Aaron N
AH legend
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2014
- Messages
- 2,789
- Reaction score
- 4,602
- Location
- Alberta, Canada
- Media
- 7
- Articles
- 2
- Hunted
- Canada, South Africa
Should it matter?Are any of the other First Ladies active politicians in their own right?
Should it matter?Are any of the other First Ladies active politicians in their own right?
Should it matter?
I say bring in every person named and let the world burn around themdepends on the context.. and depends on the line of questioning..
Epstien was indited for soliciting a minor for Prostitution in 2009 and then indited for federal sex crimes in 2019..
Trump ended his relationship with Epstien in 2004 and banned him from Mar-a-largo in 2007.. He married Melania in 2005.. so she wasnt a celebrity wife (thats all Trump was at the time) until after Epstien was already PNG in Trumps world..
Hillary on the other hand became Secretary of State in January 2009 and continued to have a relationship with Epstien (as did her husband) well after he was indited for soliciting a minor for Prostitution later that same year.. there are also photos of her and Epstien dating as far back as 1993 while her husband was the serving President of the United States.. confirming a relationship with Epstien while her husband was in power..
I'd say there is a stark difference between Melanias situation, and Hillarys..
None of the other first ladies went on to be a corrupt Secretary of State, presidential candidate, or one of the architects of the Steele Dossier.Nooooooo of course not. I just feel if one has to, they all should. You know, being fair and all.
Is your life insurance paid up?None of the other first ladies went on to be a corrupt Secretary of State, presidential candidate, or one of the architects of the Steele Dossier.
When it comes to first ladies, there has never been a more vile sack of shit then Hillary.
depends on the context.. and depends on the line of questioning..
Epstien was indited for soliciting a minor for Prostitution in 2009 and then indited for federal sex crimes in 2019..
Trump ended his relationship with Epstien in 2004 and banned him from Mar-a-largo in 2007.. He married Melania in 2005.. so she wasnt a celebrity wife (thats all Trump was at the time) until after Epstien was already PNG in Trumps world..
Hillary on the other hand became Secretary of State in January 2009 and continued to have a relationship with Epstien (as did her husband) well after he was indited for soliciting a minor for Prostitution later that same year.. there are also photos of her and Epstien dating as far back as 1993 while her husband was the serving President of the United States.. confirming a relationship with Epstien while her husband was in power..
I'd say there is a stark difference between Melanias situation, and Hillarys..
I would say anyone who spent time with the man would be a witness as to things that may have gone on.how are you going to bring in Elvis?
There are literally thousands of people named in the files.. most are mentioned casually and have exactly zero to do with any relationship or interaction with Maxwell or Epstien.. many were literally dead for years before they were mentioned.. many are mentioned completely out of context of any other conversation..
The files are available online now.. word search Melania.. see the context in which she is mentioned. see the context in which Trump is mentioned.. and then determine if shes actually a person of any interest for any reason whatsoever... (the answer is a clear "no" if you read the files)..
how are you going to bring in Elvis?
There are literally thousands of people named in the files.. most are mentioned casually and have exactly zero to do with any relationship or interaction with Maxwell or Epstien.. many were literally dead for years before they were mentioned.. many are mentioned completely out of context of any other conversation..
The files are available online now.. word search Melania.. see the context in which she is mentioned. see the context in which Trump is mentioned.. and then determine if shes actually a person of any interest for any reason whatsoever... (the answer is a clear "no" if you read the files)..
Sure does, when its obvious Hillary ran a pay to play scam when she was Secretary of State.Should it matter?
That’s fine, crucify her too, I’m not picking and choosing who I want investigated, I want everyone investigated. Even if it’s the god damn Pope himself. We know the tendency the clergy has for the youngn’sSure does, when its obvious Hillary ran a pay to play scam when she was Secretary of State.
Many major heads of state made personal donations to the Clinton foundation prior to meetings with her.
Scouting should be 100% non-political. Tie your knots, make a fire, enjoy eachothers company, treat everyone with respect, be a good citizen, and most importantly, have fun!For my fellow Scouters who have had concerns about the direction Scouting in the US has been going as well as the executive order effecting the department of war’s relationship with scouting, I just received an email from BSA detailing their new agreement with the DoW.
A key point for me is that they are doing away with the woke/dei citizenship in society merit badge that was adopted after the death of George Floyd.
Here is a cbs article discussing some of the changes.
![]()
Scouting America to alter policies including biological sex requirement to maintain military support, Hegseth says
Some of the changes mirror Scoutig America's suggestions to the Department of Justice, including discontinuing its Citizenship in Society merit badge and introducing a Military Service merit badge.www.cbsnews.com
I’m excited to see BSA going back towards a more moderate position. Money talks and I’m guessing that beyond the administration’s pressure, the membership numbers haven’t supported chasing short term political fads.
again.. depends on the context and the line of questioning..
I’d agree but I also wasn’t the one that decided we needed a merit badge about dei in response to blm and that it should also be required to earn Eagle Scout. Liberals have been aggressively working politics into BSA for the last 30 years.Scouting should be 100% non-political. Tie your knots, make a fire, enjoy eachothers company, treat everyone with respect, be a good citizen, and most importantly, have fun!
I would say anyone who spent time with the man would be a witness as to things that may have gone on.
No, I’m agreeing with you that it wasn’t needed.I’d agree but I also wasn’t the one that decided we needed a merit badge about dei in response to blm and that it should also be required to earn Eagle Scout. Liberals have been aggressively working politics into BSA for the last 30 years.
You should see the histrionics on Facebook scout groups from leftists over this. “Fascist this and fascist that.” It’s exhausting.
I think it could have been an elective and then it would have been fine. Making it required was virtue signaling and turned it into a partisan issue.No, I’m agreeing with you that it wasn’t needed.