I used the Weaver top mount base #45 for the Mauser 98, along with the corresponding front base.What make bases? S&S? I had to similarly carve out allowance for the hump underneath the first CCOP rail I used for my Czech 98 Mauser project. Donor action was already tapped for three hole one-piece bases. It took a while but eventually I got a tight fit. I think the rail was for commercial Mauser. I switched to 30mm tube scope and it mounted a little high so I found a lower discontinued Weaver base. It only has two slots for rings and a very short loading cutout. Works okay but I'd like to change ring location and widen the cutout. Moving the slots is easy enough but extending the cutout would cut into existing slots and weaken the rail. I have a local machinist who's skilled enough to make me another one using this one as a pattern. He can machine the rear base like CCOP's and I'll carve out what I need to fit around the hump rather than leave a gap like this one.
View attachment 761632
Thanks. Might be worth buying a pair and messing with them to see if I can make them work on my rifle. The custom fit on rear base would need to be very snug for only one screw. Maybe it might work ... but they are aluminum. Probably not. I used a CCOP rail for my plains game Springfield because the scope tube was short and no one makes quick detach extended rings. But the screw holes in the rail did not match up with holes my dad tapped in the receiver for two piece Weaver bases. So I drilled a new hole in the rail for one screw in forward end of rail (no room for second forward screw). Springfield receivers only have one screw for rear whether two piece bases or rail (rear base fits into dovetail for military rear sight). Consequently this scope base/rail is attached to the receiver with only two screws. But it is one-piece rigid steel and the rifle recoil is only 30-06. Two screws should be sufficient.I used the Weaver top mount base #45 for the Mauser 98, along with the corresponding front base.
![]()
Weaver Top Mount Scope Base #45 Gloss
Each Weaver base is machined to the tightest tolerances for a custom fit. They are designed to fight the effects of recoil with a square-cut notch that...www.midwayusa.com
I agree; the scope sits a bit high. But this is a knockaround gun that I picked up on the cheap, so I was just using what spare parts I had laying around. If I decide to keep it long term, I may decide to get some lower rings in the future.Thanks. Might be worth buying a pair and messing with them to see if I can make them work on my rifle. The custom fit on rear base would need to be very snug for only one screw. Maybe it might work ... but they are aluminum. Probably not. I used a CCOP rail for my plains game Springfield because the scope tube was short and no one makes quick detach extended rings. But the screw holes in the rail did not match up with holes my dad tapped in the receiver for two piece Weaver bases. So I drilled a new hole in the rail for one screw in forward end of rail (no room for second forward screw). Springfield receivers only have one screw for rear whether two piece bases or rail (rear base fits into dovetail for military rear sight). Consequently this scope base/rail is attached to the receiver with only two screws. But it is one-piece rigid steel and the rifle recoil is only 30-06. Two screws should be sufficient.
Your scope looks quite high. You might want to try low rings. Be advised "low" is not standard among ring manufacturers. Somewhere online I found a chart of height for each make of rings. A lot of variation!
Nice. Appears to also have been tapped for side mount rear peep sight?My lightly customized Husqvarna in 9.3x62 is one of my favorite rifles. Cost me a lot less than a Rigby. I’ve since swapped the Leupold variable for a Leupold 3x.
View attachment 762176
I refer to this Danzig sporter Mauser as my poor man’s pre war Rigby. Perhaps call RJ Renner for help on sights and stock help View attachment 761614View attachment 761613View attachment 761615
