Those here who love and play golf will understand this. My theory of rifles has always been the “golf” analogy.
You wouldn’t think of playing a course with just a putter or a driver. Your choice of club type depends on where your ball lies - the tee, the green, or in between.
Given the diversity of huntable game species worldwide - thinking squirrels to elephants - clearly more than
one rifle is needed to address that diversity, or at least that portion of it one might reasonably attempt to hunt over time.
Those who’ve hunted widely can probably cull their rifle collection down to only what is really needed, a handful, maybe 4 or 5 chamberings at best, to cover all species (for the sake of this mental exercise I’m excluding shotguns, but admittedly two of those would have to be added to my own golf bag of rifles).
In my case, if I sold off everything else and put the proceeds into the “Future Hunts Fund,” I would still retain a couple of .22lrs, a .223/5.56, my .350 Rem Mags, a .375 H&H, and a .404 Jeff. But if you count just the chamberings, it’s five. Sure some redundancy even in those, but it is what it is.
Everything I would hunt in this lifetime is covered and the golf bag doesn’t weigh a ton.
Win/win right there.