Very true, Mac is no where near as weird as I…albeit that holds true for most.Backer Rod for the win! I don’t have Will’s OCD problems however.
I’m 2-5 SD typically 4 shots. For me it’s consistent.
I’ve not noticed the black residue before but maybe just not paying attention. 5-10 minutes in the ultrasonic cleaner and they come out very clean. I’ll keep and eye on that going forward.
I would not use anything but a firm soft filler no type powder with the chance to mix with the gun powderNot if you fill the case to the bottom of the bullet. If you do it correctly, you fill all the empty space on top of the powder column, but don't compress the powder charge.
The closed cell vs open cell is something the backer rod manufacturers also make both for reasons over just how squishy it is. Closed cell is noted as better suited for cold and wet applications, and not over 200 degrees. For any higher heat applications, open cell is recommended.I wonder whether open vs closed does or does not make a difference. I do see many forum members mention open cell, like the Kynoch wads, but curious if anyone has tested or experienced the difference?
Yes I think Michael and Sam noted that often. It’s been 15 years or so since they were doing all that testing.Wow, 10 k psi difference over Dacron is a huge difference so is the velocity.
Yep that’s the graph that helped me switch to foam, I use 3031 and had no velocity loss or regulation change.Wow, 10 k psi difference over Dacron is a huge difference so is the velocity.
I had switched before that just for ease of loading. Was surprised to see their results when they published them.Yep that’s the graph that helped me switch to foam, I use 3031 and had no velocity loss or regulation change.
Easier, faster and 10,000 psi less pressure.
Thanks! This what I was referring to but could not find.The data compiled using various types of Filler by Michael McCorry and Same Rose View attachment 768639used Foam Backer Rod