Thank you for these examples - you’re right about “all over the place”. I had a 375 once where there was a space about 3/4” between the receiver ring and the start of the qrib. I can’t say I liked the looks of but it was great for carrying in hand - my thumb fit right in there for a nonslip grip.
Thinking (critically) about your reply I would imagine the original quarter rib was probably a flat plane that extended from the front of the receiver ring to the rear sight giving the shooter an idea of rifle angle (positive or negative) in perspective to the front sight- just a guess though...
I’m of no help on the A Frames, I have seen North Forks available but only in cup point and flat point solids. Just in case I run across something, just to clarify, are you are looking for the .500 or .510 caliber bullets?
Thank you for coming up to the front on this. This thread is total honor system and it’s a great thread to have. It puts a damper on things when an item is taken and not reciprocated. Back in Dec of ‘23 I put up a really nice brand new roller duffle and I even paid the $50 to ship it. I could be...
Absolutely no negative about them at all, only observation. I’ve recovered some bullets from African game that were atrocious to look at - but they were recovered meaning dead animal. All’s well that ends well!
There’s no doubt that the rear end of the bullet is pushing the front end forward as a single unit BUT upon impact with substance “X” there is a momentum change between the now two distinct parts due to its lack of complete structural rigidity and the rear half now travels faster than the front...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.