Politics

fullsizeoutput_b39.jpeg
 
Actually he did, but it's hard to keep track of all the duplicates, triplicates, illegal and dead voters as well as the machines that changed votes for Trump to Biden in order to get them to vote again. To paraphrase Mark Twain, the hard part of lying is that you have to remember the lie so that it doesnt change.
 
Actually he did, but it's hard to keep track of all the duplicates, triplicates, illegal and dead voters as well as the machines that changed votes for Trump to Biden in order to get them to vote again. To paraphrase Mark Twain, the hard part of lying is that you have to remember the lie so that it doesnt change.
And the countless ballots stuffed into illegal ballot drop boxes by illegal ballot harvesting schemes in all these swing states. Maybe we should investigate these ballet harvesters... Ohh, but wait, upholding the constitution and state laws only apply when it aids the Uniparty. Never mind.


Can you imagine the FBI investigation if Donald Trump had said this? Hell perhaps the FBI will say he did say this on a white house cocktail napkin seized at Mar-a-Logo. They falsified data to get a FISA warrant to spy on a President-Elect, and again on a sitting President. There really is nothing these 'fine people' at the FBI won't due to destroy our free society.
 
Last edited:
1660591319314.png
 
1660682177508.png
 
From a friend who is a gun rights attorney in California. I thought it was pretty damn good on the state of US politics, the media, etc.

Metaphor Alert (Worse: a Sports Metaphor Alert)
This week your favorite football team is playing against the current league champions. The championship has rotated back and forth between your team and the current champions on a regular basis for the past 30 years. The games are hard-hitting, rough, tough, physical games with no quarter given by either side.

But over the past 30 years the live commontators, stadium owners, and press have taken a dislike to your team. They don’t like its colors, its mascot, its cheerleaders, its fans, its helmet logo — they don’t like anything about your team. Besides the bad press and lousy facilities, you’ve started to notice that the referees and umpires are slanting their calls on the field. Nothing obvious, but close measurements for a first down go against your team too often. Judgment calls on unsportsmanlike conduct seem to favor the other team. There hasn’t been a pass interference call made against the other team in the past four times these teams have played. But your team is penalized for questionable pass interference, holding, illegal blocks, unnecessary roughness — seems like every third play. The stadium PA system has static, or gets turned off, when introducing your team’s players. The locker room for your team is filthy and half the showers don’t work.

For a while your team’s owner, coaches, captains, and players have risen to the hostility and still won some championships over the years. But things have recently taken on a darker tone. The hostile press has started including phrases like: “Wouldn’t it be a shame if their starting quarterback was to get injured, badly?” Or: “Too bad their starting QB’s car was vandalized at the last game, hope he had insurance.” Or: “We’re only too happy to beat the other team, but we really hate their starting QB. We are at war with him. He shouldn’t be allowed to play the game.” Your starting QB gives as good as he gets. He taunts the press. He flips off the other side’s fans. He goes out of his way to antagonize the other team. He has came close to being ejected from the last game with his commments to the officials.

The first half of this week’s game has been brutal. Your team has managed to put up only a field goal, having had one touchdown called back on a bogus “offensive pass interference” penalty. The other team leads by three touchdowns. But what has really been happening on the field is a game of “Kill the Quarterback.” The referees seem to only be enforcing the rule limiting players to 11 on the field at any one time. But there are no penalties being called against the other team, and every possible penalty has been called against your team. And since the focus seems to be against your first string QB, you start to wonder if the backup QB should get out there and run few plays to see if that can turn things around.

So here’s my question: If most of the hostility is directed at your first string QB and that is what is jeopardizing the game, what is better for the team? Keep your first stringer in as long as he’s healthy? Or see if your back-up QB can turn things around.

Tough choice. I’m not claiming to have an answer.
Does the decision turn on your loyalty to the QB?
Or is this a choice about what is best for the team?
Or maybe your first string QB suggests the substitution, at least for a couple series of offensive plays.

1f914.png
 
From a friend who is a gun rights attorney in California. I thought it was pretty damn good on the state of US politics, the media, etc.

Metaphor Alert (Worse: a Sports Metaphor Alert)
This week your favorite football team is playing against the current league champions. The championship has rotated back and forth between your team and the current champions on a regular basis for the past 30 years. The games are hard-hitting, rough, tough, physical games with no quarter given by either side.

But over the past 30 years the live commontators, stadium owners, and press have taken a dislike to your team. They don’t like its colors, its mascot, its cheerleaders, its fans, its helmet logo — they don’t like anything about your team. Besides the bad press and lousy facilities, you’ve started to notice that the referees and umpires are slanting their calls on the field. Nothing obvious, but close measurements for a first down go against your team too often. Judgment calls on unsportsmanlike conduct seem to favor the other team. There hasn’t been a pass interference call made against the other team in the past four times these teams have played. But your team is penalized for questionable pass interference, holding, illegal blocks, unnecessary roughness — seems like every third play. The stadium PA system has static, or gets turned off, when introducing your team’s players. The locker room for your team is filthy and half the showers don’t work.

For a while your team’s owner, coaches, captains, and players have risen to the hostility and still won some championships over the years. But things have recently taken on a darker tone. The hostile press has started including phrases like: “Wouldn’t it be a shame if their starting quarterback was to get injured, badly?” Or: “Too bad their starting QB’s car was vandalized at the last game, hope he had insurance.” Or: “We’re only too happy to beat the other team, but we really hate their starting QB. We are at war with him. He shouldn’t be allowed to play the game.” Your starting QB gives as good as he gets. He taunts the press. He flips off the other side’s fans. He goes out of his way to antagonize the other team. He has came close to being ejected from the last game with his commments to the officials.

The first half of this week’s game has been brutal. Your team has managed to put up only a field goal, having had one touchdown called back on a bogus “offensive pass interference” penalty. The other team leads by three touchdowns. But what has really been happening on the field is a game of “Kill the Quarterback.” The referees seem to only be enforcing the rule limiting players to 11 on the field at any one time. But there are no penalties being called against the other team, and every possible penalty has been called against your team. And since the focus seems to be against your first string QB, you start to wonder if the backup QB should get out there and run few plays to see if that can turn things around.

So here’s my question: If most of the hostility is directed at your first string QB and that is what is jeopardizing the game, what is better for the team? Keep your first stringer in as long as he’s healthy? Or see if your back-up QB can turn things around.

Tough choice. I’m not claiming to have an answer.
Does the decision turn on your loyalty to the QB?
Or is this a choice about what is best for the team?
Or maybe your first string QB suggests the substitution, at least for a couple series of offensive plays.

1f914.png
Thanks for posting this. For a sports metaphor, it is fantastic.

Unless the new QB is uni-party approved, nothing will change. Only an approved QB, like Bush 43, will not get killed. An approved QB will still be tar and feathered in the public square, but behind the scenes he will achieve riches by 'playing the game' and making sure the right people win.

Anyone who thinks another quality candidate will be treated differently than Trump....Well they just don't know the left. That is the biggest problem America has. Much of the 'right' just doesn't understand the left or what they are trying to accomplish.
 
Who thinks Liz will be defeated today? I sure hope the uni-party takes a loss.

It would be amazing to think that in Wyoming, we might actually have a congressional representative for the first time in 6 years. That's right, in this supposed representative republic, we haven't had any representation in congress since 2016.

When Liz first ran for Congress, she announced her candidacy from her home in Virginia, where she had lived since 2006, where she has a drivers license, where she pays taxes, where she raised her kids. She was not, and is not a Wyoming resident. Yet in politics, it's only money that matters. Her daddy's name and political connections cleared the primary field so she could run basically unopposed in the primary. What a coincidence, amazing job opportunities just happened to open up for a couple known Wyoming residents who had considered running.

No chance of a republican losing to a democrat in Wyoming, so the primary alone landed her the job. I personally couldn't vote for a D, so I admit to voting for her in November 2016. I had many friends who were smarter than me however, they voted D for the first time in their lives just because they were furious that a Virginia resident would be allowed to run for office in Wyoming. By the way, Wyoming only has ONE congressional representative, so for 6 years we have had no representation.

But don't think Liz represented Virginia. No no no, she only represents herself and her families wealth:

Liz.jpg



Rep. Liz Cheney’s (R-WY) net worth ballooned from an estimated $7 million when she first took office in 2017 to possibly more than $44 million in 2020, according to analysis from the Center for Responsive Politics and her most recent financial disclosure forms.

Depending on where she falls in the ranges in her latest financial disclosure forms, that could represent as much as a 600 percent increase in her net worth in just a few short years in Congress–a massive boom for an already-independently wealthy political scion of the powerful Cheney family which counts among its most powerful her father, former Vice President of the United States Dick Cheney.

During Cheney’s first term in office, from 2017 to 2018, her net worth grew from the 71st ($7,036,013) to the 24th ($14,710,513) wealthiest member in the U.S. House of Representatives, the Center for Responsive Politics analysis shows.

Since then, Cheney’s net worth has continued to grow–perhaps significantly. According to her 2020 Personal Financial Disclosure former, Cheney declared her net worth was estimated between $10,422,023 and $44,140,000 stemming from assets valued between $10,432,024 and $44,155,000. Cheney reported no earned income, gifts, or transactions. Yet Cheney declared she held three posts, which include a trustee position at the University of Wyoming, a member of a holding company, and what appears to be her family’s trust.

The documents are reported in ranges, so it is unclear at this time exactly how close she falls to the top of the broader range, but even if her worth is the lower end, she still significantly increased her net worth while in office.

Cheney’s boosted net worth comes amid political controversy about how some congressional members have enriched themselves while American workers do not have the same access or connections. The median American household net worth is $121,700, NerdWallet estimated.

Notably, in 2018, Cheney’s top listed assets were Citibank ($3,000,000) and Latham & Watkins ($3,000,000). Latham & Watkins is Liz Cheney’s husband’s law firm, where Philip Perry, Cheney’s husband, has been a partner since 2017. According to Cheney’s 2020 Personal Financial Disclosure, Perry has an “equity ownership” in the firm worth between $1,000,001 and $5,000,000.

Perry’s firm has advised a Chinese Communist Party-linked technology company named TME and Exelon Corporation. The State Department in 2019 dubbed TME a tool of the Chinese government. According to the Wall Street Journal, in 2011, Exelon Corporation agreed to provide consulting and training services to an arm of the state-owned China National Nuclear Corporation (CNNC). The state-owned CNNC’s president and vice president are appointed by the highest administrative position in the Government of China, the Premier of the People’s Republic of China. The CNNC supervises all facets of China’s nuclear programs.

While Perry’s law firm has serviced Chinese clients, Cheney has sat on the Armed Services Committee with many powerful subcommittees dedicated to national security. Cheney worked with House Republicans’ on producing a 2020 report on Communist China entitled the “China Task Force Report.” The report states, “[T]he greatest generational challenge we face today is the threat of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).”

Cheney’s GOP primary opponent, Trump-endorsed Harriet Hageman, has slammed Cheney and her husband for his connections to the CCP-liked companies. Hageman believes the Perry family is “personally” and “financially benefiting from working for China,” Hageman told Just the News.

Concerning Perry’s partnership at Latham & Watkins, Cheney’s spokesman Jeremy Adler previously told Breitbart News that Perry has not financially gained from the “Chinese Government” during his partnership tenure. “Harriet is telling you an outright lie. Liz’s husband, Phil Perry, receives no financial benefit at all from any Chinese Government entity,” Adler wrote in an emailed statement. “This is pure defamation, and Harriet should be accountable for it.”

Breitbart News reached out to Cheney’s office to ask how she explains her net worth grown from an estimated from $7 million in 2017 to possibly more than $44 million in 2020 depending on where she falls in the reported ranges on her 2020 Personal Financial Disclosure document. Cheney’s office did not return a request for comment on this front.

Questions surrounding Cheney’s wealth come has she is trailing in the polls to opponent Harriet Hageman by about 30 points and predicted to lose the GOP primary on August 16. Cheney’s political approval is on a downward trend due to her fixation on fighting against former President Donald Trump on the partisan January 6 Committee. Fifty-four percent of voters were less likely to support Cheney’s reelection “because she’s part of the panel investigating the attack on the Capitol,” Casper Star-Tribune/Mason-Dixon found.

Cheney’s opposition to Trump has won her favor with many in the establishment uniparty. In recent weeks, Cheney has won endorsements from Hollywood elites and donations from Hillary Clinton and former President Barack Obama donors. She has also solicited votes from Democrats, though Joseph Barbuto, the chairman of the Wyoming Democrat Party, believes the tactic will not be effective.

Cheney has also received large amount of money from outside state donors looking to save Cheney from defeat. The incumbent has out-raised Hageman by nearly three to one. Yet Hageman has done very well with Wyoming voters, who have donated more than $1.2 million — more than four times as much as Wyoming voters have donated to Cheney, FEC data shows.

“Liz Cheney has lost Wyoming. Liz Cheney doesn’t live in Wyoming. She doesn’t represent us,” Hageman told Breitbart News. “She doesn’t represent our values.”

According to PredictIt odds, Cheney has only a three-cent chance on the dollar of winning. Trump-endorsed Harriet Hageman is favored by 97 cents on the dollar.
 
Buh bye.....Liz Cheney. Another establishment swamp rat headed for the unemployment line.
Thank God. I won’t be the only Wyoming citizen popping a special bottle tonight. Cheers to everyone.

Someone just told me “dingdong the witch is dead “. Well that’s an exaggeration. This “defeat “will be the best thing that ever happened to her. She’ll make countless millions as a lobbyist peddling influence. Every Dem owes her, and the Rino's owe her even more for carrying their water to get rid of Trump. She probably got tired of visiting Wyoming every 18 months anyway

Wonder what the CCP pays for a changed vote by McCarthy or McConnel? I will never know but I bet it’s a hell of a lot of money.
BDAEC3D8-C99D-46E7-8DA6-E2A8F78D3019.jpeg
 
Thank God. I won’t be the only Wyoming citizen popping a special bottle tonight. Cheers to everyone.

Someone just told me “dingdong the witch is dead “. Well that’s an exaggeration. This “defeat “will be the best thing that ever happened to her. She’ll make countless millions as a lobbyist peddling influence. Every Dem owes her, and the Rino's owe her even more for carrying their water to get rid of Trump. She probably got tired of visiting Wyoming every 18 months anyway

Wonder what the CCP pays for a changed vote by McCarthy or McConnel? I will never know but I bet it’s a hell of a lot of money.View attachment 483388
Cheney will probably get a book deal, and end up as an analyst on CNN.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
54,162
Messages
1,147,469
Members
93,703
Latest member
ShanaIvy5
 

 

 

Latest profile posts

sgtsabai wrote on Tanks's profile.
Business is the only way to fly. I'm headed to SA August 25. I'm hoping that business isn't an arm and a leg. If you don't mind, what airline and the cost for your trip. Mine will be convoluted. I'll be flying into the states to pick up my 416 Rigby as Thailand doesn't allow firearms (pay no attention to the daily shootings and killings) so I'll have 2 very long trips.
Vonfergus wrote on JamesJ's profile.
I am interested in the Double
Nick BOWKER HUNTING SOUTH AFRICA wrote on EGS-HQ's profile.
Hi EGS

I read your thread with interest. Would you mind sending me that PDF? May I put it on my website?

Rob
85lc wrote on Douglas Johnson's profile.
Please send a list of books and prices.
 
Top