In my view, again based on limited usage, the Accubond is the better of the two, at least it retains more weight. As to whether one is a better killer than the other, who knows? I have taken one kudu each with the two bullets. One .338 Interbond 225 gr at 2625 fps, and the other was a 250gr Accubond in the 9.3x62 at 2500 fps. Both kudu were lung shot at about the same range of about 100 yards, and both ran a short distance and died. The one shot by the .338 ran a bit farther. Its interesting to me that on these two separate hunts only two bullets were recovered from each, and the kudu bulls were one of the animals wherein the bullets were found. If nothing else it proves to me at least, that kudu are big and probably tougher than usually given credit for. Given a choice of the two I would opt for the Nosler over the Hornady.