Tubby’s Canteen
AH legend
If memory serves wasn’t one of the famous mobsters imprisoned for trying to invoke the fifth amendment when already pardoned? So in theory the precedent should already be set?
Oh you got me good! Now hit me with that 80's all time logic.....It appears your knowledge of aquatic faeces far exceeds your knowledge of history. Or ability to count.
Well said sir!... Like when Hawley brought up that fact @0:43If memory serves wasn’t one of the famous mobsters imprisoned for trying to invoke the fifth amendment when already pardoned? So in theory the precedent should already be set?
I think he can be brought up on contempt, I don't think the pardon covers it.
Having said that, bringing up someone on contempt charges for relying on his 5th Amendment rights seems like a dicey idea.
Well said sir!... Like when Hawley brought up that fact @0:43
"You don't have any rights because you've been pardoned....You know that and your lawyers know that and that's why they are squirming behind you."
But I probably left out a comma or used the wrong word so a fellow countryman of yours will be along shortly to drop further fertilizer on the forum and educate me on both his historical and intellectual superiority.....
to everyone in North America!
I think he can be brought up on contempt, I don't think the pardon covers it.
Having said that, bringing up someone on contempt charges for relying on his 5th Amendment rights seems like a dicey idea.
What benefit would Fauci have for not answering simple questions like, what color is your tie?,what day is it? And a few others like that.
Wonder if he is found to be in contempt will he be punished as severely as Eric Holder was?I think he can be brought up on contempt, I don't think the pardon covers it.
Having said that, bringing up someone on contempt charges for relying on his 5th Amendment rights seems like a dicey idea.
Extremists in Gaza hiding other extremists with guns in their homes. Many are related family members. One day they fight, the next day they are “civilians?” Right….You can be both.
There are plenty of such people in America, and I bet you would be upset if the U.S. government decided
You are right.I agree with your assessment, except I don't think it is that dicey. By accepting a blanket pardon he was essentially given blanket immunity, and the way Sen. Paul asked the question specifically around the dates covered by the pardon, he is going to argue the 5th is not applicable (and I have to look but there is USSC cases that support this view, sorry I can't remember them off the top of my head).
BINGO!!!he is still vulnerable to perjury charges
Josh roasted him pretty good.Well said sir!... Like when Hawley brought up that fact @0:43
"You don't have any rights because you've been pardoned....You know that and your lawyers know that and that's why they are squirming behind you."
But I probably left out a comma or used the wrong word so a fellow countryman of yours will be along shortly to drop further fertilizer on the forum and educate me on both his historical and intellectual superiority.....
to everyone in North America!
General Curtis LeMay wanted to nuke Korea at the start of the war. He believed ut would result in less death for both sides. If we look at the destruction of Korea and the amount of death that they suffered and we suffered. He may have been right.When I think of Israel and Hezbollah, or us and Iean right now, or Hiroshima, this line from Resolution comes to mind:
Virgil Cole: “Sometimes you got to kill one person early, to save from killing four or five later.”
Genevese family boss frank costello but it’s clbecause he walked out. He agreed to cooperate without cameras. They brought camerasOne of the famous mafia bosses was imprisoned for attempting to hide behind the fifth after being given blanket amnesty so there should be precedent for it. I can’t remember which boss I think the head of the Gambinos