Okay. Maybe too many syllables for you? I'll simplify. Sullivan = influencer = his videos do not interest me. I have tripped on them a couple of times. Finished one and that was enough. He's not the only one. Generally I find online outdoors influencers phony and obnoxious. Like old days used car salesmen. Or gals peddling real estate (Ugh! Well, maybe not THAT phony).You're comment, as usual, makes no sense.
Hahaha an influencer. The man is a PH since 1989 in Tanzania. If making videos as a side business makes you an influencer than a lot of PH's are influencers by your definition.Sullivan = influencer =
Very much agree with your words here @Hunter-Habib . We are too often our own worst enemyOur hunting community can be extremely vindictive, hateful, judgmental, self righteous & jealous. We don’t like seeing others successful, no matter how eloquent we act. And if somebody hunts in a way different from us… well, God help them. There’s no nice way to say it. We might deny it, but deep in our hearts… we know that it’s true.
If you want to form an opinion on a hunting celebrity, then YOU are the best judge. Nobody else. A hundred people online might dislike somebody, but that disliked person may actually be the nicest guy in the world to you. And that's what should matter.
I'll provide some insight about Mark Sullivan. A lot of people hate him (including spreading around tasteless garbage such as him losing his hunting license in Tanzania). That's fine. But you should personally take a look at the man and form your own opinions on him rather than use other people's opinions as a litmus test.
Mark is a friend of mine. We have had several exchanges over the years. We know each other's families and friends circles well. Yes, it's true. I don't necessarily agree with everything he says. Hunting with him is definitely not for everybody (especially physically unfit clients who want to take game out from as far as possible). But in my opinion, he's a good man. And a good hunter. And nowhere as pompous in real life as he makes himself out to be on camera. Sure, he likes to boast. I personally don't. But he has earned that right through 43 years (and counting) of hard work.
I'll tell you a small story about Mark. A young local hunter here (who will probably not be able to afford an African safari for several more years, let alone with Mark) wrote Mark a fan letter in 2022. Mark sent the South Bengali boy both of his books (autographed) through courier from Arizona. Along with his DVDs and a safari cap. I was absolutely mind blown by this gesture.
In Tanzania, Mark has (on more than one occasion) gone above and beyond to financially help fellow white hunters in trouble. Even trackers on a couple of occasions. In my opinion, SCI did the best thing by finally allowing Mark back to all of their programs, starting from 2023 onwards.
See the best in a person rather than the worst. And see it for yourself, rather than relying upon other people's opinions. Life's too short and we hunters already have plenty of enemies out there. Those who actually hunt(ed) with Mark Sullivan have quite positive feedback about him.
Yes, there’s a little known reason why Mark contends with more wounded Cape buffalo than other white hunters do. The reason is because he is probably the only bug name in the hunting industry who exclusively prefers solid bullets for Cape buffalo hunting. He even mandates that his clients use them. I’ve actually spoken to him about this; telling him that (in my humble experience) a premium grade soft point can take out a Cape buffalo with a heart-lung shot quicker than any solid can these days. But Mark exclusively prefers the solid. In recent years, he’s come to see the light. He now has his clients take the first shot with a Barnes TSX all-copper hollow point.
He’s also evolved his strategies over the years in order to increase his client’s chances of success. Early in his career, he used to stipulate that his clients only employ double rifles. Nowadays, he has them bring a heavy double rifle as well as a telescopic sighted .375 Holland & Holland Magnum magazine rifle. Depending upon his client’s physical limitations and the way the hunting scenario unfolds, he advises them on which rifle to use.
Yes, Mark says a lot of things that might rub off on a sensitive person the wrong way. He once told me “Bolt action rifles are for women & small children”. He also often quips that the “.470 Nitro Express is a fine ladies’ gun”. But it’s all in good humor. He has many, many clients who come to hunt with him; armed with .470 Nitro Express (or smaller caliber) rifles. He has often invited me to go on Safari with him… knowing full well that I use a .375 Holland & Holland Magnum Remington Model 700. If you’re the kind of person who takes every word literally, then Mark is definitely not for you.
76 years young (3 years older than I am) and he still actively hunts in the wilds of Tanzania with a .600 Nitro Express John Wilkes boxlock non ejector (formerly the property of the late Cal Pappas). I wish him well for all of his future endeavors.
P.S: Mark has stopped more than a few lion & leopard charges. But given the pricing of lion hunts in Tanzania, relatively few of his clients opt to pursue lion. I assure you all. In the last 35 years, Mark has had far more clients who bagged all of their own game rather than clients who needed him to step in. I know many of them by name.
Couldn’t agree more. Contrast him with how Buzz Charlton acts in his videos. Always complimenting the hunter obviously trying to help the hunter be the center of the action. Very mild mannered despite being one of the most accomplished elephant hunters I’ve heard of.Here's your answer as to "aren't most of us that engage in dangerous pursuit" cocky? (* It's also the answer as to why so many dislike him ). The answer is, No. You don't have to be that cocky (or despite your assertion- arrogant) to hunt dangerous game. It's this singular trait of his that screams he is willing to engage in riskier behavior than other great professional hunters no matter how cocky they may be otherwise; thus, IMO I don't consider him one of the elite or best. Again, my opinion of course
Carry On
Buzz understands that it is the client’s hunt, not his hunt. PHs and guides are in the service business and success is a successful client.Couldn’t agree more. Contrast him with how Buzz Charlton acts in his videos. Always complimenting the hunter obviously trying to help the hunter be the center of the action. Very mild mannered despite being one of the most accomplished elephant hunters I’ve heard of.
I much prefer and am attracted to Buzz’s approach.
Once again, Mr. Ontario Syllable, you're response is woefully inadequate. You claim "Sullivan = Influencer - his videos do not interest me." You're mistaken if you think Mark Sullivan is an influencer, and I have never heard another person make that claim. He's a professional hunter who has produced videos in an era before influencers as we know them today existed. As hard as that may be for you to understand, it's the truth. But I'm sure you've killed more dangerous game than Mark, have hunted Africa more times than him, and have more people who respect you and listen to you for real-world, practical advice, so you know better than all of us. In your original comment, you said "I prefer to get my knowledge from hands on [SIC] experience, textbooks, or from other peasants like myself..." Who would ask you for advice on dangerous game hunting? I read the snarky comments you make in posts. I don't ever see anyone on this forum asking you for advice. To that end, send me the names of the books you have written, the DVDs you have produced, the names of the clients you have guided in Africa, and the articles, websites, forums, etc., where people talk about you and your hunting skills and knowledge, your firearms skills, and your legacy. There's a reason a video wasn't made about you.Okay. Maybe too many syllables for you? I'll simplify. Sullivan = influencer = his videos do not interest me. I have tripped on them a couple of times. Finished one and that was enough. He's not the only one. Generally I find online outdoors influencers phony and obnoxious. Like old days used car salesmen. Or gals peddling real estate (Ugh! Well, maybe not THAT phony).Influencer videos are typically staged and fakey.
...., but that disliked person may actually be the nicest guy in the world to you. And that's what should matter.
I don't hate Sullivan, but the persona that comes across in the videos I've seen of him are off-putting to me, and to a great many people. It's difficult for me to imagine the sort of client who would be attracted by that sort of marketing.Our hunting community can be extremely vindictive, hateful, judgmental, self righteous & jealous. We don’t like seeing others successful, no matter how eloquent we act. And if somebody hunts in a way different from us… well, God help them. There’s no nice way to say it. We might deny it, but deep in our hearts… we know that it’s true.
If you want to form an opinion on a hunting celebrity, then YOU are the best judge. Nobody else. A hundred people online might dislike somebody, but that disliked person may actually be the nicest guy in the world to you. And that's what should matter.
I'll provide some insight about Mark Sullivan. A lot of people hate him (including spreading around tasteless garbage such as him losing his hunting license in Tanzania). That's fine. But you should personally take a look at the man and form your own opinions on him rather than use other people's opinions as a litmus test.
Mark is a friend of mine. We have had several exchanges over the years. We know each other's families and friends circles well. Yes, it's true. I don't necessarily agree with everything he says. Hunting with him is definitely not for everybody (especially physically unfit clients who want to take game out from as far as possible). But in my opinion, he's a good man. And a good hunter. And nowhere as pompous in real life as he makes himself out to be on camera. Sure, he likes to boast. I personally don't. But he has earned that right through 43 years (and counting) of hard work.
I'll tell you a small story about Mark. A young local hunter here (who will probably not be able to afford an African safari for several more years, let alone with Mark) wrote Mark a fan letter in 2022. Mark sent the South Bengali boy both of his books (autographed) through courier from Arizona. Along with his DVDs and a safari cap. I was absolutely mind blown by this gesture.
In Tanzania, Mark has (on more than one occasion) gone above and beyond to financially help fellow white hunters in trouble. Even trackers on a couple of occasions. In my opinion, SCI did the best thing by finally allowing Mark back to all of their programs, starting from 2023 onwards.
See the best in a person rather than the worst. And see it for yourself, rather than relying upon other people's opinions. Life's too short and we hunters already have plenty of enemies out there. Those who actually hunt(ed) with Mark Sullivan have quite positive feedback about him.
Yes, there’s a little known reason why Mark contends with more wounded Cape buffalo than other white hunters do. The reason is because he is probably the only bug name in the hunting industry who exclusively prefers solid bullets for Cape buffalo hunting. He even mandates that his clients use them. I’ve actually spoken to him about this; telling him that (in my humble experience) a premium grade soft point can take out a Cape buffalo with a heart-lung shot quicker than any solid can these days. But Mark exclusively prefers the solid. In recent years, he’s come to see the light. He now has his clients take the first shot with a Barnes TSX all-copper hollow point.
He’s also evolved his strategies over the years in order to increase his client’s chances of success. Early in his career, he used to stipulate that his clients only employ double rifles. Nowadays, he has them bring a heavy double rifle as well as a telescopic sighted .375 Holland & Holland Magnum magazine rifle. Depending upon his client’s physical limitations and the way the hunting scenario unfolds, he advises them on which rifle to use.
Yes, Mark says a lot of things that might rub off on a sensitive person the wrong way. He once told me “Bolt action rifles are for women & small children”. He also often quips that the “.470 Nitro Express is a fine ladies’ gun”. But it’s all in good humor. He has many, many clients who come to hunt with him; armed with .470 Nitro Express (or smaller caliber) rifles. He has often invited me to go on Safari with him… knowing full well that I use a .375 Holland & Holland Magnum Remington Model 700. If you’re the kind of person who takes every word literally, then Mark is definitely not for you.
76 years young (3 years older than I am) and he still actively hunts in the wilds of Tanzania with a .600 Nitro Express John Wilkes boxlock non ejector (formerly the property of the late Cal Pappas). I wish him well for all of his future endeavors.
P.S: Mark has stopped more than a few lion & leopard charges. But given the pricing of lion hunts in Tanzania, relatively few of his clients opt to pursue lion. I assure you all. In the last 35 years, Mark has had far more clients who bagged all of their own game rather than clients who needed him to step in. I know many of them by name.
I hesitate to to disagree with you my honorable friend and I’ve no doubt Mr Sullivan has stopped lion and leopard charges, but not on video that I’m aware of. I’ve a hunch that no way would Mr. Sullivan knowingly provoke a lion and/or a leopard charge, predators that are twice as fast as buffalo and a much smaller target, it would be in my humble opinion almost suicidal, however there is no doubt in my mind that he feels supremely confident in stopping a buffalo and/or hippo charge, provoked or not, his skill at arms and reflexes giving him the advantage with those slower moving DG.P.S: Mark has stopped more than a few lion & leopard charges. But given the pricing of lion hunts in Tanzania, relatively few of his clients opt to pursue lion. I assure you all. In the last 35 years, Mark has had far more clients who bagged all of their own game rather than clients who needed him to step in. I know many of them by name.
Okay, I'll make it simpler: he makes money off his videos and books = influencer. He's also a PH. So what? It's easy enough to find lots of videos of other guides/PHs who are marketing themselves and/or sponsors with YouTube videos, blogs, books, magazine articles, etc. Not all PHs are influencers and not all influencers are PH/guides. Where did you get the idea that the two cannot be the same?Once again, Mr. Ontario Syllable, you're response is woefully inadequate. You claim "Sullivan = Influencer - his videos do not interest me." You're mistaken if you think Mark Sullivan is an influencer, and I have never heard another person make that claim. He's a professional hunter who has produced videos in an era before influencers as we know them today existed. As hard as that may be for you to understand, it's the truth. But I'm sure you've killed more dangerous game than Mark, have hunted Africa more times than him, and have more people who respect you and listen to you for real-world, practical advice, so you know better than all of us. In your original comment, you said "I prefer to get my knowledge from hands on [SIC] experience, textbooks, or from other peasants like myself..." Who would ask you for advice on dangerous game hunting? I read the snarky comments you make in posts. I don't ever see anyone on this forum asking you for advice. To that end, send me the names of the books you have written, the DVDs you have produced, the names of the clients you have guided in Africa, and the articles, websites, forums, etc., where people talk about you and your hunting skills and knowledge, your firearms skills, and your legacy. There's a reason a video wasn't made about you.
With this addition, the guys that write the "textbooks" you rely upon are "influencers" as they certainly do so with a monetary goal behind their efforts to get published. Thanks for the clarification. That pesky Graeme Wright has been influencing too many here lately. Time for a good old fashioned book burning!Okay, I'll make it simpler: he makes money off his videos and books = influencer. He's also a PH. So what? It's easy enough to find lots of videos of other guides/PHs who are marketing themselves and/or sponsors with YouTube videos, blogs, books, magazine articles, etc. Not all PHs are influencers and not all influencers are PH/guides. Where did you get the idea that the two cannot be the same?
I'll pay attention to the comments from those who have something to say. No time for clowns.Okay, I'll make it simpler: he makes money off his videos and books = influencer. He's also a PH. So what? It's easy enough to find lots of videos of other guides/PHs who are marketing themselves and/or sponsors with YouTube videos, blogs, books, magazine articles, etc. Not all PHs are influencers and not all influencers are PH/guides. Where did you get the idea that the two cannot be the same?