I strongly disagree with you. During our Mozambique hunt 30 years ago, we were the second group to hunt after the end of their 17 year long civil war and the country just reopened for hunting. It would require a very lengthy separate story, hell I could write a book about it, but demanding to be taken back to the airport probably 700 miles away wasn’t even remotely an option.
Actually, the backgrounds you mentioned would probably be extremely ill prepared to handle the situations we faced but a military background would help. Sometimes you have to make the best of a bad situation and that may involve sticking it out, in third world countries, making demands like, “take me back to the airport “, that isn’t always an option.
Your situation is VASTLY different.
The OP flew into Vic Falls, he hunted in Matetsi ECA. It’s a 45 min drive on blacktop from the Airport to the last filling station before turning into the camp at the ECA. Additionally there are countless filling stations in and around Vic Falls Airport the PH should’ve used prior to pick-up unless he was planning that. That’s hardly a 700 mile drive through a war torn country like you describe. In the OP’s situation are ZERO mitigating factors preventing him from saying bring me back to the aimport compared to your Mozambique experience. Trying to compare the two is naive and asinine, especially when numerous members on here have driven that same tar road, and passed through the same communal lands and filling stations hunting other nearby destinations.
I do agree there are certain times when “take me back to the airport” isn’t a viable option anymore, however this wasn’t one of those times. However in almost every conceivable instance that Hunter doesn’t have the “airport option”, the Hunter will have had ample opportunities before that point to pause and make a calculated decision if they still want to go through with it.
In your Mozambique instance
1) You knew of a recent 17 year long civil war. I’m sure that caused a little pause and think before booking
2) Dept. of State warnings were (and still are) ample concerning travel to Mozambique
3) Surely your outfitter and other hunters/outfitters warned you about what was going on/just went on
4) You had to have see some warning signs as you landed and/or crossed into the country and even more as you traveled into the “country” away from civilization to give a little pucker
5) I can almost guarantee you went through multiple armed checkpoints, passed rubble and destruction from the war WELL before you hit the 700 mile mark
6) I’m sure your travel agent (if used) cautioned you
7) You probably had to go a very unique route and firearms/ammunition import was a precarious issue (if allowed)
8) Even at 700 miles away if shit went sideways there are ways to get to the airport. After all you’re here meaning you got back to the airport. Whether or not it those costs are worth it is up to each of us.
I get what you’re saying though. I’ve been through more than one post reconstruction war torn country, as well as involved in combat in a country actively at war. Even as a soldier at war, there are points through out the military decision making process to stop and reevaluate/cancel or change plan. Plans get changed/scrubbed all the time as the situation changes. Ones ability to acknowledge, process, and pivot on that info/intel (sometimes very subtle) are what separates a great leader from a good leader. In my experience VERY rarely are there no signs and all hell breaks loose when you’re at the point of no return.
That said, would love to hear about your experience in Mozambique just after the civil war. I have a significantly higher risk tolerance than most and would’ve booked that trip in a heartbeat. Sounds like the OP isn’t a risk taker, and also isn’t one who does a lot of due diligence, or learned their lesson and now does given their hunts in the BVC