As i normally browse through the threads when i am bored i noticed something interesting, as well as expected. There is a trend that i am noticing regarding bigger caliber rifles becoming the norm. This together with another thread i read about 3 favorite rifles, where i noticed a bunch of 30 06 and very few 308. Now this is dead beat horse as we all know. It is faster and packs a little more punch etc etc etc. But if that's the case then surely a 300win mag is better?
And if a 300win mag is better, the. Surely a 338 win mag beats the 300? And IF a 338 is better then a 300. Then The 375 is absolutely better than the 338.
O but lets not forget the 416 Rigby?
You see where i am getting. So this got me thinking that when do we decide "what enough" gun is?
Please feel free to give your feedback or Rant. Both are fun to read.
And if a 300win mag is better, the. Surely a 338 win mag beats the 300? And IF a 338 is better then a 300. Then The 375 is absolutely better than the 338.
O but lets not forget the 416 Rigby?
You see where i am getting. So this got me thinking that when do we decide "what enough" gun is?
Please feel free to give your feedback or Rant. Both are fun to read.
I have everything covered from the 22-250 to the 375 H&H, and depending on where I'm going and what I'm hunting is what dictates what gun & caliber I take. For what I can afford and most likely hunt I think I am will covered. If I ever have enough $$ to hunt an elephant, I may consider something bigger, or just go with the minimum caliber the 375 H&H. I know I have many overlaps in calibers, and I am ok with it, I love guns, and in some cases I own two of the same caliber.
