What Kind of bullet do you Professional Hunters use/prefer?

Proneshooter

AH veteran
Joined
Jan 22, 2017
Messages
112
Reaction score
178
Media
13
Hunted
Argentina, Zimbabwe x 3, South Africa, Wyoming, Montana, North & South Dakota, Texas
Not a PH but I know what my favorite PH uses. Woodleigh softs and solids in his 505. He has a large distain for the cup point solids, but likes the flat point solids his clients use.
 

mark-hunter

AH elite
Joined
Aug 14, 2016
Messages
1,883
Reaction score
2,386
Media
23
Articles
2
Hunted
Namibia - Kalahari, Namibia - Khomas highland
@IvW
Yes. I am limited in options of available ammo. Att the moment I have available PPU and Oryx in local shops. But, earlier you mentiioned it is too soft.
 

fourfive8

AH elite
Joined
Apr 27, 2017
Messages
1,751
Reaction score
2,919
Media
233
Hunted
USA, South Africa, Mozambique, Zimbabwe, Zambia, Botswana
Find and study cross sectioned photos or images of bullets. You can very well predict how they will probably act. The Norma Oryx, Remington Core-Lokt Ultra Bonded and Woodleigh Weldcore. ALL are simply thin jacketed, conventional cup and core designs that have been bonded. When they meet tough resistance they will expand rapidly. If they meet hard and/or tough resistance at close range at higher velocity, they can over expand and come apart and suffer inadequate penetration just like the non-bonded forms of same bullet. The only way to work around that with a thin jacketed, conventional cup and core bullet, for example on buffalo, would be to use a heavy-for-caliber bullet at lower velocity with a higher sectional density. I personally would rather use both a tougher bullet and heavy-for-caliber especially in the 375 for buffalo- just my opinion.

For DG like buffalo no matter if you are hunting or backing up, most everyone with experience recommends a tougher expanding bullet. Bonding is fine but it is no substitute for a tough design. There are three bullets out there that are very similar in design to the one IVW is recommending. These bullets are bonded, cup and core but have a thick base with heavy tapering jacket. They are: the missing-in-action in Sweden North Fork Soft Point, the RSA Rhino Soft Point and the US Trophy Bonded Bear Claw. A slightly more complex design with similar terminal characteristics would be the Swift A-Frame. The other common tough bullet for DG would be the Barnes TSX. Depending on where you are, most all ammo and components are becoming increasingly difficult to find and options are thinning rapidly. International availability is another complex hurdle.

I've added a couple of pics to illustrate the difference between a "soft" bonded bullet and a "tough" bonded bullet. I have experience with both and I will never again use the soft design, bonded or not for any big game much less something like a buffalo. Should be easy to predict the terminal potentials based on the design. The Norma Oryx cross section looks nearly identical to the Remington Core-Lokt Ultra. The Rhino Soft Point is very similar in design to the TBBC.

Core-Lokt Ultra.png





images-2.jpeg
 
Last edited:

Thumper Mcgee

AH veteran
Joined
Dec 10, 2020
Messages
142
Reaction score
160
Member of
NRA
Hunted
U.S
Could you use the norma Oryx on leopard
Find and study cross sectioned photos or images of bullets. You can very well predict how they will probably act. The Norma Oryx, Remington Core-Lokt Ultra Bonded and Woodleigh Weldcore. ALL are simply thin jacketed, conventional cup and core designs that have been bonded. When they meet tough resistance they will expand rapidly. If they meet hard and/or tough resistance at close range at higher velocity, they can over expand and come apart and suffer inadequate penetration just like the non-bonded forms of same bullet. The only way to work around that with a thin jacketed, conventional cup and core bullet, for example on buffalo, would be to use a heavy-for-caliber bullet at lower velocity with a higher sectional density. I personally would rather use both a tougher bullet and heavy-for-caliber especially in the 375 for buffalo- just my opinion.

For DG like buffalo no matter if you are hunting or backing up, most everyone with experience recommends a tougher expanding bullet. Bonding is fine but it is no substitute for a tough design. There are three bullets out there that are very similar in design to the one IVW is recommending. These bullets are bonded, cup and core but have a thick base with heavy tapering jacket. They are: the missing-in-action in Sweden North Fork Soft Point, the RSA Rhino Soft Point and the US Trophy Bonded Bear Claw. A slightly more complex design with similar terminal characteristics would be the Swift A-Frame. The other common tough bullet for DG would be the Barnes TSX. Depending on where you are, most all ammo and components are becoming increasingly difficult to find and options are thinning rapidly. International availability is another complex hurdle.

I've added a couple of pics to illustrate the difference between a "soft" bonded bullet and a "tough" bonded bullet. I have experience with both and I will never again use the soft design, bonded or not for any big game much less something like a buffalo. Should be easy to predict the terminal potentials based on the design. The Norma Oryx cross section looks nearly identical to the Remington Core-Lokt Ultra. The Rhino Soft Point is very similar in design to the TBBC.

View attachment 384711




View attachment 384710
 

mark-hunter

AH elite
Joined
Aug 14, 2016
Messages
1,883
Reaction score
2,386
Media
23
Articles
2
Hunted
Namibia - Kalahari, Namibia - Khomas highland
@fourfive8
Thanks for thoroguh answer.
So far, the buffalo list of bullets may be defined as follows:
Sweden North Fork Soft Point, the RSA Rhino Soft Point, US Trophy Bonded Bear Claw, Barnes TSX.
Based on other comment on forum, swift A frame, as well?
Those would be acceptable?
On the other hand, Hornady DGS and DGX have questionable reputation, so far?
 

fourfive8

AH elite
Joined
Apr 27, 2017
Messages
1,751
Reaction score
2,919
Media
233
Hunted
USA, South Africa, Mozambique, Zimbabwe, Zambia, Botswana
Yes, those are the most commonly recommended expanding type bullets for DG like buffalo. North Fork was bought by a company in Sweden and was supposed to be preparing to produce the excellent line of North Fork Bullets for export. That's been over a year ago, so who knows? Rhino is a company in South Africa and I've never seen them available here in the US. TBBC bullets are available in the US but given the current situation in the market, you have to really search and they are expensive.

If I were setting up for buffalo using an expanding bullet out of the 375, I'd go with a 300 gr or possibly even a 350 gr of one these types of bullets.

As to the DGX? Hornady really fouled up their future market, when they didn't do adequate homework on the original DGX. They remained in denial too long especially in this age of instant communication among the hunting community. Confidence, once lost, is hard to regain. The original iteration of the DGX relied on a very flawed design idea- a thin, hard steel jacket would take the place of a thick, malleable tapered copper jacket for deep penetration with predicable controlled expansion as expected for a DG bullet. I have tested both the original DGX and the new bonded DGX with identical loads, velocities, weights in a tough, standardized media of 100% water saturated phone book paper. The original DGX failed badly, fragmenting with very poor penetration. The new bonded DGX expanded properly with 8, evenly separated petals, reflecting the internally skived nose jacket, The bonding kept the core attached to the jacket with the jacket supporting a proper mushroom shape at the terminus. The penetration was straight line and the depth was on par with other tough expanding bullets similar to those mentioned earlier.

Given current supply problems you might also look at CEB and Peregrine. The limited testing I've done on CEBs indicates they perform as advertised. I have no experience with Peregrine and like Rhino I've never seen them available here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WAB

WAB

AH legend
Joined
Oct 8, 2015
Messages
2,956
Reaction score
6,501
Location
Alabama
Media
94
Hunting reports
Africa
5
USA/Canada
1
Member of
DSC, NRA, SCI
Hunted
Zambia, Botswana, Mozambique, South Africa, Zimbabwe, Namibia, Scotland, England, Canada, Alaska, Ireland
Yes, those are the most commonly recommended expanding type bullets for DG like buffalo. North Fork was bought by a company in Sweden and was supposed to be preparing to produce the excellent line of North Fork Bullets for export. That's been over a year ago, so who knows? Rhino is a company in South Africa and I've never seen them available here in the US. TBBC bullets are available in the US but given the current situation in the market, you have to really search and they are expensive.

If I were setting up for buffalo using an expanding bullet out of the 375, I'd go with a 300 gr bullet from this list: North Fork, Rhino, TBBC, A-Frame, TSX

As to the DGX? Hornady really fouled up their future market, when they didn't do adequate homework on the original DGX. They remained in denial too long especially in this age of instant communication among the hunting community. Confidence, once lost, is hard to regain. The original iteration of the DGX relied on a very flawed design idea- a thin, hard steel jacket would take the place of a thick, malleable tapered copper jacket for deep penetration with predicable controlled expansion as expected for a DG bullet. I have tested both the original DGX and the new bonded DGX with identical loads, velocities, weights in a tough, standardized media of 100% water saturated phone book paper. The original DGX failed badly, fragmenting with very poor penetration. The new bonded DGX expanded properly with 8, evenly separated petals, reflecting the internally skived nose jacket, The bonding kept the core attached to the jacket with the jacket supporting a proper mushroom shape at the terminus. The penetration was straight line and the depth was on par with other tough expanding bullets similar to those mentioned earlier.

Given current supply problems you might also look at CEB and Peregrine. The limited testing I've done on CEBs indicates they perform as advertised and I have no experience with Peregrine.

Excellent analysis. My experience with buffalo is limited to the TBBC, A-Frame and original iteration of the DGX. I fully endorse the TBBC and A-Frame. Based on their performance on a buffalo in Mozambique, I feel fortunate that the original iteration of the DGX didn’t get me killed.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
37,275
Messages
710,162
Members
66,354
Latest member
FidelBalco
 

 

 

Latest profile posts

cal pappas wrote on Mnelson2's profile.
Nelson. Is this message a PM format. I want to send you my email, but don't know if this is the cirrect way to do it. I'm at <pappas@mtaonline.net> Send me an email with your phone and I will call you about a skull I have. I went to school in Boston and am from Bernardston in the west part of the state. Moved to Alaska in 1984 adn never looked back.
BeeMaa wrote on Justbryan's profile.
Sold a Blaser scope mount to him. He was a pleasure to do business with.
BeeMaa wrote on 375Fox's profile.
Sold a Blaser scope mount to him. Was a pleasure to do business with.
Tundra Tiger wrote on Alaska Luke's profile.
Hi Luke. Just saw your message. I am in Dillingham, and have been since 2002. I took an elementary teaching gig here, taught here five years, and then got a job with Togiak National Wildlife Refuge as their education and outreach specialist. Recently I just got a promotion and now I'm the Visitor Services Manager. Prior to DLG I spent 6 years teaching for Lake and Pen in Nondalton.
Serbian Hunter wrote on Tundra Tiger's profile.
Hi TT
I am glad you found some useful info in my posts. Hard cast WFN with GC will do the job fine. I trust Veral Smith (owner of LBT company) - I believe that he can provide you with some finest HC bullets. Many companies are coping his design. I can help you from here in developing max loads (40.000psi) just let me know which powder you are using (I use Quick Load software which turns to be very reliable).
 
Top