Those aren’t forest guards. They’re tour guides of the Dacca Botanical Garden. It even says so on the uniforms.
They were purported to be the new uniforms of the Bangladesh Forest Department, which seems like far too obscure of a reference to be worth making up!
Good point but as my Mother would have said " just because someone else did something of wrong doesn't make it right when you do it too". Both were simply !ow class. I vote none of the above!
I see you're point and it's a valid one, I just offer this question........
Right! And I've always felt smokers should be kicked off our govt health care up here. Make them pay their own bill if they want to make themselves sick. Sure, we tax the crap out of the shit and maybe it helps pay my health bill (MAYBE) but I'd rather see my taxes go up than know I'm using another family's suffering and grief to pay for my health care.
Hey now, it works for the tigers.
A fistfight or a gay parade on the White House lawn. Both are equally tasteless and cras.
You're getting married? Congratulations! I guess there's hope for me yet.
At least tobacco use is heavily taxed, which should offset the extra tax burden. But chances are that a Canadian is dying of either heart disease or some form of cancer regardless. So a non-smoker is for the most part just as much of a burden on the system when they die. So are smokers really much more of a burden?
Not really that shocking when you consider population size and networking ability with social media. 125k is like 2 percent of the population of an extremely far left state. Then you add the fact the the demographics of America as a whole keep changing over the last 50yrs on top of the culture being completely different and it will be more surprising if hunting stays around in the majority of states after the next 50 years.
just remember when Andrew Jackson won his inauguration the party was so wild at the whitehouse that his staff put washtubs of whiskey and punch out in the courtyard so the guests would be lured out and then locked the doors on them. They destroyed have the furniture in the white house… I guess what I’m saying is even in 1829 gentlemen didn’t have all the supposed sense we give them the credit for.
Not so slippery. People have to eat. It's not an addiction. It's a necessity. If they eat too much it does burden our health care system. A burden we are stuck with out of necessity. The health benefits of sports FAR outweighs the detriments of potential injuries. I am happy to pay any incidental costs incurred by those who are trying to be healthy. Junkies who start on drugs for entertainment don't deserve to have the govt paying to keep them alive. Similarly, anyone who picks up a pack of cigarettes for the first time knows from the lable on it the shit is addicting and poisonous. They should also be warned on the package that if they light up, they're choosing to pay for their own healthcare. Everyone should have the freedom to choose ... as long as their choice doesn't unnecessarily affect my choices. I have better uses for my money than wasting it on people who choose to get hooked on poison.
I have a good friend who lives in Oregon. He says most of the local conversation (Bend OR area) is that it has almost no chance of actually going anywhere. I've heard, can't remember if it was from him or elsewhere, that the language on the petition is extremely vague/misleading to the people they collect signatures from. It's titled something along the lines of the "Peace Act" to make the title appealing, but no one takes the time to read what it actually supports.
