The Cannon Myth: Why I'd Rather Hit Than Bruise

A .375 with a solid for the Tiny Ten? Nothing quite says subtle and proportionate like bringing a buffalo rifle to something that weighs less than the rifle itself.:cool:
Actually the 375 with solids is perfect for the little guys. One little hole in and one out. Yeah! If your were specifically hunting them something like a 22 Hornet would work nicley but most folks won't want to pack a Hornet for just the small guys.
 
1. Proper shot placement is the most important aspect.
2. Properly fitted rifle.
3. Shot as big a rifle as you can shoot accurately 100% of the time.
4. Understand your strengths and weakness as a shooter/hunter and know when to walk away from a shot.
5. Show up in shape for the hunt!!!!!!!!!, doesn't do you or the PH team any good if you can stay on track for the duration of the hunt.
6. enjoy the experience first and foremost.

I have shot big bore since i was a young lad. Everyone's recoil tolerance is different. some folks top out at the wicked recoil of a 30/06 and others at 4 bore.

There has been many different threads where we have discussed recoil management, proper shot placement on all of the worlds game at length. So read them as you prepare for your DG hunt.
Before I post my own thoughts I have to reply to AZDAVE’s post, as it made me smile. I recently finished a very enjoyable buffalo hunt that checked all those boxes, except for #3. Instead of using the biggest rifle I shoot accurately , which would be a 470, I showed up with the smallest caliber rifle with which I’ve ever intentionally hunted buffalo. So, using Dave’s schedule…
#1Yes I shot him very well with first shot, and 2nd shot and 3rd shot, all of which were fired in 11 seconds total. Buffalo went 30 yards from first shot to dead. Woulda been faster but the grass was tall and couldn’t see him good after first shot.
#2 yes my rifle fits me like an extension of my arm. And I’m on my 2nd barrel with this gun. 41 years hunting with it.
#3, NOPE - it was my .338 win mag, shooting 225 grain Northfork solids and Barnes TTSX.
#4, I was fully prepared to let any buffalo walk unless I got a good shot angle. Lone Dugga Boy, completely unaware of us and relaxed. First shot was about 50-60 yards, quartering away to left side, left leg forward at the shot. Bullet, a solid, got left lung, top of heart and lodged in right shoulder.
#5, we walked 7-10 miles each day, mostly in sand rivers so it was a good workout for all.
#6, I enjoyed it immensely! I’ve always wanted to shoot a Buffalo with my .338, but next time it’ll be back to my .416 which really is a lot more appropriate for Buffalo. .416 is my usual ‘Go-To’ for buffalo, though I’ve also used .375 H&H, .458 Win Mag & 470 NE. I won’t intentionally shoot another buffalo with my .338, but wouldn’t hesitate to shoot another if it’s what is in my hands and we bump into a bull I want.
 
Last edited:
Congratulations on a great hunt. On my hunt in August I had my 338 for PG and my PH said if we run into a big bull don't hesitate to shoot it with the 338. Shot and angle need to be perfect, but it can get the job done. It just offers very little if any margin for error.
 
Before I post my own thoughts I have to reply to AZDAVE’s post, as it made me smile. I recently finished a very enjoyable buffalo hunt that checked all those boxes, except for #3. Instead of using the biggest rifle I shoot accurately , which would be a 470, I showed up with the smallest caliber rifle with which I’ve ever intentionally hunted buffalo. So, using Dave’s schedule…
#1Yes I shot him very well with first shot, and 2nd shot and 3rd shot, all of which were fired in 11 seconds total. Buffalo went 30 yards from first shot to dead. Woulda been faster but the grass was tall and couldn’t see him good after first shot.
#2 yes my rifle fits me like an extension of my arm. And I’m on my 2nd barrel with this gun. 41 years hunting with it.
#3, NOPE - it was my .338 win mag, shooting 225 grain Northfork solids and Barnes TTSX.
#4, I was fully prepared to let any buffalo walk unless I got a good shot angle. Lone Dugga Boy, completely unaware of us and relaxed. First shot was about 50-60 yards, quartering away to left side, left leg forward at the shot. Bullet, a solid, got left lung, top of heart and lodged in right shoulder.
#5, we walked 7-10 miles each day, mostly in sand rivers so it was a good workout for all.
#6, I enjoyed it immensely! I’ve always wanted to shoot a Buffalo with my .338, but next time it’ll be back to my .416 which really is a lot more appropriate for Buffalo. .416 is my usual ‘Go-To’ for buffalo, though I’ve also used .375 H&H, .458 Win Mag & 470 NE. I won’t intentionally shoot another buffalo with my .338, but wouldn’t hesitate to shoot another if it’s what is in my hands and we bump into a bull I want.
Very interesting indeed.
Kudos, you may have just single-handedly given quite a few of the more vocal naysayers something to think about.:LOL:

Always nice when the evidence does the debating for us.
 
Happy for you DLSJR :)

Entire herds of Buffalo fell to the .318 Westley Richards throwing a 250 gr jacketed lead .320 bullet at 2,400 fps.

No doubt a modern 250 gr bonded or 225 gr monolithic .338 slug launching at 2,800 fps will be devastating in the right spot. In my own experience it certainly is on Moose, and some are as big as Buff.

My own digression from .470 NE, 416 Rigby, and .458 Lott on Buff was with the 9.3x62 (.366) throwing a 286 gr TSX at 2,330 fps. Amazingly effective in the right spot.

I wanted to see for myself that my wife is not under-gunned for a careful stalk and a careful shot. She is not :). As entire herds fell to the load in German colonial Africa, Buff still fall to it today.

Of course, it would not come to mind to any sane person -- or should we say any person with real experience hunting DG? -- to gamble that she will stop with that gun a charging Buff that did not get the memo that it is dead. Which is why I watch over her with the Lott, and the PH with his own "cannon", when she stalks Buff. Just saying :rolleyes: :ROFLMAO:

Yep, it is nice when 100 years of actual hunting history and DG stopping consensus does the debating for us :A Gathering:
 
Last edited:
For sure, "bring enough gun"
But let us add "do not bring more gun than you can shoot well"
And "bring the gun you like"
(PS as long as it is legal)

1- The issue with the argument "just make sure your first shot counts" -- which is a solid recommendation -- is that often enough the first shot actually does kill clinically, but the DG is still ambulatory enough to do damage. There is so much evidence of DG charging with a perforated heart and collapsed lungs that I do not expect this point to be challenged.

And occasionally a first shot hits a branch; or the animal moves as the sear breaks; etc. etc. or God forbid :eek::oops: !!! the shooting is not perfect :E Rofl:

So, doing one's best to not cause of wounded DG situation is the right approach, one I practice myself, but the outcomes remains an act of faith.


2- The issue with the argument "any caliber will brain an Ele or Buff and this will stop the charge" is that a Ele or Buff brain is a lot smaller a target and a lot more difficult to hit on a charging bull than a full head.

There is ton of documentary evidence, and entire books were written by folks who killed more DG than any of us will ever encounter, with more calibers than any of us will ever own (e.g. Taylor) that a larger "stopper" caliber (.45+) can damage or stun a charging DG enough to buy a few seconds for a more final shot. I also do not expect this point to be challenged.


3- So, in the end, the question is not whether one trades a "cannon bruise" for a "laser-like hit" with a .375 because this is a false dichotomy: a .458 in the right hands is just as accurate as a .375. The question comes back, as previously discussed, to personal abilities, personal beliefs, and personal choice.

Some believe they will shoot well enough that they will never wound; some prefer a one-rifle safari approach; some dislike heavy recoil; some dislike carrying heavy guns; etc. etc. and on the other end, some are not bothered by the weight and recoil of a stopper caliber, and want to be best equipped should things get dicey.

As long as the choice is legal, and I will add, ethical in respect to the animal and the potential danger it causes to PH & trackers, this is a personal choice.

Certainly, the wisdom has long been established (the "bottom lines" I was proposing earlier):
-- make the first shot count;
-- shoot a caliber you can reliably shoot;
-- do not confuse killing and stopping;
-- a client's job & gun are different from a PH's job & gun;
-- etc.

And the wisdom has been captured in legal requirements (minimum calibers), as well as famous quotes, "it is the dead ones that kill you"; "bring enough gun"; etc.


4 - The two root causes, I guess, of the discussion we are having, and that has been had many, many times before us today, is that:
  • "a man's got to know his limitations" is generally and sadly not included with "bring enough gun", and that translates to "do not bring more gun than you can shoot well"
  • "there is more than one way to skin a cat"
I am on the side of "shoot well", "first shot count", "do your best not to wound" etc. and if indeed you cannot shoot a .458 or .416, then you must shoot a .375. And even if you can shoot a "cannon" well, by all means, bring a .375 if you prefer. It is no peashooter, and it is legal and ethical.

I personally think that IF YOU CAN shoot a 40+ or 45+ caliber well on DG you have an edge on TIA, and both historic and current PHs choices place me in a comfortable vast majority. Darn close to unanimity, actually. I respect this entourage (y)

But IF YOU CANNOT shoot a 40+ or 45+ caliber well on DG, like my wife for example, it does not make you a lesser hunter or human being, and going down to a .375 is not a choice or a trade, it is an absolute necessity. Or, as in her case, even going down to a 9.3x62 is the right decision.

And if you can shoot a 40+ or 45+ caliber well on DG but you PREFER a .375, by all means have it your way, it does not bother me in the slightest, and it certainly does not irritate me, but do not distort the reality that a stopping rifle is a not myth, or that it can be shot accurately :)
As usual we are close in agreement. I absolutely concur that a .375 is not a "stopping rifle." But neither is a 400 gr bullet from a .416 or .404. A 500 gr from a .458 Lott might be one, though I still think for your wife's sake, you better hit that brain. A 570 gr bullet from a 500 certainly is one, but as we reach the 500's it becomes ever trickier to make that exact first shot which solves everything without this debate.

I keep hearing of these buffalo shot through the heart that get up and charge or being forced to track a double lunged one for miles while he sets up an ambush. I have yet to meet one.

I am a fan of Sir Walter Scott, and chapter 27 of "The Talisman" has the famous if apocryphal meeting between Richard the Lionheart and Sultan Saladin where they compare their weapons. Apologies to those unwilling to wade through 19th century prose. But it isn't much longer than one of @One Day... 's posts. :A Whistle:

‘Had I not,’ said Saladin, ‘seen this brand flaming in the front of battle, like that of Azrael, I had scarce believed that human arm could wield it. Might I request to see the Melech Ric strike one blow with it in peace, and in pure trial of strength?’
‘Willingly, noble Saladin,’ answered Richard; and looking around for something whereon to exercise his strength, he saw a steel mace held by one of the attendants, the handle being of the same metal, and about an inch and a half in diameter. This he placed on a block of wood.
The anxiety of De Vaux for his master’s honour led him to whisper in English, ‘For the blessed Virgin’s sake, beware what you attempt, my liege! Your full strength is not as yet returned, give no triumph to the infidel.’
‘Peace, fool!’ said Richard, standing firm on his ground, and casting a fierce glance around; ‘thinkest thou that I can fail in his presence?’
The glittering broadsword, wielded by both his hands, rose aloft to the King’s left shoulder, circled round his head, descended with the sway of some terrific engine, and the bar of iron rolled on the ground in two pieces, as a woodsman would sever a sapling with a hedging-bill.
‘By the head of the Prophet, a most wonderful blow!’ said the Soldan, critically and accurately examining the iron bar which had been cut asunder; and the blade of the sword was so well tempered as to exhibit not the least token of having suffered by the feat it had performed. He then took the King’s hand, and looking on the size and muscular strength which it exhibited, laughed as he placed it beside his own, so lank and thin, so inferior in brawn and sinew.
‘Ay, look well,’ said De Vaux in English, ‘it will be long ere your long jackanape’s fingers do such a feat with your fine gilded reaping-hook there.’
‘Silence, De Vaux,’ said Richard; ‘by Our Lady, he understands or guesses thy meaning, be not so broad, I pray thee.’
The Soldan, indeed, presently said, ‘Something I would fain attempt, though wherefore should the weak show their inferiority in presence of the strong? Yet each land hath its own exercises, and this may be new to the Melech Ric’. So saying, he took from the floor a cushion of silk and down, and placed it upright on one end. ‘Can thy weapon, my brother, sever that cushion?’ he said to King Richard.
‘No, surely,’ replied the King; ‘no sword on earth, were it the Excalibur of King Arthur, can cut that which opposes no steady resistance to the blow.’
‘Mark, then,’ said Saladin; and tucking up the sleeve of his gown, showed his arm, thin indeed and spare, but which constant exercise had hardened into a mass consisting of nought but bone, brawn, and sinew. He unsheathed his scimitar, a curved and narrow blade, which glittered not like the swords of the Franks, but was, on the contrary, of a dull blue colour, marked with ten millions of meandering lines, which showed how anxiously the metal had been welded by the armourer. Wielding this weapon, apparently so inefficient when compared to that of Richard, the Soldan stood resting his weight upon his left foot, which was slightly advanced; he balanced himself a little, as if to steady his aim; then stepping at once forward, drew the scimitar across the cushion, applying the edge so dexterously, and with so little apparent effort, that the cushion seemed rather to fall asunder than to be divided by violence.
‘It is a juggler’s trick,’ said De Vaux, darting forward and snatching up the portion of the cushion which had been cut off, as if to assure himself of the reality of the feat; ‘there is gramarye in this.’
The Soldan seemed to comprehend him, for he undid the sort of veil which he had hitherto worn, laid it double along the edge of his sabre, extended the weapon edgeways in the air, and drawing it suddenly through the veil, although it hung on the blade entirely loose, severed that also into two parts, which floated to different sides of the tent, equally displaying the extreme temper and sharpness of the weapon, and the exquisite dexterity of him who used it.


Rapier (or in this case scimitar) or broadsword. Both can be absolutely lethal and both equally can cause a very long afternoon.
 
Last edited:
Congratulations on a great hunt. On my hunt in August I had my 338 for PG and my PH said if we run into a big bull don't hesitate to shoot it with the 338. Shot and angle need to be perfect, but it can get the job done. It just offers very little if any margin for error.
It is often considered a perfect choice for eland, which though admittedly wired differently, still may weigh 500 lbs more than that dugga boy.
 
What I have read and heard from various PHs, including Buzz Charlton, is that if you miss the brain slightly on an elephant, better to miss it slightly with a 458 Lott than with a 375 H & H. Apparently it buys you more time to make a better 2nd shot.

I don’t know.

Never miss the first one. :cool:
 
Before I post my own thoughts I have to reply to AZDAVE’s post, as it made me smile. I recently finished a very enjoyable buffalo hunt that checked all those boxes, except for #3. Instead of using the biggest rifle I shoot accurately , which would be a 470, I showed up with the smallest caliber rifle with which I’ve ever intentionally hunted buffalo. So, using Dave’s schedule…
#1Yes I shot him very well with first shot, and 2nd shot and 3rd shot, all of which were fired in 11 seconds total. Buffalo went 30 yards from first shot to dead. Woulda been faster but the grass was tall and couldn’t see him good after first shot.
#2 yes my rifle fits me like an extension of my arm. And I’m on my 2nd barrel with this gun. 41 years hunting with it.
#3, NOPE - it was my .338 win mag, shooting 225 grain Northfork solids and Barnes TTSX.
#4, I was fully prepared to let any buffalo walk unless I got a good shot angle. Lone Dugga Boy, completely unaware of us and relaxed. First shot was about 50-60 yards, quartering away to left side, left leg forward at the shot. Bullet, a solid, got left lung, top of heart and lodged in right shoulder.
#5, we walked 7-10 miles each day, mostly in sand rivers so it was a good workout for all.
#6, I enjoyed it immensely! I’ve always wanted to shoot a Buffalo with my .338, but next time it’ll be back to my .416 which really is a lot more appropriate for Buffalo. .416 is my usual ‘Go-To’ for buffalo, though I’ve also used .375 H&H, .458 Win Mag & 470 NE. I won’t intentionally shoot another buffalo with my .338, but wouldn’t hesitate to shoot another if it’s what is in my hands and we bump into a bull I want.
Buffalo with a .338 WM, I’ve always wondered about this very scenario. I’ve dreamt of being the first to write on this project. I’m glad to say if I’m only the second, I still have a long way to go.

Thanks for your candid writing.
 
As usual we are close in agreement. I absolutely concur that a .375 is not a "stopping rifle." But neither is a 400 gr bullet from a .416 or .404. A 500 gr from a .458 Lott might be one, though I still think you better hit that brain. A 570 gr bullet from a 500 certainly is one, but as we reach the 500's it becomes ever trickier to make that exact first shot which solves everything without this debate.

I am a fan of Sir Walter Scott, and chapter 27 of "The Talisman" has the famous if apocryphal meeting between Richard the Lionheart and Sultan Saladin where they compare their weapons.

‘Had I not,’ said Saladin, ‘seen this brand flaming in the front of battle, like that of Azrael, I had scarce believed that human arm could wield it. Might I request to see the Melech Ric strike one blow with it in peace, and in pure trial of strength?’
‘Willingly, noble Saladin,’ answered Richard; and looking around for something whereon to exercise his strength, he saw a steel mace held by one of the attendants, the handle being of the same metal, and about an inch and a half in diameter. This he placed on a block of wood.
The anxiety of De Vaux for his master’s honour led him to whisper in English, ‘For the blessed Virgin’s sake, beware what you attempt, my liege! Your full strength is not as yet returned, give no triumph to the infidel.’
‘Peace, fool!’ said Richard, standing firm on his ground, and casting a fierce glance around; ‘thinkest thou that I can fail in his presence?’
The glittering broadsword, wielded by both his hands, rose aloft to the King’s left shoulder, circled round his head, descended with the sway of some terrific engine, and the bar of iron rolled on the ground in two pieces, as a woodsman would sever a sapling with a hedging-bill.
‘By the head of the Prophet, a most wonderful blow!’ said the Soldan, critically and accurately examining the iron bar which had been cut asunder; and the blade of the sword was so well tempered as to exhibit not the least token of having suffered by the feat it had performed. He then took the King’s hand, and looking on the size and muscular strength which it exhibited, laughed as he placed it beside his own, so lank and thin, so inferior in brawn and sinew.
‘Ay, look well,’ said De Vaux in English, ‘it will be long ere your long jackanape’s fingers do such a feat with your fine gilded reaping-hook there.’
‘Silence, De Vaux,’ said Richard; ‘by Our Lady, he understands or guesses thy meaning, be not so broad, I pray thee.’
The Soldan, indeed, presently said, ‘Something I would fain attempt, though wherefore should the weak show their inferiority in presence of the strong? Yet each land hath its own exercises, and this may be new to the Melech Ric’. So saying, he took from the floor a cushion of silk and down, and placed it upright on one end. ‘Can thy weapon, my brother, sever that cushion?’ he said to King Richard.
‘No, surely,’ replied the King; ‘no sword on earth, were it the Excalibur of King Arthur, can cut that which opposes no steady resistance to the blow.’
‘Mark, then,’ said Saladin; and tucking up the sleeve of his gown, showed his arm, thin indeed and spare, but which constant exercise had hardened into a mass consisting of nought but bone, brawn, and sinew. He unsheathed his scimitar, a curved and narrow blade, which glittered not like the swords of the Franks, but was, on the contrary, of a dull blue colour, marked with ten millions of meandering lines, which showed how anxiously the metal had been welded by the armourer. Wielding this weapon, apparently so inefficient when compared to that of Richard, the Soldan stood resting his weight upon his left foot, which was slightly advanced; he balanced himself a little, as if to steady his aim; then stepping at once forward, drew the scimitar across the cushion, applying the edge so dexterously, and with so little apparent effort, that the cushion seemed rather to fall asunder than to be divided by violence.
‘It is a juggler’s trick,’ said De Vaux, darting forward and snatching up the portion of the cushion which had been cut off, as if to assure himself of the reality of the feat; ‘there is gramarye in this.’
The Soldan seemed to comprehend him, for he undid the sort of veil which he had hitherto worn, laid it double along the edge of his sabre, extended the weapon edgeways in the air, and drawing it suddenly through the veil, although it hung on the blade entirely loose, severed that also into two parts, which floated to different sides of the tent, equally displaying the extreme temper and sharpness of the weapon, and the exquisite dexterity of him who used it.


Rapier (or in this case scimitar) or broadsword. While I keep hearing of these buffalo shot through the heart that get up and charge or being forced to track a double lunged one for miles while he sets up an ambush, I have yet to meet one. Both can be absolutely lethal and both equally can cause a very long afternoon.
I would go as far as to say that even a large caliber “stopping” rifle bullet placed in the wrong place is not going to stop a Buffalo or an Elephant. I am taking into account that we are talking about stopping a charging, adrenaline filled animal, not taking a heart/lung shot on an unaware animal. To stop an animal immediately you need to hit the brain/CNS. A mortally wounded animal can severely injure or kill someone before it bleeds to death. You can go and find video after video of elephants and buffalo essentially ignoring shots made at close range by experienced PH’s that didn’t hit the brain and they never even flinched. I would say that the larger calibers are certainly less likely to deflect from an odd angle hit to be sure, but that is not a guaranteed stop. I would say that some of the really big rifles have a chance of turning a marginal hit into a lethal one potentially, but again no guarantee.
 
I’ve never heard of a PH being disappointed when a client arrives in camp with a scoped 375.

If you want “insurance” in case your first shot is poor, and if the follow up results in an honest to goodness charge (not a buffalo simply seeking to regain its feet), and if the PH’s rifle jams, or he doesn’t have a clear shot or is inept, and if your shot while the buffalo is charging misses the brain or spine, and if you think an additional tenth of an inch (or five hundredths) of bore diameter causes a shot the the shoulder or brisket to turn a charge, than you have a good reason for your 40+bore. I don’t think the opposite end of the ~20 ft lbs of additional recoil is going to shake a 1600lb buffalo much.

It may be good to remember that when most of the 40 calibers and NE cartridges were developed, the bullets, particularly softs, were crap by today’s standards, and so were optics. The 375 was quite lethal then, and is even more effective now. Do I like doubles and classic cartridges? I sure do. Is it because they are more effective? Not really.
 
It is often considered a perfect choice for eland, which though admittedly wired differently, still may weigh 500 lbs more than that dugga boy.
Both are big animals, but buffalo definitely built different. Eland are the big bullies on the playground that that go down as soon as you punch em in the nose. Buffalo are the bad asses that keep getting more pissed the more you hit em. Adrenaline by the gallon.
 
Both are big animals, but buffalo definitely built different. Eland are the big bullies on the playground that that go down as soon as you punch em in the nose. Buffalo are the bad asses that keep getting more pissed the more you hit em. Adrenaline by the gallon.
I acknowledged they are different. But, adrenaline disappears with a properly placed bullet. I keep hearing of these buffalo "shot through the heart" that then get up and charge. Or the bull that was "double lunged" or "shot through the chest" that goes for a mile to set up a carefully planned ambush. I have yet to meet that animal. The problem animal is almost always a misplaced first shot which may have had absolutely nothing to do with the man with the rifle - that intervening twig scenario. But as much as we hate to admit it, it is usually our mistake and chambering would have made no difference.
 
As usual we are close in agreement. I absolutely concur that a .375 is not a "stopping rifle." But neither is a 400 gr bullet from a .416 or .404. A 500 gr from a .458 Lott might be one, though I still think for your wife's sake, you better hit that brain. A 570 gr bullet from a 500 certainly is one, but as we reach the 500's it becomes ever trickier to make that exact first shot which solves everything without this debate.

I keep hearing of these buffalo shot through the heart that get up and charge or being forced to track a double lunged one for miles while he sets up an ambush. I have yet to meet one.

I am a fan of Sir Walter Scott, and chapter 27 of "The Talisman" has the famous if apocryphal meeting between Richard the Lionheart and Sultan Saladin where they compare their weapons. Apologies to those unwilling to wade through 19th century prose. But it isn't much longer than one of @One Day... 's posts. :A Whistle:

‘Had I not,’ said Saladin, ‘seen this brand flaming in the front of battle, like that of Azrael, I had scarce believed that human arm could wield it. Might I request to see the Melech Ric strike one blow with it in peace, and in pure trial of strength?’
‘Willingly, noble Saladin,’ answered Richard; and looking around for something whereon to exercise his strength, he saw a steel mace held by one of the attendants, the handle being of the same metal, and about an inch and a half in diameter. This he placed on a block of wood.
The anxiety of De Vaux for his master’s honour led him to whisper in English, ‘For the blessed Virgin’s sake, beware what you attempt, my liege! Your full strength is not as yet returned, give no triumph to the infidel.’
‘Peace, fool!’ said Richard, standing firm on his ground, and casting a fierce glance around; ‘thinkest thou that I can fail in his presence?’
The glittering broadsword, wielded by both his hands, rose aloft to the King’s left shoulder, circled round his head, descended with the sway of some terrific engine, and the bar of iron rolled on the ground in two pieces, as a woodsman would sever a sapling with a hedging-bill.
‘By the head of the Prophet, a most wonderful blow!’ said the Soldan, critically and accurately examining the iron bar which had been cut asunder; and the blade of the sword was so well tempered as to exhibit not the least token of having suffered by the feat it had performed. He then took the King’s hand, and looking on the size and muscular strength which it exhibited, laughed as he placed it beside his own, so lank and thin, so inferior in brawn and sinew.
‘Ay, look well,’ said De Vaux in English, ‘it will be long ere your long jackanape’s fingers do such a feat with your fine gilded reaping-hook there.’
‘Silence, De Vaux,’ said Richard; ‘by Our Lady, he understands or guesses thy meaning, be not so broad, I pray thee.’
The Soldan, indeed, presently said, ‘Something I would fain attempt, though wherefore should the weak show their inferiority in presence of the strong? Yet each land hath its own exercises, and this may be new to the Melech Ric’. So saying, he took from the floor a cushion of silk and down, and placed it upright on one end. ‘Can thy weapon, my brother, sever that cushion?’ he said to King Richard.
‘No, surely,’ replied the King; ‘no sword on earth, were it the Excalibur of King Arthur, can cut that which opposes no steady resistance to the blow.’
‘Mark, then,’ said Saladin; and tucking up the sleeve of his gown, showed his arm, thin indeed and spare, but which constant exercise had hardened into a mass consisting of nought but bone, brawn, and sinew. He unsheathed his scimitar, a curved and narrow blade, which glittered not like the swords of the Franks, but was, on the contrary, of a dull blue colour, marked with ten millions of meandering lines, which showed how anxiously the metal had been welded by the armourer. Wielding this weapon, apparently so inefficient when compared to that of Richard, the Soldan stood resting his weight upon his left foot, which was slightly advanced; he balanced himself a little, as if to steady his aim; then stepping at once forward, drew the scimitar across the cushion, applying the edge so dexterously, and with so little apparent effort, that the cushion seemed rather to fall asunder than to be divided by violence.
‘It is a juggler’s trick,’ said De Vaux, darting forward and snatching up the portion of the cushion which had been cut off, as if to assure himself of the reality of the feat; ‘there is gramarye in this.’
The Soldan seemed to comprehend him, for he undid the sort of veil which he had hitherto worn, laid it double along the edge of his sabre, extended the weapon edgeways in the air, and drawing it suddenly through the veil, although it hung on the blade entirely loose, severed that also into two parts, which floated to different sides of the tent, equally displaying the extreme temper and sharpness of the weapon, and the exquisite dexterity of him who used it.


Rapier (or in this case scimitar) or broadsword. Both can be absolutely lethal and both equally can cause a very long afternoon.

Yet again we agree violently. I have often argued that the .40+ are NOT stoppers, that the .458 Win is marginal, even with modern loads, and that the Lott 500 gr is where things start. No doubt the .500 570 gr is yet better (y)

And as to making that first shot which solves everything without this debate, ever trickier, you are precisely pointing at the primary reason why I swapped my double .470 for my scoped R8 .458, the NE and the Lott being essentially ballistic performance twins.

As to Buff shot on the ground that suddenly stand up, I will tell you that I have seen it myself, and I would also point to YouTube where too numerous to count videos show it, but let us remain between Gentlemen whose word we take, as I am sure you have seen in Africa things I have not yet, and in this case I have seen something you have not yet. It will come :)

Although I like you :love::E Rofl: I do not like your broad sword vs rapier analogy :sick::E Rofl:

Let me explain. The power-wielding of a broad sword is eons away from the fencing of a rapier. I will make my own call to the arts, presenting as evidence the fight between Rob Roy MacGregor and Archibald Cunningham.

When you make the broad sword vs rapier argument it infers that one deploys a .458 or the .500 fundamentally differently from a .375. Limiting my test sample to just one, I am willing to take a serious wager than you swing your .470 or .500 just as well and fundamentally the same way as you swing your .375. Both actually are rapiers :cool:

If you want to extend the test sample to two, I will volunteer being chronometered and the target scores being compared whether I have the .375 or the .458 pipe bolted on the R8. Both actually are rapiers :cool:

Frederick Courteney Selous' black powder 4 bore may have been the broad sword.

Talking about swinging the .470, I think that a better analogy would be between a 20 gauge quail gun and a 12 gauge duck gun. One is very much more powerful than the other, and considerably heavier, but those are fundamentally the same type of weapons wielded the same way.

As to leaving the big guns home when you go to Africa, I seem to remember that it had very much to do with you hating to schlep heavy guns in the bush, and loving the simplicity of a one-rifle safari, both arguments pointing squarely to a .375 ;) --- which I agree will kill anything.
 
Last edited:
As usual we are close in agreement. I absolutely concur that a .375 is not a "stopping rifle." But neither is a 400 gr bullet from a .416 or .404. A 500 gr from a .458 Lott might be one, though I still think for your wife's sake, you better hit that brain. A 570 gr bullet from a 500 certainly is one, but as we reach the 500's it becomes ever trickier to make that exact first shot which solves everything without this debate.

I keep hearing of these buffalo shot through the heart that get up and charge or being forced to track a double lunged one for miles while he sets up an ambush. I have yet to meet one.

I am a fan of Sir Walter Scott, and chapter 27 of "The Talisman" has the famous if apocryphal meeting between Richard the Lionheart and Sultan Saladin where they compare their weapons. Apologies to those unwilling to wade through 19th century prose. But it isn't much longer than one of @One Day... 's posts. :A Whistle:

‘Had I not,’ said Saladin, ‘seen this brand flaming in the front of battle, like that of Azrael, I had scarce believed that human arm could wield it. Might I request to see the Melech Ric strike one blow with it in peace, and in pure trial of strength?’
‘Willingly, noble Saladin,’ answered Richard; and looking around for something whereon to exercise his strength, he saw a steel mace held by one of the attendants, the handle being of the same metal, and about an inch and a half in diameter. This he placed on a block of wood.
The anxiety of De Vaux for his master’s honour led him to whisper in English, ‘For the blessed Virgin’s sake, beware what you attempt, my liege! Your full strength is not as yet returned, give no triumph to the infidel.’
‘Peace, fool!’ said Richard, standing firm on his ground, and casting a fierce glance around; ‘thinkest thou that I can fail in his presence?’
The glittering broadsword, wielded by both his hands, rose aloft to the King’s left shoulder, circled round his head, descended with the sway of some terrific engine, and the bar of iron rolled on the ground in two pieces, as a woodsman would sever a sapling with a hedging-bill.
‘By the head of the Prophet, a most wonderful blow!’ said the Soldan, critically and accurately examining the iron bar which had been cut asunder; and the blade of the sword was so well tempered as to exhibit not the least token of having suffered by the feat it had performed. He then took the King’s hand, and looking on the size and muscular strength which it exhibited, laughed as he placed it beside his own, so lank and thin, so inferior in brawn and sinew.
‘Ay, look well,’ said De Vaux in English, ‘it will be long ere your long jackanape’s fingers do such a feat with your fine gilded reaping-hook there.’
‘Silence, De Vaux,’ said Richard; ‘by Our Lady, he understands or guesses thy meaning, be not so broad, I pray thee.’
The Soldan, indeed, presently said, ‘Something I would fain attempt, though wherefore should the weak show their inferiority in presence of the strong? Yet each land hath its own exercises, and this may be new to the Melech Ric’. So saying, he took from the floor a cushion of silk and down, and placed it upright on one end. ‘Can thy weapon, my brother, sever that cushion?’ he said to King Richard.
‘No, surely,’ replied the King; ‘no sword on earth, were it the Excalibur of King Arthur, can cut that which opposes no steady resistance to the blow.’
‘Mark, then,’ said Saladin; and tucking up the sleeve of his gown, showed his arm, thin indeed and spare, but which constant exercise had hardened into a mass consisting of nought but bone, brawn, and sinew. He unsheathed his scimitar, a curved and narrow blade, which glittered not like the swords of the Franks, but was, on the contrary, of a dull blue colour, marked with ten millions of meandering lines, which showed how anxiously the metal had been welded by the armourer. Wielding this weapon, apparently so inefficient when compared to that of Richard, the Soldan stood resting his weight upon his left foot, which was slightly advanced; he balanced himself a little, as if to steady his aim; then stepping at once forward, drew the scimitar across the cushion, applying the edge so dexterously, and with so little apparent effort, that the cushion seemed rather to fall asunder than to be divided by violence.
‘It is a juggler’s trick,’ said De Vaux, darting forward and snatching up the portion of the cushion which had been cut off, as if to assure himself of the reality of the feat; ‘there is gramarye in this.’
The Soldan seemed to comprehend him, for he undid the sort of veil which he had hitherto worn, laid it double along the edge of his sabre, extended the weapon edgeways in the air, and drawing it suddenly through the veil, although it hung on the blade entirely loose, severed that also into two parts, which floated to different sides of the tent, equally displaying the extreme temper and sharpness of the weapon, and the exquisite dexterity of him who used it.


Rapier (or in this case scimitar) or broadsword. Both can be absolutely lethal and both equally can cause a very long afternoon.
Whether it’s a rapier, scimitar, or broadsword, all three can do things differently, but all three can end the fight or make for a very long afternoon. In the end, it’s the swordsman, not the sword much like the old saying: "it’s the Indian, not the arrow.”
 
Buffalo with a .338 WM, I’ve always wondered about this very scenario. I’ve dreamt of being the first to write on this project. I’m glad to say if I’m only the second, I still have a long way to go.

Thanks for your candid writing.
I'd like to see how a 270 grain Swift A-frame loaded in my 358 Norma mag would preform on a Cape Buffalo.
 
acknowledged they are different. But, adrenaline disappears with a properly placed bullet. I keep hearing of these buffalo "shot through the heart" that then get up and charge. Or the bull that was "double lunged" or "shot through the chest" that goes for a mile to set up a carefully planned ambush.
Heart, lung here. Did go about a hundred yards maybe before expiring. Bullet was just under the skin on the other side.

1791157981650.png
 
I totally agree. I've never seen a heart shot or double lunged buffalo survive to be able to charge. Perhaps if it were an immediate follow up after first shot, but if given a little time to expire it should be game over. Wounded buffalo however can be adrinalin machines.
 
It is often considered a perfect choice for eland, which though admittedly wired differently, still may weigh 500 lbs more than that dugga boy.

Yet again we meet. I took the same example :A Gathering:
 

Forum statistics

Threads
70,355
Messages
1,573,909
Members
169,872
Latest member
LanoraKidw
 

 

 

Latest profile posts

K_P wrote on Buckleyguy12's profile.
Good morning from Montana.

I'm looking at a post from 2018 where you were looking for a lefty Winchester in .375 H&H Magnum. I'm selling mine. My email is [redacted] in the event that you're still searching for a unicorn.

Best,

Kelly Palmer
Gents, if you book and pay your deposit before the end of this year , you can have the bigger cull package for the 2026 price! https://www.africahunting.com/threa...griffiths-safaris-starting-at-us-2-560.96285/
I am currently in Northern Cape scouting a hunting area, we will have lots of amazing hunting opportunities for 2027! I will post updated available dates soon!
Azklmsr wrote on MANKAZANA SAFARIS's profile.
Good Evening. I am very interested in you hunt for the spiral slam. March in 2028 would be fine for me

Couple of quick questions:

1) Can we add some additional species on
2) what do you want for a deposit?
3) how do you want me to sign up

I'm on whats app or email

Kurt [redacted]

have a great evening
MHYOUNG 375 wrote on Marley7x57's profile.
If you really are interested I 'll send some pix. I have quiet a few.
 
Top