I agree 100%. My 6.5x55 Swede is a laser and my 9.3x62 is MOA at 50yrds with irons. Both less than $600.these husky's are the poor mans rigby stalker all day long ,,trim/slim stocked just like we like and cheap as hell ,this one is in 9.3x57 and minty
Man, those are well cared for!doesn't get much stealthier than these guys ,, 2-6.5x53r and a 6.5x57
they were in great shape and original ,the army /navy with the horn tip is a real nice original rifle all the bores including the husky I posted are exc. I dont shoot much so once I get them they sit for a bit ,,that mauser Danzig at the beginning off this thread was also mine I sold thru Matt at MNR I buy only nice original riflesMan, those are well cared for!
What did you use to clean out the checkering?
they were in great shape and original ,the army /navy with the horn tip is a real nice original rifle all the bores including the husky I posted are exc. I dont shoot much so once I get them they sit for a bit ,,that mauser Danzig at the beginning off this thread was also mine I sold thru Matt at MNR I buy only nice original rifles
Completely agreethese husky's are the poor mans rigby stalker all day long ,,trim/slim stocked just like we like and cheap as hell ,this one is in 9.3x57 and minty
What an absolute stunning piece, thank you for sharing.Well proportioned and elegant stalking rifles are just a beauty to use.
This one is mine in 7x64:
View attachment 793889
It is a Dumoulin Centurion, which originally had an older straight 20mm tube on claw mounts. I had a new set of claws made, with this over the front bell mount on a Swarovski Z6i with a 42mm objective, in order to be as low as possible. It is a joy to carry, although not exactly lightweight at 3.95kg, (unloaded, no sling, no scope)
One of my dreams!!!!!!View attachment 793888
Fn De Luxe Mauser built in the early 1950’s still ticks the box as a classic stalking rifle. Fn Mauser 98 Commercial Action, French Walnut, hand checkered stock and chrome vanadium steel barrel all combine to make a beautiful, accurate rifle that is as relevant today as it was 70 years ago.
This one is a 7x57!
yes I was ,thats a nice rifle the Peep sight alone is probably worth 200$ ,I had many of these cigarette mausers always thought they were the best deals on the market before you get to original oberndorfs ,, Matt has a few more mausers right now not a trim small type like yours ,btw I never shot itYou were the previous owner of my Danzig Mauser I bought from Matt. I was very happy to find it. It’s very accurate with the peep sight
Beautiful, and this is the only rifle still on my To Get list. I have one in 257 Roberts and one in 270 Winchester, but would like to find an all original in 7x57.View attachment 793888
Fn De Luxe Mauser built in the early 1950’s still ticks the box as a classic stalking rifle. Fn Mauser 98 Commercial Action, French Walnut, hand checkered stock and chrome vanadium steel barrel all combine to make a beautiful, accurate rifle that is as relevant today as it was 70 years ago.
This one is a 7x57!
I don't know about what hassle it would cost you, but they are a lot of rifle for the price.If I were able to order from them without too much hassles I would done so .
26 inch 7x57 barrel
![]()
Musgrave Rifles | Quality & Reliability | South Africa
Musgrave is a proudly South African company that manufactures quality and reliable rifles for tactical and hunting applications.www.musgraverifles.co.za
Correct. Different size/shaped people require different size/shaped stocks ... to a degree. I can make myself fit just about any gun shooting trap high gun (target pulled when shotgun is mounted) or a rifle on the bench. But shooting moving targets requires a gun that fits the shooter the instant it's mounted. I submit it is possible to make the same rifle acquire instantly with either scope or irons by various modifications to stock AND iron sights AND scope/rings/bases. A stock with "classic" straight comb may line up with iron sights instantly but it will be very hard to drop scope enough to acquire instantly without at least seriously changing the bolt handle. If a person's face is huge enough to find the crosshairs, he'll probably be grinding his face into the stock to see optional irons. The "universal" setup requires being able to adjust everything. I will start with a stock that has a slightly elevated comb (e.g. modified Monte Carlo). Then raise the iron sights, front and rear, till I can bore sight the rifle with cheek resting comfortably on the gun. Then start working on scope height. Hopefully I can find rings and base(s) of right height to give me what I need for instant acquisition of crosshairs and full field of view with my cheek still just resting comfortably on the comb. The irons still should be in the ballpark. If I can't get the scope low enough and still cycle the bolt, I may have to return to step one and raise the irons. Or modify the bolt handle till it clears the scope. I would prefer the latter. Again, that's making the selected gun sight choice fit me every time no matter which sighting option I choose.@VertigoBE That 7x64 is just stunning and very well done.
@Ontario Hunter First I commend you on doing your own stock work to get it to where you can see the irons and scope reticle. Second I think that mentioning stock fit is very specific to the individual.
IE
Body dimensions. Short arms, long arms, short neck, long neck, wide shoulder or chest, narrow shoulder or chest, Width between eyes, length of face, full face , angular face. Man or Woman.
All of those have an effect. Luckly a fair number of people either the irons or a scope work for them but very few both will work for.
Rifle itself
Length of pull, pitch, cast, drop at comb and heal of the stock, what is the size of the objective on the scope, what is the eye piece diameter, length of the tube before and after the turrets.