Wondering about the Remington 30. It is based on the 1917 action- Other than having a round bridge (sans eared sight) are there issues involved with the 30 similar to the 1917s?
@BTP-KennethWRoyceDoesn't that still localize the issue with the Eddystone arsenal?
Why don't Winchester and Remington M1917s also have a similar reputation for cracking?
IMO, had Eddystones been unfairly blamed, this all would have sorted itself out after 110 years. The market would have long ago recognized that Eddys were as good as Win and Rem, and the prices would have evened out by now. Unsupportable myths get arbitraged out over time.
Did you have any thoughts on Eddystone's allegedly inferior heat-treatment, or is that baseless legend?
Regards,
Kenneth
Glad you've a pair of good receivers that are handling .505 Gibbs without complaint.I don't know of any difference in heat treatment.
My 2 Eddystone M17s are fed a constant diet of loads that run at 62,000psi without issue
My gunsmith has made them into bespoke big boomers like the 505 Gibbs and never had an issue
In his humble opinion the reason Eddystone ore cheaper is because they haven't got the Winchester or Remington stamp.
Thanks for the Dunlap page. I'd read that long ago. My .35 Whelen A.I. is a Remington M1917, with even a Rem 700 knurled bolt knob nicely welded on as an homage. The rifle saw some excellent gunsmithing, and I'm fortunate to own it now. The notes from the elderly original owner are helpful and charming. Included dies and formed cases. Probably an estate sale rifle before I found it at a show....Remingtons are preferred for custom riflemaking, largely in part to the solid rear bridge that doesnt need filling but also due to consistency in steel.
30 06What caliber is it in currently?
Glad you've a pair of good receivers that are handling .505 Gibbs without complaint.
And, the rumors saved you some money on the Eddys. You won that episode. Good hunting!