Leopard hunting: bait vs hounds

[mark-hunter]

I am not hunting leopard yet!
This is just for my education, To be considered for some of my future hunts.

You guys who hunted leopard, can you tell me pros and cons of hunting leopard on bait, versus hunting leopard with hounds?

Success rate one vs another?

What is the package price difference one vs another?

Any legal constraints in some countries for these two types of hunt?

Timing? Days to be booked for leopard on bait, vs leopard hunt with hounds? (Most baited leopard packages are 2 weeks, that I have seen, what about hunting with dogs?)

Anything else that you can think of about the subject?

Edit: I made mistake on title, it was meant to be bait vs hounds... I asked moderator to change....

 

[PANTHER TRACKERS]

Please read this opinion knowing it is not intended for sales or promotion!
It is a personal reflection, and I’ve tried to separate it as much as possible from my professional objective.

Leopard over bait has its own allure, especially for hunters who appreciate the art of trapping. Setting a bait, assessing the wind, working the blind placement, and ultimately ambushing a predator at a food source is a discipline in itself. It takes knowledge, patience, and a measure of skill. In most ways, it aligns closely with the principles of trapping – manipulating an animal’s natural instincts into a controlled set-up for a clean shot.

But when I ask myself what truly defines a hunt, my answer has always come back to one word: pursuit.

The Oxford English Dictionary defines “hunt” as: “to chase and kill (wild animals) for food or sport.”
The essence of hunting is in the chase, in the pursuit, in the physical and mental effort of discovering, then staying on spoor until you come face-to-face with your quarry.
Anyone who has tracked buffalo or elephant with skilled trackers holding a line for several kilometers knows exactly the sequence I mean:
spoor visually discovered, followed patiently across natural environment, closing ground step by step until you are standing inside the animal’s striking distance. That is pursuit.

Compare this to luring a leopard (crocodile, lion, hyena, etc) to a bait station and waiting from a blind. The outcome is the same, an animal killed, but the process is fundamentally different. It is closer to trapping than to the classical definition of hunting.

Hounds, on the other hand, advance leopard hunting into the clearest form of pursuit. They hold the track over great distance, forcing the hunter to follow, often through brutal terrain and thick cover, until the cat is brought to bay or treed. Again the hunter steps in, on foot, within striking distance of one of Africa’s most dangerous animals. The risk is real, the engagement is immediate, and the definition of hunting as “pursuit” is fulfilled in its purest sense.

The same logic applies to other examples. Shooting an elephant from a helicopter delivers the same carcass as shooting one at 50 meters on foot. The difference lies not in the result, but in the story – in whether pursuit and engagement were part of the process.

After more than twenty years in this industry, I can say with conviction that pursuing big cats behind hounds is the only method that meets the truest definition of hunting.
It is not a dismissal of other styles! bait hunting, trapping and calling each has its place, and each holds meaning for those who choose it.
But for me, when the word “hunt” is stripped to its essence, hounds are the only method that fully embodies the pursuit of dangerous game.

Just my 2 cents...

 

[mark-hunter]

Which countries legally allow hunting leopard with hounds?

 

[PANTHER TRACKERS]

Botswana, Mozambique and Zimbabwe.
South Africa with a specific permit.

 

[mark-hunter]

In average, how many days are booked for hunt with dogs, vs hunt on bait?

I know most hunts on bait, recommended is about 14 days, 2 weeks?

 

[Hunter-Habib]

I’ve hunted leopard over both bait and hounds. I really enjoy both, but for me, personally… leopard over hounds is far more adrenaline pumping. When pushed long enough, the leopard eventually WILL charge. One word of warning is imperative here- For hunting leopard over hounds, being armed with a double rifle is almost mandatory. Either that or a double barreled or semi automatic shotgun (loaded with Brenneke slugs or copper/nickel plated heavy buckshot) . A bolt action rifle is the worst thing you can be armed with for this type of hunt. If your first shot doesn’t manage to stop the leopard, then it WILL reach you before you have a chance to cycle the bolt and get off a second shot.

In my opinion, the best spots for hunting leopard over hounds… are in the Kalahari in Botswana. In the past, I’ve also hunted leopard over bushmen trackers there in 1976. If my memory serves me correctly, it was the white hunters of Safari South who introduced leopard hunting over hounds in Botswana. The white hunter was either Willie Englebrecht or Douggie Wright.

For the novice, I recommend hunting a leopard over bait first. Equip yourself with an accurate flat trajectory magazine rifle fitted with a low power telescopic sight (not too high magnification)… loaded with high velocity soft points. When the leopard comes to feed, aim for any of the rosettes behind the shoulder. If your shot is placed correctly, things will go pretty straightforward.

P.S: As much as I love hunting leopard over hounds, this type of hunt does carry one inherent disadvantage for a client determined to bag all of his own game. There will always be a chance that the leopard will get shot by someone else in the hunting party other than yourself. If you still want to hunt leopard over hounds, then you have to learn to be okay with this.

 

[Green Chile]

I've done the classic bait hunt for leopard...without success like many others. Some get a cat on their first hunt but you can research the archives here as I have posted topics to get feedback and there are a lot of hunters who have to come back at least once if not multiple times for a leopard. Personally, I loved the strategy and tactics of baiting but we were chasing a ranch cat and they are pressured and educated. I'm hoping to get a cat on my 2nd attempt and did a LOT of research before making a decision to hunt with Panther Trackers and their highly trained dogs in Moz.

 

[dogcat1]

Have done both. Over hounds is a serious rush. We booked 14 days on both. Checking baits is boring, sitting is boring but when the cat shows up or the hounds get the scent, it is game on.
If I do it again, it will be over hounds.

 

[mark-hunter]

Have done both.

Which rifles did you use on each occasion? Double, or bolt action?

 

[Cme1983]

Don’t pinch pennies when you are going on a leopard hunt or you will be paying for the hunt again and again. If you bait hunt, find a wild area with no people or villages nearby, so a truly wild ares (no cattle ranches), and you will see your chances go up tremendously. Botswana seems to provide the best chance for getting a leopard with hounds. The best advice I could give someone looking to hunt a leopard is to save for one or two more years so that you can go to a prime area and kill your cat on the first hunt instead of going multiple times without success.

Hunting leopard over bait does give you the ability to hunt other animals such as buff and plains game along the way. The bait route and leopard hunting in general can be very monotonous.

 

[Pondoro]

Personally, I would have used my 9,3 x 74R double rifle on a hunt for leopard over hounds..as Hunter Habib points out..they are lightning fast.. I dont like baiting..it is not hunting.. Hunting them over hounds can get pretty hairy I imagine..