Rule 303
AH elite
The destination is the Newly Weds or Nearly Dead's Island, Norfolk. I think we are far closer to the later than the first.
just for a week.The destination is the Newly Weds or Nearly Dead's Island, Norfolk. I think we are far closer to the later than the first.
just for a week.Great post. I love when people are loyal to a cartridge. I do it too. But it’s like when I posted about using a 338 lapua or 375 Ruger here and someone said they would laugh, but bring a 35 and I would be golden. I would shoot the same projectile at the same velocities and somehow it would be different from a different cartridge!If you have some evidence that case shape affects burning rate I would very much like to see it. If I am proven to be wrong I will gladly change my opinion and thank you for setting me straight.
Allow me to quote from The Big Book of Gun Gack (Barsness, 2015) page 309.
"A few years ago my friend Charlie Sisk, the well-known custom riflesmith from Texas, built a heavy-barreled .300 H&H and shot the rifle with a half-dozen handloads in his indoor range. He then rechambered the same barrel for the .300 WSM and tried the same powders and bullets. Muzzle velocities and strain-gauge pressures were carefully recorded. Guess what? The results turned out to be practically identical in every way, despite the extreme differences in case shape. The reason for this coincidence is simple: The powder capacity of both cases is practically identical."
I have, personally, seen that case shape has little, if any, effect when loading the 7x57 using 7-08 data and also when comparing identical bullets and powder charges in the .35 Whelen and .350 Rem Mag.
Kindest regards,
Walt
Great post. I love when people are loyal to a cartridge. I do it too. But it’s like when I posted about using a 338 lapua or 375 Ruger here and someone said they would laugh, but bring a 35 and I would be golden. I would shoot the same projectile at the same velocities and somehow it would be different from a different cartridge!
Makes sense.They were mentioning the 350RM as it the velocity is a lot lower then the other two. lets face it a 350 RM bullet is traveling a fair bit slower than a 338Lap or 375Ruger so less damage to skin and meat. Now if they said bring a 358 RUM or Shooting Times Western they would be in the 338 Lap territory.
A black bear is basically an extra furry deer with bigger teeth. They're no harder to kill than a good sized whitetail. They're not considered dangerous game.Makes sense.
Is a bear not considered a dangerous game? Would you not want a deader bear with worse hide than vice versa?
Good to know!A black bear is basically an extra furry deer with bigger teeth. They're no harder to kill than a good sized whitetail. They're not considered dangerous game.
The only belt I like is the on e holding my pants up. As I have said before there is nothing a belted magnum can do that a 100 year old non belted cartridge can't do just as well. 6.5 ORC necked up to 358? Just get a 35 Whelen.
A black bear is basically an extra furry deer with bigger teeth. They're no harder to kill than a good sized whitetail. They're not considered dangerous game.
I am gathering necessary components to ream a Ruger out to 35-284; the non-belted, rebated rim cousin of the 350 Rem Mag.Hello AH Folk...
I have been carrying .350 Rem Mag's while guiding and hunting for four decades plus... I have always found that it really punches up with performance on game. It has also done a pretty decent job of stopping bears on a few occasions. I have had several over the years, a Rem 673 and several Ruger Mark II's... my current is a Ruger M77 Mark II Stainless in a laminate stock, that I load 250 Partitions over W748 for.
Are there any other fans out there? What are you shooting and what are your preferred loads.
View attachment 586572
When I started this thread, this particular Ruger MKII .350 Rem Mag, was in factory original configuration with 22" barrel. After I sold a .358 Win carbine I had, I decided to Carbine the .350 RM, had the barrel taken down to 20" and added NECG sights front and rear... it is handler now and I gave up very little in terms of performance.I am gathering necessary components to ream a Ruger out to 35-284; the non-belted, rebated rim cousin of the 350 Rem Mag.
As someone so dedicated to the cartridge and with so many years of experience I’m curious if you have an opinion on optimal barrel length as it relates to cartridge performance and rifle usability in the bush. Mine will wear a 2-10x optic, if that matters.
THOSE ARE awesome love ruger 77s .I need one of those stocks on my 243 ruger that I am making into a 338 federal.My friend Duane had a left hsnded 350 rem mag made and a winchester 88 in 358-284;.The M77RLS .358 Carbine is the third from the top...View attachment 587034
Love these rifles!This is the new carbine configuration. .350 Rem Mag on top, .458 Win Mag on bottom.
View attachment 729166
@dgr416THOSE ARE awesome love ruger 77s .I need one of those stocks on my 243 ruger that I am making into a 338 federal.My friend Duane had a left hsnded 350 rem mag made and a winchester 88 in 358-284;.
I already have a 358 win sav 99 .I think speer 200 gr hot core bullets should be soft enough to use in 338 federal .This 243s barrel is big enought to rebore to 338 fed looking for lighter less kicking 338.I have a ton of 200 gr winchester power points also should be good love them.@dgr416
The best thing to do to a 243 is review or rebarrel.
Why the 338 fed and not the 358 win.
Woodleighs the only company to make projectiles for the 338 fed. Most other companies make projectiles for the higher velocity 338s that can be to hard.
My mate had a 338 fed that lived the 185gn TTSX.
Vob