steve white
AH legend
We all have to test our gear. We sometimes reload to squeeze the best out of a rifle. We look everywhere for the weak link in our arsenal...except in the mirror. What do you look for to alert you that YOU are the problem, not the rifle? And if that cannot be ascertained, do you even have a reasonable assessment of your equipment?
A PH was quoted in another thread saying that he had rather a client bring a 270 Win. than a 338 Magnum. He stated that the 270 required one shot on average vs. two shots for the 338--that is a recoil management problem, is it not? So maybe the line is not so clear cut, for example, where recoil enters as a factor in accuracy assessment? Then there is the question of form vs. function. Many of us were self taught--to our detriment/bad habits. Some rifles, especially ultra light ones may need a different shooting method, or shots are hard to control.
What have you got to offer in terms of adjusting "the nut behind the buttplate"?
A PH was quoted in another thread saying that he had rather a client bring a 270 Win. than a 338 Magnum. He stated that the 270 required one shot on average vs. two shots for the 338--that is a recoil management problem, is it not? So maybe the line is not so clear cut, for example, where recoil enters as a factor in accuracy assessment? Then there is the question of form vs. function. Many of us were self taught--to our detriment/bad habits. Some rifles, especially ultra light ones may need a different shooting method, or shots are hard to control.
What have you got to offer in terms of adjusting "the nut behind the buttplate"?