Letting some hot air out of Robert Ruark

steve white

AH ambassador
Joined
Feb 9, 2018
Messages
5,577
Reaction score
12,728
Location
dallas tx
Articles
3
Member of
dallas safari club, mannlicher collectors assoc., era
Hunted
Cape buffalo, plains game
Well, this will likely sling a skunk into the room, and not saying that Ruark did not exhibit a masterful use of the English language, but what I am suggesting is that he had not earned the right to the use of such language in Horn of the Hunter!
Just keepin' it real, as they say:
Ruark admits that he had never so much as fired a rifle, especially HIS rifles prior to the safari. Abomination!
He has zero grasp of the basics of marksmanship when firing upon his first animals, striking one antelope in the foot! Disrespectful of game.
His choice of a 220 swift is not explained, but he abandons it after seeing dismal results in blowing a ham off a warthog.
He gets talked into immediately going after a lion and "places the shot right behind the ear" a low odds horrible first shot choice, especially given the sloping skull, topped by hair.
He turns down a free leopard! (Should he have been properly prepared to hunt, this alone would constitute a reason to commit him to asylum)
He talks about how incompetent hunters place the PH at risk, while himself embodying said incompetent hunters.
He idol worships his PH as ALL first timers do when they come back as instant experts.
He proceeds to give us all sage advice, written like a thriller, while he is still wet behind the ears, and repeating good advice he's heard/just learned.
He describes armchair bullshit like facing buffalo stampedes by shooting one, then standing on it while the others stream by, really? (does he know just how rare an actual oncoming stampede is--not just the jostling forward to see whats of danger? Or how hard it is to instantly "drop" a buff?)

Entertaining reading, written about others level of experience/expertise which he adopted, as any learner should, but not authoritative. Colorful description of a beautiful land and experience which doubtlessly helped the safari industry then and now by evoking wonder and appreciation.

Still, beginner gushing, all dressed up. Your comments?
 
Last edited:
That’s exactly what it is and exactly why it is great.

His writing isn’t about how to hunt or the ballistics or technicalities.

It is a view of a magical place though the eyes of a newbie falling in love with it. It’s about the land, the people and his experiences. The life lessons he learns by being there.

No matter how much any of us prepare and hunt we will almost always be closer to Ruark than Selous. That’s the beauty of Ruark’s writing
 
That’s exactly what it is and exactly why it is great.

His writing isn’t about how to hunt or the ballistics or technicalities.

It is a view of a magical place though the eyes of a newbie falling in love with it. It’s about the land, the people and his experiences. The life lessons he learns by being there.

No matter how much any of us prepare and hunt we will almost always be closer to Ruark than Selous. That’s the beauty of Ruark’s writing
Maybe that let a little hot air out of my viewpoint. Still, I cannot recommend anyone at any time taking a safari without ever having fired their rifle.
 
First, it was a different time. There’s a lot of modern judgement passed against people who are long gone and in no position to defend what they did and what they wrote.

Unfortunately it still isn’t so unusual to see relative hunting novices on safari. Most of them do their best and have a great experience.

The vast majority of all writers aren’t as interesting as their books. I once met one of my literary heroes and found out he was a pompous jerk.

I never met Rourke or Capstick, or Hemingway, but they knew how to write, and that kept the dream alive in me until I was in a position to go see for myself.

Do any of us have beautiful photos of gorgeous creatures we shot basically from the road with minimal effort? I much prefer “earning it” but I don’t pass up gifts and unusual opportunities either. Do we correct others when they wonder in amazement at the experience?
 
how about the man(nitwit imho) who shot a bengel tiger with savage 99 in .22 hi-power and still dumber savage running a ad about. any one who has been up close to a 450-500 lbs tiger would shit razer blades if ask to hunt one with a .22 hi-power.
 
Well, this will likely sling a skunk into the room, and not saying that Ruark did not exhibit a masterful use of the English language, but what I am suggesting is that he had not earned the right to the use of such language in Horn of the Hunter!
Just keepin' it real, as they say:
Ruark admits that he had never so much as fired a rifle, especially HIS rifles prior to the safari. Abomination!
He has zero grasp of the basics of marksmanship when firing upon his first animals, striking one antelope in the foot! Disrespectful of game.
His choice of a 220 swift is not explained, but he abandons it after seeing dismal results in blowing a ham off a warthog.
He gets talked into immediately going after a lion and "places the shot right behind the ear" a low odds horrible first shot choice, especially given the sloping skull, topped by hair.
He turns down a free leopard! (Should he have been properly prepared to hunt, this alone would constitute a reason to commit him to asylum)
He talks about how incompetent hunters place the PH at risk, while himself embodying said incompetent hunters.
He idol worships his PH as ALL first timers do when they come back as instant experts.
He proceeds to give us all sage advice, written like a thriller, while he is still wet behind the ears, and repeating good advice he's heard/just learned.
He describes armchair bullshit like facing buffalo stampedes by shooting one, then standing on it while the others stream by, really? (does he know just how rare an actual oncoming stampede is--not just the jostling forward to see whats of danger? Or how hard it is to instantly "drop" a buff?)

Entertaining reading, written about others level of experience/expertise which he adopted, as any learner should, but not authoritative. Colorful description of a beautiful land and experience which doubtlessly helped the safari industry then and now by evoking wonder and appreciation.

Still, beginner gushing, all dressed up. Your comments?
I find this article fascinating. It is, to me, an earnest and believable account.

I have read most of Ruark's stuff including Something of Value and Poor No More. His work was part of my moral and literary upbringing for most of my life. Alas, some of my heroes had holes in their character big enough to throw a cat through and they drank themselves into the ground.

This post is a bit sad but it does not surprise me very much. I appreciate being informed. Thanks Steve.
 
I was excited when first reading Horn of the Hunter but didn't know what the hell he was talking about for many pages concerning the vehicle, his wife, etc. Different names for things unexplained. I guess it made me pay closer attention until the context let me figure it out. I felt it was a little overrated but it's impact on our Safari dreams isn't.
 
Keep in mind that when Ruark made his first trip to Africa, not many people knew very much about the continent. There were very few resources one could draw upon for guidance or advice. All things considered, he did well for a novice and his books became an inspiration for others to go experience safari firsthand.

How many of today’s African hunters would have even considered hunting in Africa if it wasn’t for the internet?

As to his Hero Worship of his first PH… It WAS Harry Selby, after all. ;)
 
Ruark was a fabulist. His job was to romanticize the African hunting experience. To tell tall tales about the indomitable beast of the dark continent that would haunt your dreams and nightmares. And he did a good job at that.

What he did a bad job of was portraying himself as a skilled hunter or compentent marksman. He freely admits as much in Use Enough Gun while detailing scopes that couldn't hold zero, taking unsupported shots, and a constant stream of rodeos.
 
A big part of the appeal of Horn of the Hunter is that Ruark was a rank amateur. He wasn’t trying to pass himself off as an expert. He wasn’t afraid to tell about it. In my opinion, it’s a much better read than Hemingway’s Green Hills of Africa where Papa took great pains to establish himself as an expert.
 
Also worth mentioning that even by his own account Ruark was wasted the entire time. Three martini lunches, literally. Of course he claims the alcohol didn't affect him. But his body apparently didn't get the memo since he died of liver failure at 49.

I loved "Horn of the Hunter" when I was a kid but recently reread it and yeah not so much...
 
Additionally, when you take Ruark in total (not just the single book) you get to see the transformation from that novice to a seasoned hunter. One who would eventually successfully hunt leopard on his own. He fell so in love with the continent that he couldn’t leave and became proficient in the very things he admits to be lacking in his first experience. It is a story of growth which is what all great stories are about.
 
First, it was a different time. There’s a lot of modern judgement passed against people who are long gone and in no position to defend what they did and what they wrote.

Unfortunately it still isn’t so unusual to see relative hunting novices on safari. Most of them do their best and have a great experience.

The vast majority of all writers aren’t as interesting as their books. I once met one of my literary heroes and found out he was a pompous jerk.

I never met Rourke or Capstick, or Hemingway, but they knew how to write, and that kept the dream alive in me until I was in a position to go see for myself.

Do any of us have beautiful photos of gorgeous creatures we shot basically from the road with minimal effort? I much prefer “earning it” but I don’t pass up gifts and unusual opportunities either. Do we correct others when they wonder in amazement at the experience?

Well, this will likely sling a skunk into the room, and not saying that Ruark did not exhibit a masterful use of the English language, but what I am suggesting is that he had not earned the right to the use of such language in Horn of the Hunter!
Just keepin' it real, as they say:
Ruark admits that he had never so much as fired a rifle, especially HIS rifles prior to the safari. Abomination!
He has zero grasp of the basics of marksmanship when firing upon his first animals, striking one antelope in the foot! Disrespectful of game.
His choice of a 220 swift is not explained, but he abandons it after seeing dismal results in blowing a ham off a warthog.
He gets talked into immediately going after a lion and "places the shot right behind the ear" a low odds horrible first shot choice, especially given the sloping skull, topped by hair.
He turns down a free leopard! (Should he have been properly prepared to hunt, this alone would constitute a reason to commit him to asylum)
He talks about how incompetent hunters place the PH at risk, while himself embodying said incompetent hunters.
He idol worships his PH as ALL first timers do when they come back as instant experts.
He proceeds to give us all sage advice, written like a thriller, while he is still wet behind the ears, and repeating good advice he's heard/just learned.
He describes armchair bullshit like facing buffalo stampedes by shooting one, then standing on it while the others stream by, really? (does he know just how rare an actual oncoming stampede is--not just the jostling forward to see whats of danger? Or how hard it is to instantly "drop" a buff?)

Entertaining reading, written about others level of experience/expertise which he adopted, as any learner should, but not authoritative. Colorful description of a beautiful land and experience which doubtlessly helped the safari industry then and now by evoking wonder and appreciation.

Still, beginner gushing, all dressed up. Your comments?
Any writer who can evoke such powerful responses, while writing to a fairly narrow audience, after having been dead for over sixty years, is still one helluva writer, IMHO.
Capstick himself has been accused of being a teller of tall tales. In "Death in the Long Grass" while guiding a client to his first elephant, he refers to himself as a "Correspondence School Bwana" as he himself had apparently never been in on taking an elephant!
As has been said elsewhere, Ruark and Capstick were writers who hunted, who brought their experiences to many who will never undergo safari firsthand.
For that we should be thankful.
 
I, along with @WoodFire, arrived at a remote African hunting camp only to sit down to eat alongside an honest-to-goodness world famous author. He was held in very high esteem by WoodFire until the dinner was over. Then we concluded that he must have had a ghost writer.
 
I, along with @WoodFire, arrived at a remote African hunting camp only to sit down to eat alongside an honest-to-goodness world famous author. He was held in very high esteem by WoodFire until the dinner was over. Then we concluded that he must have had a ghost writer.
Never meet your heroes!
 

Forum statistics

Threads
68,837
Messages
1,532,624
Members
157,614
Latest member
MartinaMeu
 

 

 

Latest posts

Latest profile posts

Huntforever wrote on dhoover's profile.
You’re the 2nd person on this thread from Arkansas. I live in Benton.

Do you hunt out of state much?
Enjoying hunting in the Kalahari with good FREIND Brendan HTK safaris
Stnelson wrote on Never Been's profile.
I want one of the stocks.
 
Top