7 rem mag. 150cx or 160 accubond?

johnnybow

AH member
Joined
Feb 12, 2026
Messages
35
Reaction score
18
Hunting reports
Africa
1
I got both bullets shooting good. I'll be hunting plains game this fall with the biggest being cape kudo. Which bullet are you choosing?
 
Accubond. I’d be confident in both but I think lead core bullets kill better and cause more damage.
 
Accubond 150gr in a 280 Remington has been pretty solid on a bear I shot and a couple of elk for my uncle, I would think a 7RM would do well on PG
 
I like fast 7’s and in general stay with lighter bullets at max velocity. I see the 7’s for long range shooting on light big game. In your case I doubt long range will come into play so I’d opt for the AccuBond because of my experience with them.
 
160gr Accubond for sure.
 
I’m taking the 160gr AccuBond. Kudu are tough, thick-skinned.
If you are worried about them being thick skinned then why would you not recommend the monolithic CX bullet? Definitely will out penetrates the Accubond everytime.

Either will work. I’d say shoot what is the most accurate in your rifle.
 
If you’re only shooting in the bushveld I would go with the CX. If you’re hunting areas where both close shots as well as longer shots are needed the Accubond is probably better.
Overall they are both great bullets!
 
i have used the CX quite a bit as well as Accubond. I prefer the CX. Have had Accubonds open to quick and also pencil thru. Not often but the CX is boringly the same result every time.
 
160 grain Accubond would be my choice. My children and I have shot a lot of game around the world and the Accubond has never failed to perform.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
69,044
Messages
1,538,434
Members
159,387
Latest member
TrinidadBo
 

 

 
 
Top