375Fox
AH ambassador
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2020
- Messages
- 6,368
- Reaction score
- 22,064
- Location
- Pennsylvania
- Media
- 173
- Hunted
- Zambia, Namibia, South Africa, Zimbabwe, Cameroon, Tanzania
Willing to accept is a better phrase. If a practice doesn’t cast hunters in a bad light with non-hunters I really don’t have an issue. If CBL shooting would stop being called hunting I really wouldn’t care either. Call it farmed lion harvesting to distance it from hunting. When a non-hunter looks at what the practice is, I see no faster way to create an anti-hunter. I find it very objectionable. The farmed lion industry brought this on themselves telling marketing lies from the start. PHASA removing the word ethical to replace with legal is a dangerous slope. Professional organizations are there to hold an ethical standard apparently except in this case.So you support put and take hunting as long as the price is right on a non emotional animal?
The biggest issue is how we are defining put and take. Every animal released on a game farm is to be hunted, what we are discussing is everyone's ethical line on the size of the area and how long it has been released. That is going to vary from person to person, just like baiting, just like bow hunting, just like long range hunting, just like hound hunting.
Every animal is not released into a game farm just to be hunted. Plains game and buffalo are released to build mostly self sustaining herds. The old and excess are hunted, but they primarily live on fenced properties the same as they would outside the fence. CBL lions are released to be shot a very short time after. They will never breed or contribute to a lion population on that property. It was put there just to be taken during that hunting season. The fences were used do to hold it in until the hunter arrived.