Allure of the Ruger No1

I had purchased a used Leupold VX-I 1-4x20 “Shotgun/ Muzzleloader” scope for my No. 1 with the hope that I could get a clear sight picture but still cannot get a clear picture of the edges of the reticle without moving my head unnaturally forward on the stock.

Which scopes have ya’ll had the best luck with?
 
I’ve had the same issue of needing to “crawl” up the stock a bit on my No 1 to see the full image with no black ring.

Has to do with the available scope mounts keeping the scope just that much too far forward.

There are reportedly some cantilevered rear mounts out there that let the scope come back but I’ve never found them.

I run a Leupold VX6HD 1-6 and just live with it. Not really a big issue once I practiced with the rifle/scope setup.
 
Which scopes have ya’ll had the best luck with?

Based on scopes that other shooters have said worked for them, I get the feeling that I require additional eye relief to get most scopes to work for me. I definitely need a generous amount with my bad eyesight & glasses. Quite often, that has translated into some of the pricier scopes. In the past, I've had a Swarovski z5 2.4-12x50, Swarovski z6 1.7-10x42, a Schmidt & Bender 1.5-8x42 Stratos and a Schmidt & Bender 3-12x42 Klassik mounted on mine which have worked really well...at a cost.

Recently I did a scope reshuffle on all of my rifles & was able to move some older scopes to my Rugers that I like better because of their smaller size. The last scope that worked well for me was the Meopta R2 1-6x24 RD that I have on my 303 British. There was one in the classifieds for sale here recently.

My 275 Rigby RSI has a Redfield Revolution 2-7x33 on it. My 6.5x55 SE has a Leupold 6x42 fixed. My 9.3x74r has a Minox ZA5 1.5-8x32.

Because I had so much trouble getting scopes to work for me on my various falling blocks, I got into the habit of drafting various scope models I was thinking of buying onto a cardboard template. Then I would hold them up against a mounted scope that worked great & I was able to judge how far back the rear ocular would be based on where the template contacted the rings and could make an informed decision about its potential suitability.

AH_Scope_Template.jpg


I have a couple of affordable Hawke Optics scopes on my smaller 17 HMR & 22 pneumatic. Several of their scopes (1-6x24, 1-8x24, 1.5-6x44, etc.) looked promising using the above method. The Tract 1-8x24 scopes looked like they would work as well.
 
Ruger sells offset rings for the #1 that positions the scope farther to the rear so that you don't have to crawl the stock. Certainly worth a look.
 
Based on scopes that other shooters have said worked for them, I get the feeling that I require additional eye relief to get most scopes to work for me. I definitely need a generous amount with my bad eyesight & glasses. Quite often, that has translated into some of the pricier scopes. In the past, I've had a Swarovski z5 2.4-12x50, Swarovski z6 1.7-10x42, a Schmidt & Bender 1.5-8x42 Stratos and a Schmidt & Bender 3-12x42 Klassik mounted on mine which have worked really well...at a cost.

Recently I did a scope reshuffle on all of my rifles & was able to move some older scopes to my Rugers that I like better because of their smaller size. The last scope that worked well for me was the Meopta R2 1-6x24 RD that I have on my 303 British. There was one in the classifieds for sale here recently.

My 275 Rigby RSI has a Redfield Revolution 2-7x33 on it. My 6.5x55 SE has a Leupold 6x42 fixed. My 9.3x74r has a Minox ZA5 1.5-8x32.

Because I had so much trouble getting scopes to work for me on my various falling blocks, I got into the habit of drafting various scope models I was thinking of buying onto a cardboard template. Then I would hold them up against a mounted scope that worked great & I was able to judge how far back the rear ocular would be based on where the template contacted the rings and could make an informed decision about its potential suitability.

View attachment 693848

I have a couple of affordable Hawke Optics scopes on my smaller 17 HMR & 22 pneumatic. Several of their scopes (1-6x24, 1-8x24, 1.5-6x44, etc.) looked promising using the above method. The Tract 1-8x24 scopes looked like they would work as well.
Thats a brilliant idea! Thanks for detailed summary!
 
Would love to hear if anyone has tried the GUNNR Odin 1-10×28 LPVO Rifle Scope or if there’s another sleeper optic we’re overlooking.
 
Apologize for a seemingly incoherent previous comment. Ruger makes offset rings for their dovetail system. I have by at least one on every No 1 and on a couple the optics are much better supported by a pair these rings. Leupold offers the offset rings in 30mm. I do have one that utilizes these Leupold rings. Secondly you can install a replacement quarter rib that offers a pic rail with multiple ring placements. Thirdly you can add a “clamp on” picatinny top rail. EGW? I haven’t gone that route but I do recognize that it’s an interesting alternative. It would get me the opportunity to utilize a 56 mm objective. They’re great rifles. Good luck!
 

Forum statistics

Threads
61,687
Messages
1,352,086
Members
116,640
Latest member
ColinSmith
 

 

 

Latest profile posts

hi, do you know about lions hunters, leopard hunters, and crocodiles hunters of years 1930s-1950s
I'm new to Africa Hunting. I would like to purchase a Heym 450-400 double rifle. I'm left-handed but would prefer a non-canted gun. Is anyone in the community considering parting with theirs?
Limpopo Bushbuck
Elite Hunting Outfitters
Salahuddin wrote on STEAR's profile.
Thank you.
 
Top