European Parliament Takes a Science-Based Approach to Hunting

mark-hunter

AH ambassador
Joined
Aug 14, 2016
Messages
5,866
Reaction score
11,628
Media
53
Articles
2
Hunting reports
Africa
3
Member of
Hunting club, target shooting club, national hunting and shooting organisations
Hunted
Namibia: Kalahari, Khomas Highland, Caprivi, Zimbabwe: Doma area
Link:

qoute/unqoute

Strasbourg, 23 October 2025 – The European Parliament has adopted a resolution on the EU’s objectives for an upcoming global wildlife conference (CITES CoP20), aiming to strengthen the EU’s commitment to ensuring that trade in wild fauna and flora is legal and sustainable.

This year, CITES celebrates 50 years of regulating the global wildlife trade. The 20th meeting of the Conference of the Parties to CITES (CITES CoP20) will take place in Samarkand, Uzbekistan (24 November – 5 December 2025), defining the agenda for future international commitments on wildlife trade.

For the first time in a decade, the European Parliament has adopted a science-based approach to the movement of hunting trophies, avoiding calls for restrictions and instead acknowledging the benefits that well-managed hunting programmes can offer for wildlife conservation and local communities.

Alongside FACE, several organisations welcome the outcome of the European Parliament vote. Laurens Hoedemaker, FACE President, said, “The European Parliament must be commended for taking a science-based approach to hunting, and in particular, towards the movement of hunting trophies. This marks an important step in recognising the positive role that hunting can play.”

Title-1-1.jpg


Regarding the movement of hunting trophies within Europe, strict laws are in place to ensure sustainability. Additionally, the European Commission and experts from Member States are applying increased scrutiny on specific species under the EU Action Plan Against Wildlife Trafficking.

Importantly, the European Commission and other international organisations, such as IUCN, have acknowledged that legal and sustainable wildlife trade can offer multiple benefits to conservation, livelihoods, local economies, and support enforcement efforts to combat illegal activities.

In a Briefing Paper by the IUCN Sustainable Use and Livelihoods Specialist Group (IUCN SULi), experts argue that “poorly targeted or blanket bans or restrictions affect both good and bad hunting practices. They are blunt instruments that risk undermining important benefits for both conservation and local livelihoods, thus exacerbating rather than addressing the prevailing major threats of habitat loss and poaching”.
 
Question is whose advice they will be taking
There is no such thing as "scientific antihunting agenda", it is the same misconception as saying "wooden steel".
So, I would say it is very much straightforward, for whatever they take as advice.

Me as a hunter, from a small European country, even now I cannot complain. I can hunt something all year round. And hunting seasons for many species are few months long, and overlapping.
Gun laws are reasonably acceptable for average hunter. Several game reintroduction programs are in place, etc...

What is not good, is that some EU member countries make more strict laws, such as gun laws, hunting laws, or trophy import regulations, more strict then EU directives. So, getting more slack EU directives, can only help, but there is still problem with member countries if they want to make it more strict.
 
We know all what happened during COVID-19, just follow the science. We'll see what happens.
My country is also following the "science" and screwed us by selecting crazy outlier years and then saying see, populations are declining. Never trust any commie who does science.
 
Last edited:
We know all what happened during COVID-19, just follow the science. We'll see what happens.
My country is also following the "science" and screwed us by selecting crazy outlier years and then saying see, populations are declining. Never trust any commie who does science.

In commie science, first you write your conclusions (ideologically driven, of course), and then you look for "facts" which will support them.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
63,952
Messages
1,407,773
Members
127,741
Latest member
SammieShan
 

 

 

Latest posts

Latest profile posts

USMA84DAB wrote on JBryant's profile.
Second message to insure you are notified that someone is using my ID on this board to scam you.
ChooChoo404 wrote on MontanaGrant's profile.
Hi. Giving it serious consideration . Ive bought from azdave gonna ask him bout you

Any wisdom or opinions on that reticle? There a manual?
Hedge774 wrote on Odinsraven's profile.
Hey Odinsraven. Is that post from Jefferry 404 legitimate? I don't know him. Thanks!
Hedge
Manny R wrote on SETH RINGER's profile.
I have no idea the shipping cost from here to Costa Rica. I can do my research on shipping and get back with you later today.
 
Top