Ending Trophy Hunting Of Elephants: Is This A Conservation Success?

Discussion in 'Articles' started by Royal27, Jan 31, 2018.

  1. Royal27

    Royal27 AH ENABLER AH Ambassador

    Joined:
    May 27, 2012
    Messages:
    8,211
    Video/Photo:
    81
    Likes Received:
    9,475
    Member of:
    DSC, NRA, SCI
    Hunted:
    USA - TX, CO, GA. Africa - Zimbabwe and South Africa (Limpopo and EC)
    Good read.

    https://sciblogs.co.nz/chthonic-wil...rophy-hunting-elephants-conservation-success/

    shutterstock_123350116.jpg


    Ending Trophy Hunting of Elephants: Is this a Conservation Success?
    By Brendan Moyle • 23/11/2017 • 2

    Following a wave of popular outrage, the US government appears to be backtracking on the decision to allow the import elephant hunting trophies.

    Nonetheless, despite the support of celebrities and Animal Rights groups like the HSUS, it is not obvious this will help conserve elephants. Sadly I don’t host popular talk shows or star in movies. I do research ivory black-markets though. And not by sitting in my office using Google. I do it by going to the places these black-markets operate. It’s not the safest way to do research (albeit in contrast to my colleagues’ perceptions, I don’t get shot at every time I go overseas). And it’s not the easiest. But it gets results. I’m informed enough to provide expert advice to organisations as varied as the World Bank, the Chinese SFA and the UN Office on Drugs and Crime. I don’t have a popular chat show though.

    So let’s try another take on the whole trophy-hunting ban issue.

    1 It’s a misnomer to describe it as a ban on trophy-hunting.
    The US regulations allow for the imports of hunting trophies of endangered animals, if they meet an enhancement condition. That is, the hunting operation leads to net conservation benefits in the hunting area. The EU operates similar regulations. The US decided that in 2014 that Zimbabwe and Zambia did not meet the enhancement test. Trophy imports from other compliant range state continued. For instance, Namibia is a significant user of trophy-hunting and CITES import data, shows the US continuing to import elephant trophies from Namibia in this period.

    Note that in 2015 the EU had already determined that Zambia and Zimbabwe did meet their version of the enhancement regulations. Since 2014, both Zambia and Zimbabwe have been working to become compliant again.

    2 It wasn’t a decision by Trump
    The US FWS were looking for these states to provide more population data, evidence of anti-poaching efforts and evidence that enough money from the trophy-hunts was being used for conservation. This was a process started during the Obama-administration and by 2017, the US FWS was in the same position as the EU. Elephant trophy-hunting was in the affected areas, a net conservation benefit.

    Note that the decision is not made on what the elephant population is, in the entire country. Nor is it made on what the historical elephant population was. It is about the areas that elephant trophy-hunting occurs.

    The cleverest PR move by the Animal Rights groups opposed to trophy-hunting, was linking this decision to Trump. Trump is a deeply unpopular president and by associating it with him, opposition to the FWS decision quickly grew. What this does is completely discount the work done by the affected African governments to meet the US conditions. It ignores the historical context.

    3 Why we shouldn’t worry about Trophy Hunting
    From a conservation perspective, trophy-hunting removes a very small number of elephants from the total population. The biggest losses of elephants are caused by habitat-loss, competition with live-stock, and poaching. Poaching removes 25-30,000 elephants a year. It’s harder to estimate losses from habitat-loss and live-stock competition, but the fact that elephants (like other wildlife) have disappeared much faster in East, Central and West African regions to the South, is significant. Elephants need the same pasture, the same grazing, the same water as cattle. And they need a lot of it. These northern regions have much higher population densities and human growth rates (Graph 1)

    [​IMG]
    Graph 1: Human Population to 2050 via Nature.com
    Most elephants in Africa are now located in the Southern Range states. Zimbabwe, with 83,000 elephants, has the second highest population in the Continent. Kenya in comparison has 23,000. Namibia has now overtaken Kenya in terms of elephants. It’s gone from 16,000 in the 2007 census to 25,000 in the 2016. In 2007 60% of Africa’s elephants were found in Botswana, Zimbabwe and Tanzania. (Heavy poaching in Tanzania has since affected that).

    Human-Animal-Conflict (HAC) has a mortality rate of about 0.5%. That removes 2000 to 2500 elephants a year. HAC is basically what happens when aggressive elephants move into populated areas, damaging property, consuming crops and sometimes killing people.

    Trophy hunting removes very little elephants. With elephants listed as endangered, most range states have set quotas for CITES purposes. Zimbabwe is 500, Zambia is 30. Note that this is an upper limit and is often not reached. Trophy-hunting isn’t a carte blanche operation involving thousands of elephants. It’s the least-consequential form of elephant loss there is.

    So the things that keep me in a cold sweat about elephants and their conservation are poaching, and habitat loss/competition. Poaching is definitely getting a lot of attention, but its hard to be confident that habitat-loss is under control.

    4 What are the risks of trophy hunting?
    I’ve seen suggestions that trophy hunting could be used to smuggle poached ivory. This is ridiculous. The nature of ivory smuggling is that it is dominated by large shipments of raw tusks, hidden in containers, sent to East Asia. Asian criminal organisations aren’t going to be sending them in small shipments under permits cross-checked at either end, to the US, in the hope they can then be shipped to East Asia. Somehow. Because nobody in the US will be smart enough to compare the number of hunting trophies to the tiny quotas permitted. The link to poaching is inventive and unrealistic.

    5 How does trophy hunting help conservation?
    Well, it doesn’t always. It can be mismanaged. But it can help sometimes. I’ve already alluded to the increase in elephant populations in Namibia.

    So how does hunting help?

    The key is where hunting occurs. Many reserves are bordered by buffer areas where wildlife and humans mix. In some regions there are no reserves and the area is managed by the community. The basic model is that hunters do not go into the reserves, but these community areas where wildlife spills over into. It’s not easy getting elephants to stop moving at the edge of a nature reserve.

    In these community areas, elephants suffer mortality for several reasons. They could get poached. They could be prevented from grazing or feeding in some areas (habitat loss). They could starve because the human livestock eats the pasture instead (competition). They could get shot by a trophy hunter. The population could also go up by elephants reproducing and migration. (One of the dilemmas for Zimbabwe is they’re too successful and while their reserves can sustain 40,000 elephants, they’ve overshot to 80,000+).

    Anyway, trophy hunters pay the local community a lot of money (by their aspirations), even after leakage to corrupt officials. So this gives the locals a strong incentive to reduce mortality from the other sources. So if mortality from poaching and competition drops a lot after trophy hunting, elephant populations rise. This more than offsets the loss from trophies. For example, in the early days of the community-based conservation programme CAMPFIRE in Zimbabwe, it was reported farmers were removing cattle from the landscapes to have more elephants. It works the other way as well. If there is no trophy hunting, then mortality form these other source scan surge. In short, it’s complicated.

    A lot of meat also goes to local communities also. About 340,000 kg of meat was returned to communal conservancies in 2016 Namibia alone.

    6 Trophy Hunting is Icky
    Well, I’m a vegetarian and I prefer taking photos to shooting stuff. But the goal is to have more elephants. And that seems to be something trophy hunting is helping with in some places. It’s not about making Westerners feel good, but conserving elephants on the ground.

    7 Why not use Eco-tourism instead?
    Because ecotourists stick to nature reserves. Reserves have high densities of wildlife and few humans, goats and cattle. Tourists want to see wildlife in their natural state. They don’t go to communal conservancies and buffer-areas as a rule. Wild animal populations are lower and there’s too many goats and cattle.

    In the big picture, 30% of Africa’s elephants live in reserves. 70% range over landscapes shared by people. Elephant conservation cannot ignore that 70%. And if elephants are going to survive in that 70%, the decisions made by local communities matter. Because if they don’t want to share those landscapes with elephants, there’s very little we can do to stop them. Elephants will disappear incrementally, steadily and permanently. Having tools that persuade them that elephants are good to have around, and with revenue being an effective tool, then hunting is something to consider.

    Summary
    Sadly in the end, this looks like an animal rights decision masquerading as a conservation, and a charade that a scientific decision was really a political decision by an unpopular President. It is getting hard to be optimistic about elephant conservation. Human population growth is on track to reduce elephant numbers in almost all range states, bar the south. Poaching is still not under control. The very high numbers in the Southern Region are likely due for a correction because of the sheer density. Zimbabwe estimated their reserves could cope with about 40,000 elephants back in the early 1990s. They have 80,000+. We look to have a serious ecological overshoot problem.
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 1, 2018

  2. jacques smith

    jacques smith AH Fanatic

    Joined:
    May 25, 2014
    Messages:
    509
    Likes Received:
    368
    Thanks royal
    Finally someone with intelligence and facts as opposed to someone with a mouth full of pablum and full diapers cheers
     
    Tom Hawk and Royal27 like this.

  3. Royal27

    Royal27 AH ENABLER AH Ambassador

    Joined:
    May 27, 2012
    Messages:
    8,211
    Video/Photo:
    81
    Likes Received:
    9,475
    Member of:
    DSC, NRA, SCI
    Hunted:
    USA - TX, CO, GA. Africa - Zimbabwe and South Africa (Limpopo and EC)
    And did you notice he's a vegetarian? Says even more to me just because of that.
     
    J.Ogilvie, Tom Hawk and edward like this.

  4. rinehart0050

    rinehart0050 GOLD SUPPORTER AH Elite

    Joined:
    May 24, 2015
    Messages:
    1,977
    Video/Photo:
    131
    Likes Received:
    1,574
    Hunted:
    New Zealand, South Africa (NWP, Limpopo, Eastern Cape); USA (NE, AZ, TX)
    Great article. If people made decisions lb facts alone, the right decision is clear. Unfortunate, most let emotion govern thier opinions and cloud thier judgement.
     
    edward and siml like this.

  5. Tom Hawk

    Tom Hawk AH Veteran

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2017
    Messages:
    242
    Likes Received:
    147
    Too many undereducated people. Research before you speak.
     

  6. cbvanb

    cbvanb AH Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2010
    Messages:
    76
    Likes Received:
    84
    Hunted:
    South Africa, Zambia, Zimbabwe
    As someone pointed out in an earlier discussion regarding this issue, the ban only affects trophy imports, not hunting. We can still hunt elephants all we want, and the reality is the ban tends to drive down prices dramatically. So there is some benefit if the ban continues.

    There is always the option of taking castings of your ivory, and you still own the trophies. Some enterprising outfitter needs to find a way to store trophies for hunters in the event the fools in America wake up one day and realize the damage they have done to all African animal populations, as elephants are now impacting many other species.

    I would personally like to be able to import one trophy from Zimbabwe, where I have hunted elephants, and been hunted by elephants off and on over the past 25 years. Circumstances in the past were such that I was unable to bring anything home, and it’s the one species for which I have nothing to show, save a few elephant hair bracelets. It may be that ship has sailed, but that may also put elephant hunting back into the realm of possibility for me.
     

  7. IdaRam

    IdaRam BRONZE SUPPORTER AH Elite

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2014
    Messages:
    1,527
    Video/Photo:
    160
    Likes Received:
    2,278
    Location:
    Idaho
    Member of:
    NRA Life Member, NAHC Life Member, SCI, DSC, Wild Sheep Foundation, NSSF
    Hunted:
    Idaho, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, California, Alberta Canada, South Africa, Zimbabwe
    Not just America, Canada and Europe have their share as well ;) But yes, between the ARA’s and politicians, animals of many species have some serious challenges in their future. Ecosystems must be managed, not just individual animal species.
     
    Tom Hawk likes this.

  8. Tom Hawk

    Tom Hawk AH Veteran

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2017
    Messages:
    242
    Likes Received:
    147
    I’ll give every hippie a sheep. What’s that? You don’t like coyotes? Kill them all?:DOK! A dollar each!
     

  9. J.Ogilvie

    J.Ogilvie New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2016
    Messages:
    11
    Likes Received:
    6
    Location:
    Australia
    This really is a great article! The author deserves some serious praise for being truthful and sticking to the facts.
     
    Royal27 likes this.

  10. 50lawman

    50lawman BRONZE SUPPORTER AH Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2011
    Messages:
    46
    Video/Photo:
    9
    Likes Received:
    32
    Location:
    Honolulu, Hawaii
    Member of:
    SCI/ North American Hunt CLub
    Hunted:
    Namibia
    My world is roiling in confusion right now. I did notice that Royal27 (or was it someone else) declared that he is a vegetarian. He can't be both! A vegetarian (Indian word for bad hunter) and he has still hunted all over the world. I guess I will have to accept that fact. Man there are a lot of interesting, intelligent, compassionate, and humble people on this site. I think I'll stay.
     

  11. Hank2211

    Hank2211 AH ENABLER GOLD SUPPORTER AH Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,289
    Video/Photo:
    67
    Likes Received:
    4,025
    Member of:
    SCI, DU, Pheasants Forever
    Hunted:
    Canada, United States, Zimbabwe, South Africa (Eastern Cape; Northern Cape; North West Province, Natal, Mpumalanga, Limpopo), Namibia, Cameroon, Benin, Ethiopia, Argentina
    Not sure what you mean @IdaRam. Canada follows CITES when it comes to hunting, and doesn’t add any particular view of its own as to what should be allowed or not.

    Elephant are Appendix 2 for most Southern Africa populations, including those in respect of which the US has a problem. So long as you have a CITES quota and an export permit, elephant trophies are allowed to be imported without compliance with any additional local measures. If you hunt an Appendix 1 population, you will need an import permit, but so long as, again, you have an export permit and CITES permit, the import permit will be issued.

    If you meant share of irrational anti-hunters, well, agree with you there.
     
    IdaRam likes this.

  12. IdaRam

    IdaRam BRONZE SUPPORTER AH Elite

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2014
    Messages:
    1,527
    Video/Photo:
    160
    Likes Received:
    2,278
    Location:
    Idaho
    Member of:
    NRA Life Member, NAHC Life Member, SCI, DSC, Wild Sheep Foundation, NSSF
    Hunted:
    Idaho, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, California, Alberta Canada, South Africa, Zimbabwe
    Hi Hank,
    As I re-read my post it is clear that I wasn’t very... well, clear :D
    My comment was intended to say that America doesn’t have a corner on the market when it comes to fools. Plenty of idiots across the globe whose actions are doing no favors to animal populations and are in fact doing just the opposite.
    Although, in re-reading the post by cbvanb, it is unclear if he was referring to americans in general or to America and our lack of willingness to accept CITES at face value.
     

Share This Page

 
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice