Choice between 2 rifles for Africa

enysse

AH ambassador
Joined
Jan 20, 2009
Messages
11,680
Reaction score
4,237
Media
136
Hunting reports
Africa
8
USA/Canada
1
Member of
Northeast Wisconsin SCI chapter, Lifetime member of NRA,RMEF
Hunted
Namibia, South Africa (East Cape, Guateng and Limpopo)
The 140 grain in Barnes TSX is plenty.
 

TerryR

AH veteran
Joined
May 7, 2009
Messages
112
Reaction score
22
Media
10
Member of
SCI, DSC
Take them both that way you will have a back up in the event that you have a problem with one. As to which one to use: use the one that you shoot best.
 

VonJager

AH enthusiast
Joined
Dec 24, 2009
Messages
254
Reaction score
221
Media
3
Hunting reports
Africa
2
Member of
SCI Life, DSC, NRA Life, WSF Life
Hunted
Namibia, South Africa.
I would recommend the .308 because you can get the larger bullets. I took a .300 H&H Mag with 200gr Nosler Partitions, and my Brother took a 300 win mag with 200gr Swift A-frames. The PH was not too happy when I arrived with Partitions and said I should have gone with Barnes, but when I left he was very pleased with their performance. We took 2 Kudu, 3 Gemsbok, 1 Red Hartebeest, and 2 Springbok in Namibia.

The flatter trajectory of the smaller bullets will be wasted. I like the added bullet weight, and still plenty fast in the .308.

Set Zero for 200, and away you go!
 

sestoppelman

AH ambassador
Joined
Apr 25, 2010
Messages
7,315
Reaction score
6,684
Media
169
Articles
2
Hunting reports
Africa
3
Member of
NRA, NA Hunt Club
Hunted
Tanzania, Botswana, Zimbabwe (2), Namibia (2), South Africa (2)
You'll notice a lot of prejudice against anything .270 bore here. Both the .308 and the .270 Win, either original or WSM are good rounds. More power and flatter flight with the WSM, a bit more diameter and weight with the .308. Do some research and come up with the heaviest bullet you can in the .277 bore and you will be well armed. Yes, the potential for losing your ammo is always there in which case the .308 would be easier to replace but one takes their chances in all things. Weigh all the pros and cons first.
 

joester

AH veteran
Joined
Sep 16, 2011
Messages
175
Reaction score
17
Hunting reports
Africa
2
Member of
No. Amer. Moose Foundation, Mule Deer Found; RMEF (life Member), SCI, NRA, RGS, NWTF, PF, DU, Izaac Walton League, Nat'l. Trappers Assoc.
Hunted
US / Canada/Namibia/Moz/Zim
I own & shoot both those calibers; If you are equally accurate & confident w/both rifles, IMO I'd go w/.308 with a heavy bonded bullet. I hunted large plainsgame in Namibia with an '06 and a .375 H&H (PH's guns) The .375 killed them quicker & cleaner, I'd always opt for the largest caliber, within reason.
 

Nyatiboss

AH senior member
Joined
Jul 5, 2010
Messages
52
Reaction score
5
Media
17
Hunted
South Africa, Namibia, Botswana, Zimbabwe ( before 'Bob ! ), ozambique, Zambia Tanzania, Hungary, Lithuania, UK, Alaska
Hi
Definitely take your .308.

All African animals are tough, especially the Oryx.

A good heavy bullet for it, that will expend it's energy in the animal, not zip through.

Good hunting !

All best

Tony
 

BARTFRNCS

AH enthusiast
Joined
Apr 28, 2011
Messages
304
Reaction score
21
Media
12
Hunting reports
Africa
1
Member of
RMEF DU SCI NRA
Hunted
CAR CANADA MEXICO USA RSA
I say both are too light to handle marginal shot angles remember you pay for wounded game in africa if it bleeds you bought it weather you recover it or not. So that being said opt for a 300 something 338 something or a 375H&H. its better to be overgunned than on the edge of just barrley enough. The real truth is all of your shots are not going to be perfect broadside 100yd propositions.Shoot the heavyist caliber you can be accurate with.Why would you fly 1000s of miles to africa pay daliy fees trophy fees tips and lodging costs and bring a marginal caliber rifle?
 

Norwegianwoods

Silver supporter
AH elite
Joined
Nov 12, 2011
Messages
1,208
Reaction score
267
Media
29
Hunting reports
Africa
1
Europe
1
Hunted
Norway, Sweden, England, South Africa
I agree with you BARTFRNCS, but a bigger gun is only better if you can shoot as well with it as you can with a smaller one.
So as you say. Shoot the heaviest caliber you can be accurate enough with in all situations and don't shoot if you are not confident about the shot.

I have been doing lots of tracking jobs for other hunters with and without my tracking dogs and after tracking lots of wounded and dead animals I have learned that shot placement and bullet quality is much more important than the size and speed of the bullet.
 
Joined
Sep 8, 2011
Messages
234
Reaction score
16
Media
20
Hunted
South Africa (Limpopo, Free-State, North West, Northern Cape) and Botswana (Tuli Area; Selebi-Pikwe, and Tsabong regions)
BARTFRNCS,

Hi there. I agree, one should use the largest calibre with which you are most accurate, its quite simple and very true. You have hit the mark with your statement about heavier calibre being best especially to ensure a clean dispatch and no wounded trophies that would still have to be paid for. Though you underestimate the .308 calibre too much in my opinion. It is not too light for the game mentioned especially with premium grade bullets nor should it be considered underpowered for such game. One will fair quite well with this calibre rifle on a safari abroad and need not worry, what counts anywhere in the world is shot placement- not to say one should take a buffalo with a .22. The .308 is flat enough, fast enough, hits hard enough, and is as good as any to handle marginal shots because it is a pretty accurate and 'spicy' cartridge in general. Ask any southern African national which calibre one will most likely find in the gun safes of farmers, hunters, outfitters...

I too think the .300, .338, .375 is a good bet, but the .308 is a proven calibre against African game that's stood the test.

All the best,

I say both are too light
to handle marginal shot angles remember you pay for wounded game in africa if it bleeds you bought it weather you recover it or not. So that being said opt for a 300 something 338 something or a 375H&H. its better to be overgunned than on the edge of just barrley enough. The real truth is all of your shots are not going to be perfect broadside 100yd propositions.Shoot the heavyist caliber you can be accurate with.Why would you fly 1000s of miles to africa pay daliy fees trophy fees tips and lodging costs and bring a marginal caliber rifle?
 

BARTFRNCS

AH enthusiast
Joined
Apr 28, 2011
Messages
304
Reaction score
21
Media
12
Hunting reports
Africa
1
Member of
RMEF DU SCI NRA
Hunted
CAR CANADA MEXICO USA RSA
While you can kill a buff with a 22 you have to be in range! For my money give me a 375H&H 270gr @2700fps death at any reasonable range.
 

dtenney

AH senior member
Joined
Feb 14, 2012
Messages
49
Reaction score
3
Media
7
Member of
SCI, PHASA, NRA, NWTF, RMEF
Either rifle would be fine. There is an advantage with the .308 with heavier bullets and also if you and your ammo were to be seperated during travel over, you are probably not going to readily find any 270 WSM ammo anywhere.

Pick a good bonded bullet of your choice, i.e. Nosler Partition, Swift A-Frame, Barnes TTSX, and see how they shoot in your rifle. I would stay on the heavier scale for each caliber 150 for the 270 and 180 for the 308. Once you find the right combination that shoots well, practice, practice and more practice off of shooting sticks.

Also practice shooting sitting and from other postions and the sticks at different ranges. This sounds a bit odd but jog in place for a few minutes, empty handed of course, to get your heart and breathing rate increased, similar to the excitement of a long stalk on an animal and practice shooting from different positions. Hope this helps.
 

sestoppelman

AH ambassador
Joined
Apr 25, 2010
Messages
7,315
Reaction score
6,684
Media
169
Articles
2
Hunting reports
Africa
3
Member of
NRA, NA Hunt Club
Hunted
Tanzania, Botswana, Zimbabwe (2), Namibia (2), South Africa (2)
That is sound advice.
 

graybird

AH enthusiast
Joined
Dec 23, 2010
Messages
278
Reaction score
153
Media
55
Hunting reports
Africa
2
USA/Canada
7
Member of
NRA, SCI, DSC
Hunted
South Africa (Eastern Cape and KwaZulu-Natal both twice), Saskatchewan, Oklahoma, Colorado, Texas, Nebraska, Georgia, Florida, Michigan, Mississippi
Either rifle will work fine. I would take both. My last trip over I took a 300 Win Mag and 7mm-08 using 180 gr Barnes TSX and 140 gr Nosler Partitions, respectively.

In 2010, a friend of mine took his 270 WSM and a 243 Win. He used the 270 WSM the most and dropped all of the animals you mentioned with the exception of the kudu, which he didn't really hunt.

Whichever you take, make sure you're using premium bullets. I personally like the Barnes TSX and TTSX bullets after having used them for a few years now, but anything like a Nosler Partition, Swift A-frame, North Fork, Woodleigh, etc. should serve you well.

African animals don't wear kevlar, put the bullet where it belongs and smile pretty for the camera!

Good luck on your hunt!!!
 

enysse

AH ambassador
Joined
Jan 20, 2009
Messages
11,680
Reaction score
4,237
Media
136
Hunting reports
Africa
8
USA/Canada
1
Member of
Northeast Wisconsin SCI chapter, Lifetime member of NRA,RMEF
Hunted
Namibia, South Africa (East Cape, Guateng and Limpopo)

bigboreisbest

New member
Joined
Feb 16, 2012
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I feel that either choice will work fine, I would use premium bullets (i.e. Nosler Partion; Swift A-Frame; Barnes Triple Shock, and would would favor the heavy ones, 180g in the .308, 170g in the .270 (if it's available)
 

35bore

AH legend
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
2,407
Reaction score
880
Media
74
Member of
NRA,Missouri hunters ed, SCI, Owensville Gun Club, Quail Forever
Hunted
USA, South Africa, France
After reading this thread, I think if you really want to take the 270WSM, then why not take them both.? At least that way if the ammo gets lost in transit, you could still get 308 locally. Just the extra cost of the additional rifle.
 

BARTFRNCS

AH enthusiast
Joined
Apr 28, 2011
Messages
304
Reaction score
21
Media
12
Hunting reports
Africa
1
Member of
RMEF DU SCI NRA
Hunted
CAR CANADA MEXICO USA RSA
I speak from great familiarity of the 7.62x51mm. I served as a infantryman using this cartrige on 3 continentns it is not the panacia that is described here. It has a rainbow terjectery after 300 yards and is not good at carring heavy bullets to thier target. IT DOES NOT KILL EFFECTIVELY PIERIOD!
 

sestoppelman

AH ambassador
Joined
Apr 25, 2010
Messages
7,315
Reaction score
6,684
Media
169
Articles
2
Hunting reports
Africa
3
Member of
NRA, NA Hunt Club
Hunted
Tanzania, Botswana, Zimbabwe (2), Namibia (2), South Africa (2)
I dont think anyone here espoused it as a "panacea". Its "trajectory" is no worse than most and who does much big game shooting beyond 300 yards? Within those parameters its fine. And if it is no good why did the military bring it back to augment the 5.56 as limited standard in particular for long range sniping? Its a fine "cartridge" for any "continent" and has its limitations just like all of them. What would you suggest?
 

BARTFRNCS

AH enthusiast
Joined
Apr 28, 2011
Messages
304
Reaction score
21
Media
12
Hunting reports
Africa
1
Member of
RMEF DU SCI NRA
Hunted
CAR CANADA MEXICO USA RSA
Not trying to start an argument but the US millitary uses 50bmg for anything past a few hundred meters. The fact is I took my last Eland @420 lazered meters not many people I know can effectively shoot that far but why limit yourself? Why would you place limitations on yourself if your only chance at a good animal is over 300meters away.
 

sestoppelman

AH ambassador
Joined
Apr 25, 2010
Messages
7,315
Reaction score
6,684
Media
169
Articles
2
Hunting reports
Africa
3
Member of
NRA, NA Hunt Club
Hunted
Tanzania, Botswana, Zimbabwe (2), Namibia (2), South Africa (2)
I dont disagree with any of that. Its just that your tirade against the .308 left me sort of perplexed. I dont think most hunters would attempt to shoot any animal at over 400 yards, certainly not me, regardless my cartridge. And yes while its true the .50 BMG is a much better long range round (when available) than the mere .308 or even the .300 Win mag. I doubt it is what most snipers or DM's carry in the field, and many, many long range shots well over 300 yards have been recorded in combat on every continent since the 60's. So to say it wont carry its weight just doesn't square with history.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
36,156
Messages
680,848
Members
62,332
Latest member
Evance
 

 

 

Latest profile posts

raamw wrote on neckdeep's profile.
Supply your address so I can get shipping Paypal Friend (no ) fee) is fine
Viral_SIGness wrote on Rifle57's profile.
Great person to deal with. Fast communication and quick shipper!
Sarg wrote on Philippe's profile.
Hello Philippe, did you get my PM that I sent you earlier ?

Regards Mark
raamw wrote on AfricaHunting.com's profile.
Can you advise me to properly post pix, sometimes I get it right sometimes not
Tokoloshe Safaris wrote on Milan's profile.
I do not know where this video was posted, but I would very much like to see it.
 
Top