Heaven Can Wait!

John P.

AH enthusiast
Joined
Feb 4, 2016
Messages
259
Reaction score
486
Location
USA Pacific NW
Media
46
Yes, Heaven can wait!

When we have M98 actions this nice to work with. Pulled both out of the vault today to test on the Wilson Rockwell Hardness Tester. Forgot just how nice they are! No silly bubba drilling and tapping or grinding on the rear bridges.

The one on the right is barreled with the 400 H&H Krieger barrel. Action on the left still has the original 8x57 barrel. May use this one for a future 465 H&H build. The silly bolt handle has to go.

Regardless, both rifles will be iron sights only. This is why I do not want any darn extra holes in the receivers!

Both actions have a very unusual feature that I have not found on M98's in the past. Can anyone guess?

v5aDGVn.jpg
 
They look very nice.
 
Yes, Heaven can wait!

When we have M98 actions this nice to work with. Pulled both out of the vault today to test on the Wilson Rockwell Hardness Tester. Forgot just how nice they are! No silly bubba drilling and tapping or grinding on the rear bridges.

The one on the right is barreled with the 400 H&H Krieger barrel. Action on the left still has the original 8x57 barrel. May use this one for a future 465 H&H build. The silly bolt handle has to go.

Regardless, both rifles will be iron sights only. This is why I do not want any darn extra holes in the receivers!

Both actions have a very unusual feature that I have not found on M98's in the past. Can anyone guess?

View attachment 391469
What's the feature that most don't have?
 
The "42" is a manufacturer code, early Oberndorf. I would love to have those 2 actions at my disposal.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
67,299
Messages
1,493,574
Members
144,987
Latest member
8xxdev2
 

 

 

Latest posts

Latest profile posts

channelkat wrote on NMAmateurHunter's profile.
FYI we need NM members! Please spread the word and join us if you can make it.
1775843806328.png
observe wrote on NZ Jack's profile.
Jerome, do you think my last post in rough camping must maybe shift as an article?
 
Top