeing some guys using the aimpoint ACROS on dg rifles however and am now exploring that idea. The rifle was re-stocked in the past so I'm not overly concerned about keeping originality, just want a solid working rifle with interesting history. One big pro of the Aimpoint would be that I don't have to modify the bolt at all while the S&B would add some weight to keep recoil down on a relatively light rifle for the caliber.

Would love to hear any opinions / experiences.

1737582920843.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • 1737582894095.jpeg
    1737582894095.jpeg
    372.2 KB · Views: 121
What are you going to do about the safety? The original safety will not work with a scope.
 
I would set up for both and then decide once I know the terrain to be hunted. Scope for open country and the red dot for thick cover.
 
Swarovski Z6i 1.7-10x42 or Z8i 1-8x24 , both are illuminated.
My "go to" on my 404
 
Beautiful rifle!.... I especially love the cocking piece sight.

Personally I would removed the blade rear sight from its dovetail and install an adapter that would allow you to mount an RMR sight with QD mount.

This would allow you to use the RMR and if something happened to it, you could QD it off the rifle and still have your back up rear iron sight on the cocking piece.
 
If you must upgrade, utilize the sight a deewayne mentioned. Man, if the recoil bothers you I would go with a PAST etc. as well if you can make LOP work. At least shoot it first sans a pad. Best idea is to tell your PH to get CLOSE! :-)
 
Granted, I missed the restocked part in initial perusal. Have at a quality pad. :-)
 
I wouldn’t do a thing to that rifle, practice with irons and hunt hard, get close, enjoy it as a classic.
 
If you must upgrade, utilize the sight a deewayne mentioned. Man, if the recoil bothers you I would go with a PAST etc. as well if you can make LOP work. At least shoot it first sans a pad. Best idea is to tell your PH to get CLOSE! :-)
I've shot it without a pad just using the hard horn buttplate that was on there, it's by no means unshootable but definitely not something I want to have a prolonged range session with. And given that it's been re-stocked (safari accident in the 70's in Kenya) I don't have any qualms about tossing a decelerator on there.
 
Beautiful rifle!.... I especially love the cocking piece sight.

Personally I would removed the blade rear sight from its dovetail and install an adapter that would allow you to mount an RMR sight with QD mount.

This would allow you to use the RMR and if something happened to it, you could QD it off the rifle and still have your back up rear iron sight on the cocking piece.
This^^^^^
It’s too nice to drill.
I’ve done similar to a 92 Winchester carbine, though mine needs an Allen key to remove the base..
Gumpy
 

Forum statistics

Threads
67,211
Messages
1,490,639
Members
144,510
Latest member
GeorgettaB
 

 

 

Latest profile posts

channelkat wrote on NMAmateurHunter's profile.
FYI we need NM members! Please spread the word and join us if you can make it.
1775843806328.png
observe wrote on NZ Jack's profile.
Jerome, do you think my last post in rough camping must maybe shift as an article?
rayford445 wrote on Hunter-Habib's profile.
Good afternoon,

I'm trying to get in contact with Mr Butch Searcy. I have the opportunity to buy one of his rifles chambered in 577 nitro Express however the seller does not have any of the paperwork with the information about what ammunition or bullet weight was used to regulate it. I know he is not making firearms anymore but I wanted to reach out after seeing one of your post about him.
Daryl S wrote on mgstucson's profile.
Hi - the only (best) method of sending you the .375/06IMP data is with photographing my book notes. My camera died so the only way I can do it is with my phone. To do that, I would need your e-mail address, as this
new Android phone is too complicated to upload to my desk computer, which would be easier and to down-grade, reduce the file sizes.
Best wishes
Daryl
 
Top