While I applaud Rigby in putting a classic blued steel and walnut sporting Mauser back in production, the new Big Game and Highland Stalkers aren’t really all that nice especially at the price point.
They (L&O) are simply producing a rifle that is “close enough” to an original 416 or 275 and leveraging the Rigby mystique to sell a production rifle at a custom rifle price.
I often hear, and it’s been noted on this thread, that modern production techniques allow gunmakers to produce a “better” gun. Maybe that’s true to a point, but only if they are implemented properly.
Case in point: this is a $20K used Rigby 416.
The barrel profile is not at all like a pre war 416.
The barrel band is bulky and sharp edged - unfinished looking IMO.
The fit and finish of the front sight sleeve is absolute shit! No self respecting custom gun maker would let THAT out of their shop.
I cannot tell if there is even any taper at all from the band to the muzzle.
I won’t even bother to show the very average inletting of the bottom metal - you can all go online and look at the Rigbys on offer to see that. There’s lots of them…
Again, a $20,000 USED rifle!
As for the Highland Stalkers, they all have the same barrel profile from 7X57 to 9.3X62! Not sounding very custom.
Winchester had at least three different profiles for their Model 70 and many variations within those profiles.
I don’t dislike Rigby. I now have and have had a few vintage Rigbys over the years.
I think my dislike of the current Big Game and HS rifles is that Rigby or whoever is at the helm, could have produced a more well executed product that is a closer or even exact replication of the original but for some reason just didn’t. I guess from a marketing standpoint they were correct.
View attachment 705829