And in any case, it would not be the ramp (ahead of the magazine) but the rails (on each side of the top of the magazine)...
The underlining factor,
Sjakon is that in order to ensure that the rifle will still chamber in the field possibly dirty / dusty rounds in a possibly dirty chamber with powder burning residues, quite often hunting rifle makers cut the chamber (especially DG rifles chamber) just a bit wider and just a bit deeper than a "match" chamber would be cut to exacting SAAMI specifications. As a result, fired cases expand and can be significantly wider and longer than SAAMI specifications, and their shoulder may move significantly forward, all of which can change the feeding geometry, although the most common issue is the difficulty to fully chamber and close the bolt on a reloaded round that is not fully resized.
Does the bolt close as easily on your reloads as it closes on factory ammo? You can check this easily by manually helping a cartridge get under the claw extractor to carry it into the chamber.
I once had the opposite issue. The chamber on a custom Dumoulin .338 Win was so tight that the bolt would not close on Federal Premium factory cartridges, although it closed without effort on other factory ammo. It seems that just the nickel plating of the cases was enough to "oversize" the cartridges for that chamber. Running lightly a brand-new finishing reamer in the chamber solved the issue.
It does not take much to alter the feeding geometry of a double stack Mauser magazine, and if yours happens to be tuned up to very exacting tolerances, it does not leave much room for cartridge case tolerances...
This being said,
uplander01's input is also far from irrelevant. Even the nicest rifles from the most prestigious makers sometimes suffer a QC failure. It would be highly surprising from a modern M98, but it is a classic issue on CZ 550's were a simple small machining bur in the wrong place under a rail can wreak havoc on the feeding. Taking a look at the underside of the rails does not hurt, but the advice is worth repeating,
do not take a file to the rails if you do not know very exactly what you are doing: too much material removed cannot be put back... Have Mauser fix it if you find or suspect anything: a tiny Poisson bur (material displaced rather than cut, and therefore bulging) may have been undetected in function testing with factory brass but may reveal itself with reloads.