CZ 550 9.3x62, barrel mounted recoil lug, and B&C stock fit Qs

John Camp

AH enthusiast
Joined
Jan 12, 2019
Messages
429
Reaction score
359
Location
Newnan GA
Media
21
Hunting reports
USA/Canada
2
Hunted
Mexico, Georgia, California, Missouri, Tennessee, Iowa, Idaho
that is a bummer
 

shootist~

Silver supporter
AH enthusiast
Joined
Jan 9, 2019
Messages
495
Reaction score
561
Location
Albuquerque, NM
Media
11
Member of
NRA Life Member, USPSA Certified Range Officer (inactive), NRA Certified Instructor (inactive)
Hunted
USA, Mexico
I talked to the folks at Bell and Carlson - they indicate the recoil lug is supposed to bottom-out on the aluminum bedding block (per the original CZ design specs).

They state I am welcome to return it, but suggested I bed the recoil lug using just a spot of bedding material. No guarantees that this will cure the accuracy issue, however. And of course once the stock is modified, it cannot be returned.

Has anyone done this (bedded the recoil lug area on a B&C stock)?

Pic of recoil lug area per Bell and Carlson:
image0 B_C Lug Pic.jpg

Pic provided by Bell and Carlson showing recoil lug / stock area.
 

shootist~

Silver supporter
AH enthusiast
Joined
Jan 9, 2019
Messages
495
Reaction score
561
Location
Albuquerque, NM
Media
11
Member of
NRA Life Member, USPSA Certified Range Officer (inactive), NRA Certified Instructor (inactive)
Hunted
USA, Mexico
To update this thread I did what Bell & Carlson suggested and bedded the recoil lug area. (I also added just a little Devcon 10110 at the receiver screw areas since there appeared to be a little extra space there).

I saw some small improvement in group sizes, but No Joy for the most part.

So...
I came back and bedded the rear of the barrel (not letting the epoxy touch the front of the receiver), and also added a barrel/forearm pressure point - just behind the front sling swivel.

Results are now looking very good. First out yesterday, starting with a clean barrel, and things were looking promising on paper at 100M. At 12 rounds it seemed like it was still settling in, so with temps rising and the range getting a little crowded, I called it a day.

Left it dirty and back out early this morning shooting freshly painted steel at 219 (my Zero distance), 225 and 325 Yards. It's now trying to put the first two shots in the same hole :) with 3 shot groups running sub MOA. I did have one unexplained flyer (out of another 12 shots fired), but it was not horrible.

3 at 325 Yds from the bench did 2 3/4" (0.8 MOA) holding 1 mil-dot high. (Optic is a NF 2.5-10x42 with the old style hollow mil-dot reticle. I really like this reticle.)
Range Shots 9.3x62 325 YDs after Bbl Bedded.jpeg
 

BC.Pat

AH enthusiast
Joined
Mar 28, 2017
Messages
477
Reaction score
524
Location
Victoria, British Columbia
Media
10
Hunting reports
USA/Canada
1
Hunted
Botswana , Namibia, Sierra Leone
Just my 2 cents, but in all my fiddling with loads for the 9.3x62 I have not had any luck with the light bullets grouping very well.
But I believe a hunting rifle only needs to be MOA, in field conditions most can not hold that!
Good Luck
Pat
 

Forum statistics

Threads
37,598
Messages
718,327
Members
67,195
Latest member
nnwawaowo
 

 

 

Latest posts

Latest profile posts

Cervus elaphus wrote on Bob Nelson 35Whelen's profile.
Hi Bob, how's things going in Wyong?. Down your way a couple of years back but haven't been in NSW since Ebor for the fishing. just getting over some nasty storms up here in Qld, seeing the sun for the first time in a few days. I'm going to NZ in the spring and hope to clean up a few buns while there and perhaps shake the spiders out of my old .303LE (currently owned by my BIL). Cheers Brian
A couple pictures of the sable i chased for miles in Mozambique, Coutada 9!! We finally caught up to him and I had the trophy of a lifetime. Mokore Safaris, Doug Duckworth PH
sable Coutada 9.JPG
sable 2 - Coutada 9.JPG
Safari Dave wrote on egrmpty507's profile.
Did you purchase your hunt at a US SCI fundraiser?
uplander01 wrote on colorado's profile.
Heard you may have load data for the 500 Jeffery,.....any info would be appreciated. Was thinking 535gr, but already had a response that the 570gr would be a better way to go, not sure why.
Rickmt wrote on Leica Sport Optics's profile.
will Leica Amplus 6-2.5x15x50 fit on a pro success Blaser with low mount?
 
Top