Politics

Still trying to pin down for sure when carney must disclose his holds/portfolio/assets to the ethics commission. From what I can gather it will be 60 days from the current swearing in not the original swearing in on march 14th. So whenever he gets sworn in for pm this time plus 120 days before the public will have any idea if he’s working to further his interests or ours.
 
I won't be able shop like a billionaire on TEMU anymore......
1746332897111.png
 
I received my latest Imprimis yesterday. Some good points made. Luckily I think the younger team in DOD is quickly pivoting and realizing we need a homeland infrastructure to build things like ships, ammo, and new technology.

And to include smaller more nimble contractors

IMG_8766.jpeg
IMG_8765.jpeg
 
I received my latest Imprimis yesterday. Some good points made. Luckily I think the younger team in DOD is quickly pivoting and realizing we need a homeland infrastructure to build things like ships, ammo, and new technology.

And to include smaller more nimble contractors

View attachment 682730View attachment 682731
There is a rather huge difference and enormous leap in comparison between an anti-ship drone, cruise missile, or ballistic missile launched at a maneuvering target fifty plus miles offshore and a quad copter attacking a tank with four pounds of C4. Thank God we have the ability, the industrial expertise, and infrastructure to build the Aegis destroyers able to launch SM-2 and SM-6 missiles capable of bringing them down. Smaller more nimble contractors or great at components and one-offs, but have some serious difficulties (as in can’t) building large integrated systems of systems on ground, sea, or air platforms and hosting the production capacity to field them.
 
Last edited:
Absolutely, but imagine the tech and systems integration that has to go into designing and managing such swarms. I love this casual, the swarms will have a chat with each other and allocate targets. Right. No matter how many are in orbit, they are still a bullet trying to hit a bullet. Moreover, they are an already fired bullet trying to hit a bullet. The individual satellites will have to overcome their own trajectories for an intercept. That means fuel, propulsion, guidance, and targeting capability. Issues the majors like Northrop Grumman and Boeing have been working for more than a decade with DOD. The difference between a Space X WiFi provider and orbital interceptor is the difference between a Model T and a 2025 Tesla.
 
There is a rather huge difference and enormous leap in comparison between an anti-ship drone, cruise missile, or ballistic missile launched at a maneuvering target fifty plus miles offshore and a quad copter attacking a tank with four pounds of C4. Thank God we have the ability, the industrial expertise, and infrastructure to build the Aegis destroyers able to launch SM-2 and SM-6 missiles capable of bringing them down. Smaller more nimble contractors or great at components and one-offs, but have some serious difficulties (as in can’t) building large integrated systems of systems on ground, sea, or air platforms and hosting the production capacity to field them.
@Red Leg and @Altitude sickness thank you both for helping those of us without military experience or defense contracting experience know about these topics and challenges on the modern battlefield. It seems that things are changing at a fast pace. I hope our DOD and all the different companies cooperate to solve such complex issues and evolving needs. Perhaps the big companies will form partnerships with the smaller companies, where needed, to solve these challenges and deploy systems across the broad spectrum of fixed and mobile land-based, ocean-based and space-based platforms.
 
There are many electronic warfare systems (jammers...) developed and being developed to disable the guidance of drones. Much of it is proving successful so what't next in this 21st century arms race? Better guidance in the form of fiber optic cable up to 12 miles long!

This video is worth watching. This concept is proving effective in Ukraine.
 
@Red Leg how do you think South Korean military equipment stacks up on the modern battlefield? At this point any equipment is an improvement for Canada. Germany and France have also expressed interest in dealing with Canada but to my understanding South Korea is the only one to put in a bid. South Korea claims they can outfit the Canadian battalion in Latvia in as little as 12 months is that a realistic figure?
 
@Red Leg and @Altitude sickness thank you both for helping those of us without military experience or defense contracting experience know about these topics and challenges on the modern battlefield. It seems that things are changing at a fast pace. I hope our DOD and all the different companies cooperate to solve such complex issues and evolving needs. Perhaps the big companies will form partnerships with the smaller companies, where needed, to solve these challenges and deploy systems across the broad spectrum of fixed and mobile land-based, ocean-based and space-based platforms.
Absolutely. The large corporations tend to act as system integrators on major programs, partnering with smaller houses for key technologies. Let me give you a non-defense example so I don’t tread into a classified area. My old company, Northrop Grumman, won the prime contractor role to build the James Webb Space Telescope. As you might imagine, a host of different technologies went into the JWST, not all of which were core Northrop capabilities. What was core was the knowledge how to utilize and integrate different technologies to create a successful space vehicle for whatever purpose.

The primary subcontractors included Ball Aerospace who were experts on mirror technology, ATK (since acquired by Northrop) which builds fine control and support structures for optical mirrors, L3Harris for electronic integration, the University of Arizona for mirror analysis and testing, Geodetic Systems which specializes in orbital positioning, etc, etc. More than twenty-five direct subs participated as part of the bid team and many of them had subs on their team. The total industry team assembled by the prime entailed nearly a hundred different entities, many with unique technologies, and of course NASA.

Only three corporations attempted to bid the project, Northrop, TRW, and Ball Aerospace. Yes, Ball attempted to win prime (a real long shot for such a niche company) and were a member of the Northrop bid with their unique mirror technology.

I use this as an example to show how complex platforms (fighters, ships, tanks, and yes, swarms) require deep integration skills to bring the array of technologies together to make complex systems function.

The space swarm missile defense concept may very well prove a useful capability, but it will not be created by a startup in someone’s garage. It will be an extremely complex endeavor whatever new technologies are exploited. But a key technology may be provided by such a startup.
 
Last edited:
@Red Leg how do you think South Korean military equipment stacks up on the modern battlefield? At this point any equipment is an improvement for Canada. Germany and France have also expressed interest in dealing with Canada but to my understanding South Korea is the only one to put in a bid. South Korea claims they can outfit the Canadian battalion in Latvia in as little as 12 months is that a realistic figure?
Yes. They make a family of ground combat vehicles that are seemingly quite durable and user friendly. The tank looks like a three-quarter size M1 Abrams. You can google the specifications of it and the infantry fighting vehicles. To make that claim, I assume they have some recently retired ones sitting around for export. The trick will be interoperability with Canada’s current systems, the supply chain, and the unique maintenance requirement and infrastructure to support a completely new family of platforms.
 
Very informative and interesting. However, IMHO we need to continue to be on the OFFENSIVE and strike the manufacturing, storage and launch sites of our enemies' drones, ballistic and hypersonic missiles and transportation corridors whenever and as often as we can. Every other solutions to these threats are just defensive in nature and they never end and cost a FORTUNE over time. Again, just my laypersons humble opinion.
 
Tammy Bruce revealed that the Biden administration was keeping secret files on Americans that were considered a threat to the Democrat party and their agenda.
Doesn't surprise me at all.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
60,733
Messages
1,325,392
Members
112,631
Latest member
EveGna5860
 

 

 

Latest profile posts

This is what a hartbeest should look like......
WhatsApp Image 2025-05-04 at 09.20.35 (2).jpeg

Incredible 54" Kudu Bull Hunted In South Africa!!​

Hunting a 45” Sable Bull | South Africa | Elite Hunting Outfitters​

Another Great Trip, with Another Happy Client! Can't beat fair prices, for great trophies!
xb40 wrote on Ivorygrip's profile.
You have the wrong person. I have no idea what you are talking about..
 
Top