BoarHog375
AH senior member
Looking buying one of these in the near future. What's your honest opinions? Also if theres something that would be better than these two im open to suggestions. TIA
I have owned all three but stuck with the original .270Win for the same reasons listed above.I have both, and a regular .270 Winchester. .270 WSM Brass and factory ammo is very hit and miss for availability. Forget about finding it in South Africa. .270 WBY is sometimes found there.
Now the reality, I load for all 3. You burn more powder, get more recoil, shorter barrel life (if you shoot a lot), for a whopping 100 to 150 fps over the .270 Winchester. In the grand scheme of things it means very little. You also gain an extra round or two in the magazine with the original .270.
Most folks have read the advertising of 200+ fps over the .270 Win. Those numbers are in a test lab, test barrel, controlled conditions. In the real world you can expect maybe 100 fps. gain which does not mean much at hunting distances.
One benefit I have gained with the .270 WBY over the .270 WIN is the ability to move the 160 grain Nosler Partition at 2900 fps. That puts it right there with a 7mm rem mag. I do like the WBY over the WSM.
Finprof's advice on the 6.8 Western is sound. You can shoot heavy long bullets with the 1:8" twist.
Maybe you should just get one of each!
Certainly a capable round but if your going to deal with the recoil, why not just go with a .300win and have infinitely more bullet options?What about the 7mag as an option?
What about the 7mag as an option?