Schüler Jumbo
AH fanatic
And what is your opinion as to why the .450 Rigby was not as popular as the .458 Lott or .505 Gibbs?
Just my opinion and no data to back it up, but I believe the. 458 Lott and the 505 Gibbs were more established and had a great track record in the field. Factory ammunition was more readily available for both at the time, although the Gibbs has become a handloading caliber now. The Lott obliviously has many factory options.And what is your opinion as to why the .450 Rigby was not as popular as the .458 Lott or .505 Gibbs?
Great question and I hope someone has an informed answer.Question: The Weatherby Company has been 100% completely loyal to their line of Weatherby Cartridges. Weatherby stands by their cartridges offering the highest quality Weatherby factory ammunition and the highest quality Weatherby component brass for handloaders. The Weatherby line of cartridges go back to the 1940’s!. Why doesn’t Rigby, a world renown prestigious company, offer Rigby factory ammunition and Rigby component brass for handloaders for the Rigby line of cartridges?
Correct, and I considered one while looking for a Dakota 76 in .450. Parkwest offers their SD 76 in both .450 Dakota and .450 Rigby.CZ did offer a 450 Rigby.
The 460 Weatherby is definitely safe in my opinion and I don't see the Dakota or the Rigby going away any time soon, but they may need their Harry Selby moment down the road to make them really take off.Correct, and I considered one while looking for a Dakota 76 in .450. Parkwest offers their SD 76 in both .450 Dakota and .450 Rigby.
There are examples of fans changing the market. The excellent series Firefly was kept alive by its fans, and resulted later in a full-length big budget feature film Serenity.
The 500gr/2300fps .458 Lott is certainly adequate caliber and energy, but I don't care for its mediocre neck tension, flirting with compression, and belted case. Not dissing what is a popular and available choice above the .458 Win Mag, but it's just not for me.
While there's nothing hugely lacking in a 400gr/2400fps .416 Rigby, I continue to believe in the market for a beltless case providing a noncompressed 500gr/2400-2500fps (especially for PHs wanting a charge-stopping bolt rifle). Such ballistics are not easily seen from a standard-length action, hence the .458 necked up .416 Rigby. Two excellent choices exist today, both proven in Africa, and often favored over the .460 Wby.
I watched for year the 10mm barely hanging on, and today it's a good seller. This ain't over yet.
"they may need their Harry Selby moment down the road to make them really take off"...exactly.The 460 Weatherby is definitely safe in my opinion and I don't see the Dakota or the Rigby going away any time soon, but they may need their Harry Selby moment down the road to make them really take off.
As for my 458 Lott, I'm a if it ain't broke don't fix it kinda guy. It's always done a great job on buffalo and in my CZ it feeds smoothly and shoots awesome, and I love the 5 + 1 capacity. Nothing wrong with the bigger cartridges, but I haven't found a need so far.
It’s been long over. Not even Rigby will step up with factory ammunition or handloading component brass. The .458” caliber market belongs to the .458 Winchester, .458 Lott, and .460 Weatherby. The 10mm Auto is a bad analogy. The 10mm was always supported by quality factory ammunition, quality handloading component brass, and very affordable quality firearms. The 10mm also has the unique advantage of being the most powerful cartridge chambered in a standard size semi-auto and also offered in world-class clip gun revolvers and single actions and carbines. The .450 Rigby has none of those attributes. The .450 Dakota even less so. koning se XI watched for year the 10mm barely hanging on, and today it's a good seller. This ain't over yet.

No flinch here, and I've shot 40+ rounds from the bench with my 450 Rigby, and shot my Croc laying down in the prone with it. Recoil in a heavy rifle takes time to get used to, but isn't anything like what people led me to believe before I bought my big bores.To answer the original question about the 450 Rigby vs 460 Wby - not much difference. You will still need your teeth straightened and a shoulder replacement by the time you get good enough not to flinch.
Stay with the mere mortals amoung us and usa trusted .375 HH or at most a .416 Rigby...
Leave the big boys for the big boys.....
I haven't personally heard of a PH carrying a 450 Dakota recently, but I have seen in person on hunts in Zim and RSA 458 Win and 458 Lott used extensively as well as have seen 460's used by PH's and read accounts here and other SM of the same.Correct, and I considered one while looking for a Dakota 76 in .450. Parkwest offers their SD 76 in both .450 Dakota and .450 Rigby.
There are examples of fans changing the market. The excellent series Firefly was kept alive by its fans, and resulted later in a full-length big budget feature film Serenity.
The 500gr/2300fps .458 Lott is certainly adequate caliber and energy, but I don't care for its mediocre neck tension, flirting with compression, and belted case. Not dissing what is a popular and available choice above the .458 Win Mag, but it's just not for me.
While there's nothing hugely lacking in a 400gr/2400fps .416 Rigby, I continue to believe in the market for a beltless case providing a noncompressed 500gr/2400-2500fps (especially for PHs wanting a charge-stopping bolt rifle). Such ballistics are not easily seen from a standard-length action, hence the .458 necked up .416 Rigby. Two excellent choices exist today, both proven in Africa, and often favored over the .460 Wby.
I watched for year the 10mm barely hanging on, and today it's a good seller. This ain't over yet.
Perhaps, but that's not at all the fault of the cartridge itself. Many superior products have fallen by the wayside. When I was shopping for that very nice treat to myself, an heirloom quality DG rifle, I wanted its caliber to have zero excuses in case design...and that's what I got. I don't mind remaining .450 Dakota's champion.I do tend to agree that is is all but one foot in the grave with the the market securely in the hands of 458 Win/Lott, 450 Rigby, and 460 Wby.
Had two CRF extactors lost claws on a 460 Brno 602 and 10.75 Mauser, a month apart. Both rifles immediately turned into expensive clubs.The .460 Weatherby can be put in a CRF action no problem whatsoever. Notwithstanding plenty of push feed actions see the hunting fields around the world. The .460 Weatherby has been in action since the 1950’s. The .450 Dakota didn’t come along until the late 1990’s…….The .460 has true case capacity to push any weight or length bullet, factory ammo readily available, properly headstamped top quality brass available, top quality handloading dies available. So the “issues” are your opinion, not issues.
From the Dakota cartridges history write up: “The largest of the Dakota cartridges is the .450 Dakota. For a while, Dakota advertised a .416 cartridge but this is no longer in production. Unlike its siblings, the .450 cartridge is based on the .416 Rigby case, much like the .338 Lapua Magnum. Case capacity is near identical to the .460 Weatherby, the main difference between the two cartridges being that the .460 is loaded as fast as possible, apart from this, freebore is much the same.The downside of the Dakota cartridges include the high cost of brass, the lack of readily available factory ammunition along with the non standard case head design. This last issue is unfortunately the major limiting factor regarding the mainstream popularity of the Dakota cartridge line.”
We're you loading all rounds from the magazine or dropping them in the action and clambering? To break two so close is quite a feat and extremely worrisome.Had two CRF extactors lost claws on a 460 Brno 602 and 10.75 Mauser, a month apart. Both rifles immediately turned into expensive clubs.
A mercury dampener can be added for those who want a heavier gun. Should be less than $200 installed.Very well stated.
My criticism of the big Weatherby is pretty basic. For my taste, the 378 and 460 rifles should have been built heavier by at least a pound and a half, the wrist of the stock should have been a little thicker, and the wood and metal a lower gloss finish.
I can't say I've heard of one that had feeding, extraction or ejection issues that were not operator induced.
We're you loading all rounds from the magazine or dropping them in the action and clambering? To break two so close is quite a feat and extremely worrisome.
The extractor damage occurred during bigbore competitions where up to 40 rounds are fired in timed events. (This excludes the 200-plus rounds fired during training) At one stage, it is required to fire 8 rounds in 35 seconds. The rifles were not abused, but very much pushed to the limits. Mitigating circumstances towards the 10.75, the rifle is 99 years old. All rounds were magazine fed.We're you loading all rounds from the magazine or dropping them in the action and clambering? To break two so close is quite a feat and extremely worrisome.
I can see running a bolt that hard for that duration for years of that competition and training will eventually induce a failure. The 10.75 makes sense for its age. Even the 602 would have to give in eventually. Few shooters and even fewer hunters will ever know the punishment their rifle cant take before a failure.The extractor damage occurred during bigbore competitions where up to 40 rounds are fired in timed events. (This excludes the 200-plus rounds fired during training) At one stage, it is required to fire 8 rounds in 35 seconds. The rifles were not abused, but very much pushed to the limits. Mitigating circumstances towards the 10.75, the rifle is 99 years old. All rounds were magazine fed.
That second extractor broke the same way my 8x68 broke, I thought age fatigue but my gunsmith friend said it was caused by people (somewhere in the fifty odd years pre me) slamming the bolt closed to force a non magazine fed round to chamber without enough clearance in the "C ring cutout" to allow the extractor to clear when it flexes to go over the rim