Blue Tongue is EHD
I have had very similar experiences with Wildlife/DNR when calling in sick animals. I have even had them refuse to test an animal, tell me the disease does not exist in that area. I asked how many they tested, they said none. I laughed and said, "Of course it doesn't exist if you refuse to test for it." The next year the same agency had "breaking news" of that disease killing thousands of deer the next year.
I'll concede, blue tongue is; A Type of EHD.....of sort...
HOWEVER, locally here in SE Kentucky, OMG Don't get me started!, (in Tennessee), blue tongue disease is (considered much the same as comparative to a human getting a common cold) "normal".
Whereas this under publicized "brain worm disease" is much like shouting CWD; [In essence: Yelling fire in a gunpowder factory]. To locals, (in Kentucky) that subsidize domestic meat purchases with locally hunted game. On the proverbial flip side ( Tennesseans,....Wellll....we rural Tennesseans are, but we aren't, Of the same "mentality" as our "equal" Kentuckean Appalachian neighbors, "relatively speaking".
Just MY Opinion....OVERALL...UNTIL A HUMAN is questionably sickened from the wild game "they've" consumed.... that is when hunters/fishermen/women go to the local: msm, social media, or legal/court system... for restitution. No State Wildlife Agency will admit to the existence of or possible existence of:
And It is also MY Opinion, based on my personal experiences that, No State Wildlife Agency will admit:
1. A contagious disease in the local wildlife. Whether such contagious disease is a threat to humans or not.
2. The existence of a land or waterborne "species" whether believed to be extinct, eradicated, or (legally or illegally) introduced.
3. State Wildlife Agencies prefer not to educate the public on local population(s) of: exotic, endangered or threatened wildlife species until such species are through local, msm, social media, positively videoed and brought to the "masses" that such species exist.
Will any wildlife agency admit to such existence until "after the fact" . And only then will a wildlife agency take any "action(s)".
Apologies for the long winded rant as I could go on.
Bottom line is: Why do wildlife agencies:
1. Ask for public input,/report
2. Post various ways for the public to report,
3. Then these wildlife agencies ignore or out right fail to follow up on the publics' report of such incidences.
Makes no sense to me and others I know personally whom have made such legitimate reports.