The discussion about a generational shift is true, but I think the discussion about optics quality is equally relevant. Low end scopes like Vortex have improved significantly. High end scopes have little room left to improve. Both scopes stay at the same price point while one improves measurably and the other doesn’t. If the glass is clear and a scope reliably holds zero that will fit what most hunters and shooters are looking for. Spending an extra $1000 for 5 minutes at last light after legal shooting hours ends is a tough sell compared to a $200 scope with a no questions asked warranty. I hate seeing Zeiss go and hope Leupold and Swarovski don’t end up in the same situation, but I think quality improvements of low end scopes have driven a lot of this too.
Lots of truth in your post... especially when applied to younger generations that arent nearly as material as older generations..
there's not a whole lot that a rigby highland stalker topped with a swaro Z8 can do, that cant also be accomplished with a ruger american topped with a vortex crossfire II at about 1/20th of the price...
sure the Z8 buys you a few extra minutes in the early morning and the late afternoon.. and might give you a bit more distance due to clarity... and the rigby is a beautiful work of art that happens to also go bang while the american is about as pedestrian as it gets..
but in the mind of a 25 year old that's just getting into the sport... even if he has all the discretionary income in the world, why would he pay 20x more for what in his mind is essentially the same tool?
combine that with how much better "low end" products have gotten in the last 20 years vs the performance increases of the "high end" products over the same time period.. and it becomes a very difficult sell..
most young people arent going to care if a product was made in the Philippines, China, Japan, the USA, Germany, or Austria.. as long as they can get the performance they desire at a price they can afford..
And love them or hate them, its pretty hard to beat the Vortex warranty, Athalon Warranty, Maven Warranty, etc (pretty much unconditional lifetime warranties).. the best a swaro, zeiss, etc can do is match them and try to sell the idea that you're less likely to use the warranty with their products..
the older I get the more resistant I am to change and trying new things... Ive shot leupold and zeiss most of my life... I don't think I have an optic in the safe other than a few swaros that arent either leupold or zeiss anymore.. so I really hate seeing one of my old standby brands going away..
but if I were 25 again, Im pretty sure I'd be thinking similarly to the Gen Z types.. and likely not be brand loyal at all.. I'd just be shopping for the lowest cost option that meets all of my requirements.. and wouldn't care what brand name is on the side of the scope..