Allure of the Ruger No1

I had purchased a used Leupold VX-I 1-4x20 “Shotgun/ Muzzleloader” scope for my No. 1 with the hope that I could get a clear sight picture but still cannot get a clear picture of the edges of the reticle without moving my head unnaturally forward on the stock.

Which scopes have ya’ll had the best luck with?
 
I’ve had the same issue of needing to “crawl” up the stock a bit on my No 1 to see the full image with no black ring.

Has to do with the available scope mounts keeping the scope just that much too far forward.

There are reportedly some cantilevered rear mounts out there that let the scope come back but I’ve never found them.

I run a Leupold VX6HD 1-6 and just live with it. Not really a big issue once I practiced with the rifle/scope setup.
 
Which scopes have ya’ll had the best luck with?

Based on scopes that other shooters have said worked for them, I get the feeling that I require additional eye relief to get most scopes to work for me. I definitely need a generous amount with my bad eyesight & glasses. Quite often, that has translated into some of the pricier scopes. In the past, I've had a Swarovski z5 2.4-12x50, Swarovski z6 1.7-10x42, a Schmidt & Bender 1.5-8x42 Stratos and a Schmidt & Bender 3-12x42 Klassik mounted on mine which have worked really well...at a cost.

Recently I did a scope reshuffle on all of my rifles & was able to move some older scopes to my Rugers that I like better because of their smaller size. The last scope that worked well for me was the Meopta R2 1-6x24 RD that I have on my 303 British. There was one in the classifieds for sale here recently.

My 275 Rigby RSI has a Redfield Revolution 2-7x33 on it. My 6.5x55 SE has a Leupold 6x42 fixed. My 9.3x74r has a Minox ZA5 1.5-8x32.

Because I had so much trouble getting scopes to work for me on my various falling blocks, I got into the habit of drafting various scope models I was thinking of buying onto a cardboard template. Then I would hold them up against a mounted scope that worked great & I was able to judge how far back the rear ocular would be based on where the template contacted the rings and could make an informed decision about its potential suitability.

AH_Scope_Template.jpg


I have a couple of affordable Hawke Optics scopes on my smaller 17 HMR & 22 pneumatic. Several of their scopes (1-6x24, 1-8x24, 1.5-6x44, etc.) looked promising using the above method. The Tract 1-8x24 scopes looked like they would work as well.
 
Based on scopes that other shooters have said worked for them, I get the feeling that I require additional eye relief to get most scopes to work for me. I definitely need a generous amount with my bad eyesight & glasses. Quite often, that has translated into some of the pricier scopes. In the past, I've had a Swarovski z5 2.4-12x50, Swarovski z6 1.7-10x42, a Schmidt & Bender 1.5-8x42 Stratos and a Schmidt & Bender 3-12x42 Klassik mounted on mine which have worked really well...at a cost.

Recently I did a scope reshuffle on all of my rifles & was able to move some older scopes to my Rugers that I like better because of their smaller size. The last scope that worked well for me was the Meopta R2 1-6x24 RD that I have on my 303 British. There was one in the classifieds for sale here recently.

My 275 Rigby RSI has a Redfield Revolution 2-7x33 on it. My 6.5x55 SE has a Leupold 6x42 fixed. My 9.3x74r has a Minox ZA5 1.5-8x32.

Because I had so much trouble getting scopes to work for me on my various falling blocks, I got into the habit of drafting various scope models I was thinking of buying onto a cardboard template. Then I would hold them up against a mounted scope that worked great & I was able to judge how far back the rear ocular would be based on where the template contacted the rings and could make an informed decision about its potential suitability.

View attachment 693848

I have a couple of affordable Hawke Optics scopes on my smaller 17 HMR & 22 pneumatic. Several of their scopes (1-6x24, 1-8x24, 1.5-6x44, etc.) looked promising using the above method. The Tract 1-8x24 scopes looked like they would work as well.
Thats a brilliant idea! Thanks for detailed summary!
 
Would love to hear if anyone has tried the GUNNR Odin 1-10×28 LPVO Rifle Scope or if there’s another sleeper optic we’re overlooking.
 
Apologize for a seemingly incoherent previous comment. Ruger makes offset rings for their dovetail system. I have by at least one on every No 1 and on a couple the optics are much better supported by a pair these rings. Leupold offers the offset rings in 30mm. I do have one that utilizes these Leupold rings. Secondly you can install a replacement quarter rib that offers a pic rail with multiple ring placements. Thirdly you can add a “clamp on” picatinny top rail. EGW? I haven’t gone that route but I do recognize that it’s an interesting alternative. It would get me the opportunity to utilize a 56 mm objective. They’re great rifles. Good luck!
 
What is really needed is some one to make an aftermarket quarter rib that extends over the receiver ring so the rear scope ring is further back-even over receiver ring.

All the standard scopes I have used these past 40 plus years have marginal eye relief and only at lower powers.

I have only recently become aware of the EA Brown rib mount and have not had an opportunity to check it first hand. Review from 06/22/25 does not look promising, failed to solve the eye relief problem.
 
You still have to use offset rings no matter the rail. Huge issue anymore is the short coupled optics on the market. These leave the objective making contact on the rib before the optic is far enough back to solve the eye relief issue
 
What is really needed is some one to make an aftermarket quarter rib that extends over the receiver ring so the rear scope ring is further back-even over receiver ring.

All the standard scopes I have used these past 40 plus years have marginal eye relief and only at lower powers.

I have only recently become aware of the EA Brown rib mount and have not had an opportunity to check it first hand. Review from 06/22/25 does not look promising, failed to solve the eye relief problem.
I have one of these, but haven't mounted it, looks like it will need tall rings anyways.
 
I think I have two of them left, a .475 Linebaugh and a .416 Rigby. The Rigby isn't a pleasant shooter with top end loads but it's manageable and the Linebaugh is a joy. They're both very pretty guns.
 
They are also wonderful in a deer blind, particularly the #1A and the international.
Nice and easy to stick out the window! Short package

Can’t tell you how many times I’ve banged a steel blind with some long 26 inch bolt gun trying to get it out the window haha.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
62,910
Messages
1,381,901
Members
121,623
Latest member
Fpcovolin
 

 

 

Latest profile posts

Available dates for the 2026 seasons

March is open
April is open
1-14 May is open
24-31 May is open
11-19 June is open
24-30 June is open
1-19 July is open
August-October is open!

book early! get your spot I will update them as we go!
We have just booked for the International Sportmans's expo in Denver Colorado 8-11 January 2026!

please shoot me massage if anyone wants to meet up there or anywhere else in the USA we have started planning our 2026 marketing Trip to the USA!
mfharoldson wrote on SkullKeeper's profile.
Hello! I saw your post from last year about a missing crate from your hunt in Moz. I am curious how that all turned out? We (my fiancé and I) also hunted in Moz in 2024 and the trophies are being shipped with Hunters Services Limitada. We have some concerns on whether we will get the trophies home or not. May I ask who you hunted with?
 
Top