- Joined
- Jun 14, 2015
- Messages
- 9,285
- Reaction score
- 26,789
- Location
- Shreveport, Louisiana
- Media
- 281
- Articles
- 5
- Member of
- NRA, DSC
- Hunted
- Nam, Zam, Zim,RSA (Eastern Cape & NW), Canada, NZ, Alaska, TX, LA, MO, OH, MT, ID, WA, WY
Your naivety makes you ignorant. I see that I wrote ten years. I meant to say two years, but whatever the recent time period is a lot of the shootings have been committed by trans people. Part if the issue is that most of the media in the US and all of it in Canada tries to cover the trans connection , if possible, is because they are afraid of offending the LGBT, etc. crowd and to keep the masses ignorant. Obviously, it has worked on you.At no time have the majority of mass shooting in the United States been carried out by trans individuals. There have been some high profile shooting committed by trans folk but it never has come close to majority or vast majority.
Your hate makes you lie.
Hmmmm - Looks like the Indian stock market just had the worst day in history, I wonder how are these related?I’ve been waiting over a decade to hear someone say this….
Which is why so many of us don't trust Donald Trump.I just know not to trust the mentally ill.
BTW, being trans is no longer considered being mentally ill.BTW, I don't hate them, I just know not to trust the mentally ill.
It depends on whoBTW, being trans is no longer considered being mentally ill.
It depends on who is making the determination. Where the determination is being made also comes into it. PC (blue areas) says they aren't but common sense makes it pretty obvious.BTW, being trans is no longer considered being mentally ill.
Country music fans in the South weren't exactly "enlightened" in the 1970s there buddy.I don’t get the reference, were concert goers overly racist at the time?
For a while I had to deal with an individual that believed he was Alexander the Great. It's how he "identified." We did not cave in to his demands to to be recognized as such. Why? Because he believed something that could not possibly be true, and supporting his delusion was not in his own best interest. Now explain to me how telling someone that they really are the gender that they want to hear, as opposed to the obvious truth is in that person's best interest. They are mentally ill and their delusions should not be pandered to.Man “truly believes” he’s a woman and we’re all supposed to call him miss , does that mean the next time a schizophrenic “truly believes” he’s king of the lizard people we are all supposed to call him your highness? Both are mental conditions that convince the effected something which biologically isn’t true so why do we placate one and not the other?
Seems like you found the outliers. Approving one woman because she cant stand for long periods of time and a guy with IBS isn't a reason to jettison the whole program. Minor reforms would solve these issues.Not quite...
![]()
MAID approved for Canadian woman who could no longer cook, say U of T doctors in NYT oped
Doctors who helped write guidelines for medically assisted death also describe a Holocaust survivor who delayed the procedure and continued a meaningful lifeca.news.yahoo.com
![]()
Canadian Woman Approved for Euthanasia After Losing Ability to Cook, Doctors Warn
A Canadian woman in her 70s received approval for assisted suicide after becoming unable to cook for her family and feeling that she no longer had value, according to two Toronto psychiatrists who say Canada’s MAiD system has expanded too far. University of Toronto psychiatry professors Madeline...www.christianitydaily.com
You can also read the op-ed in NYT.
Except. It is offered as a solution instead of life saving medical procedures at times as mentioned in the articles.
And all those far right conspiracy theorists such as yourself don't? You don't think the 20%+ of Republicans that believe in Q-Anon have deep rooted psychological issues too?All the chicks with dicks running around out there definitely have deep rooted psychological issues.
The problem is that it is less about “dignity” and more about efficiency. Dignity would mean that this program would be part of a fully funded palliative care scheme. That would be a dignified way to treat people with chronic degenerative disease. Unfortunately it isn’t, because that is too expensive. As a result, the UN and critics have raised concerns how the program is used disproportionately on disabled people particularly those in the lower socioeconomic class.Seems like you found the outliers. Approving one woman because she cant stand for long periods of time and a guy with IBS isn't a reason to jettison the whole program. Minor reforms would solve these issues.
Would you like an example of a "societal benefit" for killing a murderer? A young female correctional officer that I knew personally was murdered by an offender in the prison where she worked. Her name was Jayme Bindl and she had two little kids. The scum that strangled her was already in prison for life without parole (LWOP). Now he's still in prison LWOP because politicians in this state have decided that the death penalty is cruel. Had he been executed the first time Jayme would still be alive and her children would not be motherless. Now we can assume no other female staff is safe from him. Surely society would have benefited from his execution after his first murder.The problem is that it is less about “dignity” and more about efficiency. Dignity would mean that this program would be part of a fully funded palliative care scheme. That would be a dignified way to treat people with chronic degenerative disease. Unfortunately it isn’t, because that is too expensive. As a result, the UN and critics have raised concerns how the program is used disproportionately on disabled people particularly those in the lower socioeconomic class.
The state sets the example for its citizens with how it sanctions killing another human. I don’t believe anyone has shown a societal benefit from it, whether in medicine or criminal law. Killing is about efficiency. It’s takes a lot more effort to rule it out as an option. Our societies are mired in a death cult approach to societal problems, with each side claiming the higher moral ground. Hopefully, we can get it together and live stream Maid and executions to classrooms of children so they can understand the ethics truly underlying the society they are joining.
Who considers trans as mentally normal?
The American Psychiatric Association (APA): In 2013, the APA removed "gender identity disorder" from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). It was replaced with gender dysphoria, which refers strictly to the psychological distress a person may experience due to an incongruence between their sex assigned at birth and their gender identity—not the identity itself.It depends on who is making the determination. Where the determination is being made also comes into it. PC (blue areas) says they aren't but common sense makes it pretty obvious.