404 Jeffery Build on a standard action ??

The only difference between a standard and magnum Mauser '98 is the length.
Receiver ring diameter is the same.
Bolt diameter/bolt face is the same.
The locking ring (or recess as I hear it called) is reduced to accommodate longer or larger diameter cartridges.
Keep in mind that this recess is just ahead of the loading ramp so as the ramp is altered there is potential to reduce the recess and thus the area where the bolt lug contacts the action.
I've never smoked an action to see exactly where the lug engages the action but I'd wager that few have good contact over the entire surface where they fit together.
The 425WR, 11.2X72, 404 and the 500 Schuler/Jeffery were all deliberately designed to fit a standard action.
I don't know why the rebated rim was chosen other than it obviates the need to open the bolt face which I suppose could be seen as a benefit if one needed a replacement bolt or extractor out in the field, at least for the 425 and 11.2 - the 500 rim is rebated in relation to the base but not as markedly as the other two.

Properly built 500s run as smoothly as any other chambering - the rebated rim is not a design flaw.
As I understand it, the rebated rim allowed for use of stripper clips which culling game control rangers liked. I can't imagine using that much 500 Jeffery ammo that fast for culling dangerous game. Ouch! Must have been exciting times! Those rangers were tough characters! Built for rugby.
 
Jeffery built the 404 on standard actions because that’s what they could get. As soon as the magnum action became available they stitched to that. That happened early on. The 404 is 375 length and anyone can see the advantage of the magnum action over the standard action for cartridges of this length.
404 Jeffery OAL is 3.53". 375 H&H is 3.60" long. Longer 375 requires trimming the ejection port of locking ring for ejection of loaded cartridges as well as trimming the bottom of ring for loading ramp. I did not need to remove any of the ring to accommodate ejection (but I don't imagine I could get away with seating bullets any higher than 3.53"). Looking into the action just now with scope detached, I see that the forward end of receiver magazine port is not cut into the bottom of locking ring any deeper than the unaltered top of the locking ring (ejection port). Of course a bevel must be added to the trimmed bottom ring to restore the loading ramp. I don't see that removing so little metal to restore the ramp would significantly weaken a standard action locking ring. Obviously there was plenty of extra metal in that area of the ring for 8mm box. Making standard 98 into 375 or 416 is doable but does require removing more metal from the locking ring both top and bottom. 404 is a stronger build on standard action.
 
That’s a good looking rifle you do custom work??
Only on my own stuff, the law down here doesn’t allow me to work on other peoples firearms without paying the government for a piece of plastic that says I can, in fact they don’t like me doing my own stuff so it’s all gone over by my gunsmith friend who ok's it
Gumpy
 
404 Jeffery OAL is 3.53". 375 H&H is 3.60" long. Longer 375 requires trimming the ejection port of locking ring for ejection of loaded cartridges as well as trimming the bottom of ring for loading ramp. I did not need to remove any of the ring to accommodate ejection (but I don't imagine I could get away with seating bullets any higher than 3.53"). Looking into the action just now with scope detached, I see that the forward end of receiver magazine port is not cut into the bottom of locking ring any deeper than the unaltered top of the locking ring (ejection port). Of course a bevel must be added to the trimmed bottom ring to restore the loading ramp. I don't see that removing so little metal to restore the ramp would significantly weaken a standard action locking ring. Obviously there was plenty of extra metal in that area of the ring for 8mm box. Making standard 98 into 375 or 416 is doable but does require removing more metal from the locking ring both top and bottom. 404 is a stronger build on standard action.
404 Jeffery OAL is 3.53". 375 H&H is 3.60" long. Longer 375 requires trimming the ejection port of locking ring for ejection of loaded cartridges as well as trimming the bottom of ring for loading ramp. I did not need to remove any of the ring to accommodate ejection (but I don't imagine I could get away with seating bullets any higher than 3.53"). Looking into the action just now with scope detached, I see that the forward end of receiver magazine port is not cut into the bottom of locking ring any deeper than the unaltered top of the locking ring (ejection port). Of course a bevel must be added to the trimmed bottom ring to restore the loading ramp. I don't see that removing so little metal to restore the ramp would significantly weaken a standard action locking ring. Obviously there was plenty of extra metal in that area of the ring for 8mm box. Making standard 98 into 375 or 416 is doable but does require removing more metal from the locking ring both top and bottom. 404 is a stronger build on standard action.
You are correct about overall length but the cases are both 2.850 if I remember correctly.
 
You are correct about overall length but the cases are both 2.850 if I remember correctly.
404 case is actually slightly longer: 2.875". But it's the OAL that determines box length and how much metal has to be carved from the rings. I have actually never checked the clearance for ejecting loaded shells from my 404. It ejects them fine but I wonder just how close the bullet tip is to locking ring. Hmmm. I will go have a look.

I could only eyeball it as no way to squeeze my caliper in there but appears to be about 0.07" clearance between bullet tip and locking ring at the point when ejector engages. Cartridge was exactly 3.53" OAL. It's tight but I've cycled hundreds of dummy rounds through the gun since finishing the project and none have failed to eject. Jeffery designed the 404 cartridge to fit perfectly in a standard action 98 Mauser. Loaded shells don't seem to kick out with much vigor but empty cases fly off to the next zip code. But they are heavy cartridges. Kinda handy having the shells almost drop at my feet when unloading the rifle.
 
404 case is actually slightly longer: 2.875". But it's the OAL that determines box length and how much metal has to be carved from the rings. I have actually never checked the clearance for ejecting loaded shells from my 404. It ejects them fine but I wonder just how close the bullet tip is to locking ring. Hmmm. I will go have a look.

I could only eyeball it as no way to squeeze my caliper in there but appears to be about 0.07" clearance between bullet tip and locking ring at the point when ejector engages. Cartridge was exactly 3.53" OAL. It's tight but I've cycled hundreds of dummy rounds through the gun since finishing the project and none have failed to eject. Jeffery designed the 404 cartridge to fit perfectly in a standard action 98 Mauser. Loaded shells don't seem to kick out with much vigor but empty cases fly off to the next zip code. But they are heavy cartridges. Kinda handy having the shells almost drop at my feet when unloading the rifle.
That would make loading the super heavy weights harder. I guess you don’t need to.
 
That would make loading the super heavy weights harder. I guess you don’t need to.
I think a few companies make 450 gr 404 bullets but I'm not sure I would even use them to hunt elephants ... if I ever hunted elephants ... and I don't see that happening. 400 gr mono is as heavy as I will need and that's what I gauged at 0.07" clearance.
 
I built my 404J on a magnum Mauser action, but I think a Winchester Model 70 with the 'long' action for the 375 H&H would work just fine... my 375 rounds (which I use in my 375 "Safari Classic') are just a tiny bit longer than my 404J hunting rounds.
 
I think a few companies make 450 gr 404 bullets but I'm not sure I would even use them to hunt elephants ... if I ever hunted elephants ... and I don't see that happening. 400 gr mono is as heavy as I will need and that's what I gauged at 0.07" clearance.

You and Gumpy have inspired me to do this build. I have just sourced a Mauser 98 Sporter A action and will be building it from the ground up. May I ask you some questions as I go along to check my thinking and help me with the steps? The plan is to get the Swift magnum bottom metal as you did to help with the feeding geometry rather than relieving a standard magazine well in the stock like the originals. I can re-barrel and headspace using a Lothar-Walther on my own based on my previous building experience but will need to send the bolt out to be opened up as I don't have a lathe. Then I'll start the voodoo of the rail and feed ramp work which scares me to death. I would really value talking with someone who has done it before successfully specifically on the correct order of doing things. Anyways, this build is a dream for the future, and I have a plains game build in the works first, but either way, I would love to make contact.
 
My 404 is on a Model 70 375HH action. I runs smooth on every thing I have fed it including CEB meplat solids
IMG_6557.jpeg
 
Great choice of barrel, my 9.3X64Br has a Lothar-Walther barrel and shoots sub-moa.
I’ve never had one on my previous builds but they seem to be one of the only that make a short chamber in 404 ready made for Mauser threads, without being a custom job. They have a great reputation.
 
they seem to be one of the only that make a short chamber in 404 ready made for Mauser threads,
If you don't have a lathe, how are you going to cut the threads? If it is a short chambered and threaded barrel then I assume you have a chambering reamer to hand finish the headspacing?
but will need to send the bolt out to be opened up as I don't have a lathe.
Easier to do in a mill than a lathe as the bolt handle makes it very difficult to hold in a lathe 4 jaw, and the bolt face of a controlled feed is actually a slot.
 
You and Gumpy have inspired me to do this build. I have just sourced a Mauser 98 Sporter A action and will be building it from the ground up. May I ask you some questions as I go along to check my thinking and help me with the steps? The plan is to get the Swift magnum bottom metal as you did to help with the feeding geometry rather than relieving a standard magazine well in the stock like the originals. I can re-barrel and headspace using a Lothar-Walther on my own based on my previous building experience but will need to send the bolt out to be opened up as I don't have a lathe. Then I'll start the voodoo of the rail and feed ramp work which scares me to death. I would really value talking with someone who has done it before successfully specifically on the correct order of doing things. Anyways, this build is a dream for the future, and I have a plains game build in the works first, but either way, I would love to make contact.
Duane Wiebe's booklet for building magnums on standard 98 Mauser was very useful for my machinist to set up for opening the bolt face.

Before you start working on the rails, load up three dummy 404 rounds at standard OAL. Start with all three loaded in the box. That will leave top cartridge under the right rail. Get that rail modified so the cartridge jumps to bolt face at just the right spot. For my rifle that spot is about 1.56" ahead of back of box. ⁰Then with just two cartridges in the box, go to work on the left rail. When that rail is cycling, you will next go to work on the follower to make the last cartridge load. Don't touch the right rail! It's done. I ordered a magnum rail from NECG. 416 Rem bottom metal and it worked well without modification. Opening the extractor is tricky. A bit at a time. If you screw it up, no big deal. Extractors for 98 Mauser are easily found on line.
 
If you don't have a lathe, how are you going to cut the threads? If it is a short chambered and threaded barrel then I assume you have a chambering reamer to hand finish the headspacing?

Easier to do in a mill than a lathe as the bolt handle makes it very difficult to hold in a lathe 4 jaw, and the bolt face of a controlled feed is actually a slot.
Lothar-Walther pre-cuts them for the standard 98 action threads. I can index and torque the barrel using my barrel vise/wrench and do the finish reaming with gauges for head spacing. Otherwise if cut from a barrel blank, I would have to send it out for the threads yes. Interesting thought with the mill. That makes sense to me. Either way for the bolt face, it’s beyond my capability to do a cut like that.
 
Duane Wiebe's booklet for building magnums on standard 98 Mauser was very useful for my machinist to set up for opening the bolt face.

Before you start working on the rails, load up three dummy 404 rounds at standard OAL. Start with all three loaded in the box. That will leave top cartridge under the right rail. Get that rail modified so the cartridge jumps to bolt face at just the right spot. For my rifle that spot is about 1.56" ahead of back of box. ⁰Then with just two cartridges in the box, go to work on the left rail. When that rail is cycling, you will next go to work on the follower to make the last cartridge load. Don't touch the right rail! It's done. I ordered a magnum rail from NECG. 416 Rem bottom metal and it worked well without modification. Opening the extractor is tricky. A bit at a time. If you screw it up, no big deal. Extractors for 98 Mauser are easily found on line.
This information gold. Thank you. I’m sure I’ll have more questions when I get to it and I’ll see to getting the booklet. I understand what you mean by the rail work as that makes sense with the stacking order and the rail engagement depending on the stack but I am little confused by what you mean with ordering a magnum rail. Yes I’ll get the same 416 REM bottom metal as you did. I also read your report on the new Ontario shooters assoc. where you went into wonderful detail.
 
This information gold. Thank you. I’m sure I’ll have more questions when I get to it and I’ll see to getting the booklet. I understand what you mean by the rail work as that makes sense with the stacking order and the rail engagement depending on the stack but I am little confused by what you mean with ordering a magnum rail. Yes I’ll get the same 416 REM bottom metal as you did. I also read your report on the new Ontario shooters assoc. where you went into wonderful detail.
The 416 Rem box will be longer than your standard length action's follower. I know guys have made the shorter standard action follower work but having a follower full length is more asthetic and keeps stuff from falling down inside the box over the opening above end of follower. The military follower spring in my action didn't mate up well to the magnum follower and I had to modify it (follower) slightly. I can walk you through it if you decide to go that route. All you need is a vice and patience. I expect the longer magnum follower would require less modification to handle much thicker 404 cartridges. I don't know for sure because I didn't try modifying the standard length follower.

Ask away. Remember, I've only built the one gun. I don't know everything ... yet ... but I'm working on it. :D There's lots of guys on here who are more experienced.
 
This information gold. Thank you. I’m sure I’ll have more questions when I get to it and I’ll see to getting the booklet. I understand what you mean by the rail work as that makes sense with the stacking order and the rail engagement depending on the stack but I am little confused by what you mean with ordering a magnum rail. Yes I’ll get the same 416 REM bottom metal as you did. I also read your report on the new Ontario shooters assoc. where you went into wonderful detail.
Wait ... are you a club member? Maybe we're neighbors? That would be weird. Guess we could grab a coffee at Tim's some time?
 
It would be really cool if he was your neighbor. Really. Then you could tell him all about the .404j you built yourself. He needs to know.

We all do.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
66,556
Messages
1,472,382
Members
141,184
Latest member
ManuelaBau
 

 

 

Latest posts

Latest profile posts

Shotgun Coach wrote on Tdruck's profile.
In the RSA
Turner024 wrote on JG26Irish_2's profile.
Would you be willing to talk sometime about your experience with RDB? More so what you would recommened taking. I will be going in May.
Tdruck wrote on Shotgun Coach's profile.
Good morning,
Did you hunt w Leeuwkop at their ranch or in Zimbabwe? The ranch looks awesome, but I'll be in Zimbabwe for buffalo and whatever else we dig up.
What did you hunt for?
Vaccines?
What rifle did you use?
I feel like I need a good cotton safari shirt and an ammo belt to make the hunt feel right!
How often did you shoot prior to going?
Did you use sticks for shooting practice?



Tedd
 
Top