Says you..
But not proof research, bartlien, krieger, hart, lilja, shilen, benchmark, brux, lothar walther, douglass or a host of other premium barrel makers that are used in some of the finest custom builds on the planet..
The list of long range champions that compete with various 300 mags using a 1:8 or 1:9 twist is significantly longer than the list of champions that compete with 1:10.. I'd say there is a reason for that, that likely goes beyond gross manipulation of what is a fairly tiny market..
Wannabes are everywhere.. every range has a half dozen tacticool dudes with tricked out AR15s they cant keep running and a half dozen elmer fudds calling themselves hunters trying trick shots with their daddys 30-06... its not limited to the LR crowd.. if anything I have found it less prevalent in the LR crowd because the price to play in those circles is very high..
and who is manipulating by the way? all of the premium manufacturers are in some sort of conspiracy to convince buyers to go with a faster twist rate, which doesnt make them look different.. it actually makes them look the same since theyre all doing it.. what major manufacturer are you aware of that started with a 1:10 300 PRC is still producing it? if there is one, I'll bet my next paycheck there are 5 others that have moved away from 1:10...
how exactly do they benefit from your supposed manipulation? you think brux sells more 1:9 twist 300 PRC barrels because that sounds sexier to a guy building out a custom LR gun than a 1:10 twist? All they care about is selling more barrels.. which requires the barrel to perform..
you think the cartridge designer is forcing the barrel makers to go with faster twist rates? how would Hornady benefit from that? All they care about is selling more ammo.. which would require the caretridge to perform..