Have been researching the Woodleigh Weldcore Soft Point bullet, specifically the .366/320 gr. RN, for my bolt action 9.3x62mm Ruger African rifle.
This argument comes up a lot.
"The Weldcore Protected Point bullet - protects against the battering the Round Nose soft point bullet gets in the magazine due to heavy recoil."
I find this statement somewhat dubious.
Protected Point bullets, as a design, are generally chosen to mitigate Pointed Soft Point bullet magazine battering.
And, while the Weldcore PP is, in fact, a protected point design - It is my contention that it was chosen for its improved ballistic coefficients, and not because the Round Nose Soft Point bullet was being "battered."
Have ordered Round Nose bullets accordingly.
Any evidence to the contrary would be appreciated.
Red
This argument comes up a lot.
"The Weldcore Protected Point bullet - protects against the battering the Round Nose soft point bullet gets in the magazine due to heavy recoil."
I find this statement somewhat dubious.
Protected Point bullets, as a design, are generally chosen to mitigate Pointed Soft Point bullet magazine battering.
And, while the Weldcore PP is, in fact, a protected point design - It is my contention that it was chosen for its improved ballistic coefficients, and not because the Round Nose Soft Point bullet was being "battered."
Have ordered Round Nose bullets accordingly.
Any evidence to the contrary would be appreciated.
Red