SaintPanzer
AH fanatic
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2021
- Messages
- 973
- Reaction score
- 3,461
- Location
- Somewhere west of Laramie
- Media
- 1
- Member of
- NRA Life Member; Mannlicher Collectors Association
- Hunted
- USA, Germany, Poland
Well, I started this, so I suppose I have some responsibility to address some of the points.
I'm not normally a "slippery slope" person, but: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/brit...sfers-maid-faith-based-institutions-9.7054084
I intellectually understand the "want to have control over it" argument. But that only goes so far. Someone wants to make Hemlock Tea? OK... But surely there is a difference between that and making the tea for them. There's a further difference in taking an oath to "first, do no harm" and then using the syringe. There's an even bigger difference in actually encouraging someone to make that choice if they are on the fence.
As far as "but it gets the public health system off the hook for the greater expense of care..." argument: So Sarah Palin was right about the Death Panels? I guess blind squirrels can find nuts sometimes. Or did she just say the quiet part out loud?
I guess I can understand the point of view that physical tragedies cause depression. But we used to treat mental illnesses. Somehow, we've stopped doing that, and in this case, instead of treating the illness, a medical doctor instead encouraged succumbing to the illness. Curiously, we see that doctor's name in a lot of articles. Similarly, "we" (not just Canadians) stopped treating and started encouraging other mental illnesses, which is how we get to tragedies in BC schools or RI hockey rinks. See a pattern?
What I'm not buying is the "why not, he didn't see a future" canard. No. I know too many others who have lost limbs, been disfigured by burns, lost eyesight, etc. They inspire me by continuing to suck the marrow out of the bones of their lives. True story: In 2016, I was at the Balboa Naval Hospital, where I was told that due to (service related, but not combat related) damage to my hips, I should never run again, and may not even be able to play hockey again. Considering I've been running distance since I was 13, that was a bit of a shock. It took me aback for about three minutes, but it didn't last long. As I was walking out into the passageway from the treatment room, I saw a Lance Corporal who probably hadn't been born yet when I pinned on Captain learning how to run on his new prosthetic lower leg and foot. That changed my attitude really quick. I quickly remembered all the Stockdale I had read. The question is never: "Why me?" It's always "Why not me?"
As another example, this guy shattered his right arm, lost most of his teeth, his right eye, along with a bunch of other injuries just a month after his 21st birthday. And he persists. I'd rather be more like him, and I'd encourage others to be like him:
I'm not normally a "slippery slope" person, but: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/brit...sfers-maid-faith-based-institutions-9.7054084
I intellectually understand the "want to have control over it" argument. But that only goes so far. Someone wants to make Hemlock Tea? OK... But surely there is a difference between that and making the tea for them. There's a further difference in taking an oath to "first, do no harm" and then using the syringe. There's an even bigger difference in actually encouraging someone to make that choice if they are on the fence.
As far as "but it gets the public health system off the hook for the greater expense of care..." argument: So Sarah Palin was right about the Death Panels? I guess blind squirrels can find nuts sometimes. Or did she just say the quiet part out loud?
I guess I can understand the point of view that physical tragedies cause depression. But we used to treat mental illnesses. Somehow, we've stopped doing that, and in this case, instead of treating the illness, a medical doctor instead encouraged succumbing to the illness. Curiously, we see that doctor's name in a lot of articles. Similarly, "we" (not just Canadians) stopped treating and started encouraging other mental illnesses, which is how we get to tragedies in BC schools or RI hockey rinks. See a pattern?
What I'm not buying is the "why not, he didn't see a future" canard. No. I know too many others who have lost limbs, been disfigured by burns, lost eyesight, etc. They inspire me by continuing to suck the marrow out of the bones of their lives. True story: In 2016, I was at the Balboa Naval Hospital, where I was told that due to (service related, but not combat related) damage to my hips, I should never run again, and may not even be able to play hockey again. Considering I've been running distance since I was 13, that was a bit of a shock. It took me aback for about three minutes, but it didn't last long. As I was walking out into the passageway from the treatment room, I saw a Lance Corporal who probably hadn't been born yet when I pinned on Captain learning how to run on his new prosthetic lower leg and foot. That changed my attitude really quick. I quickly remembered all the Stockdale I had read. The question is never: "Why me?" It's always "Why not me?"
As another example, this guy shattered his right arm, lost most of his teeth, his right eye, along with a bunch of other injuries just a month after his 21st birthday. And he persists. I'd rather be more like him, and I'd encourage others to be like him:

